Am 19.09.2011 12:10, schrieb Jesús Corrius:
>>> agree that at least for the first part reimplementing would be a good
>>> idea, and in fact I once had planned to do that. Admittedly it was never
>>> important enough.
>>
>> Not like it is a top priority now, but if you have some spare time, a
>> pa
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 12:10 +0200, Jesús Corrius wrote:
> I am sure we want the OLE drag and drop support, but would it be
> *THAT* bad if we remove the ActiveX control, for example? ;)
You would be surprised, but I know people that use it. Unfortunately
their name is customers.
F.
>> agree that at least for the first part reimplementing would be a good
>> idea, and in fact I once had planned to do that. Admittedly it was never
>> important enough.
>
> Not like it is a top priority now, but if you have some spare time, a
> patch would not be refused :)
Another interesting qu
Mathias
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 17:20 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> AFAIR it was used in some of the OLE implementations (embeddedobj or
> embedserv) and for the ActiveX-Control (extensions/source/soactivex).
Thanks for the explanation.
> I
> agree that at least for the first part reimplementing
Am 17.09.2011 15:01, schrieb Fridrich Strba:
> Hello, Mathias,
>
> On 17/09/11 00:01, Mathias Bauer wrote:
>> As you might know, building with VS Express requires disabling usage of
>> ATL headers as they are missing in the Express version.
>> When I was working on another project that forced me
Hello, Mathias,
On 17/09/11 00:01, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> As you might know, building with VS Express requires disabling usage of
> ATL headers as they are missing in the Express version.
> When I was working on another project that forced me to build Chromium,
> I found in their build instruction
Moin,
in case somebody wants to try it out:
As you might know, building with VS Express requires disabling usage of
ATL headers as they are missing in the Express version.
When I was working on another project that forced me to build Chromium,
I found in their build instructions that the MS Wind
