Hi Cesare,
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 15:16 +0200, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
> In my opinion:
>
> * 320 MB for an installer is too much. If you don't have a fast internet
> access or if you have a mobile provider that gives you time/data limit,
> probably you'd have to find another way to get LibreOffi
> * 320 MB for an installer is too much. If you don't have a fast internet
> access or if you have a mobile provider that gives you time/data limit,
> probably you'd have to find another way to get LibreOffice.
I can see that the size is an issue, but not because of download time.
320 MB is app
On 10/14/2010 12:00 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I see that it's an installer that includes all the languages but i
wonder if it is really necessary and if the languages are the only
cause.
Well, there certainly isn't hundreds (or even tens) of megabytes of
new code, as far as I know, so yes, it mu
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > To me were more smart the go-oo approach: an english installer + the
> > interested language pack.
>
> Sorry, but I think that is against the Document Foundation's "Next Decade
> Manifesto", which says: "WE REJECT: [...] the creeping domination of co
> I see that it's an installer that includes all the languages but i
> wonder if it is really necessary and if the languages are the only cause.
Well, there certainly isn't hundreds (or even tens) of megabytes of new code,
as far as I know, so yes, it must be the languages.
> Even if the instal
Hello guys, just some comments and question about the Windows installer
from a user and a Win2000 tester.
Today i wanted to download LO-3.3.0-beta2 for Windows and i left
speechless in front of the download size: 318 MB! More than 2 times than
beta1.
I see that it's an installer that includes
