Hi Pedro, Probably better to bring this to the development mailing list...
On 2011-11-16 at 06:21 -0800, pedl...@gmail.com wrote: > The naming scheme you are using (naming the folder with the machine OS) seems > to imply that those builds are for that OS. There is only one MSVC build for > Windows and one MinGW. Why so many Tinderboxes? > > That is confusing for users... If it helps our QA guys, indeed, let's agree on a consistent naming; we'll bring it as a topic at the tomorrow's TSC meeting. But we definitely do not want to limit the amount of the tinderboxes. The tinderboxes are operated by volunteers; it happens from time to time that the some of the people do not have time to update a box when it gets stuck or something, so it is always better to have more of them as backup. > Can you please take a look at this topic > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Windows-tinderboxes-tp3509359p3509359.html The situation when we did not have Windows builds for quite long was extremely unfortunate, and I hope we'll be able to prevent that now with the reasonably fast Windows tinderbox. Hope that helps, Kendy _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
