2011/12/15 Bjoern Michaelsen :
>
> It is (unless I broke it with the last major gbuild -- it should be easy to
> fix
> then). That said, I really have a bad feeling about letting end users compile
> distro builds without running these tests -- the last thing we need is
> additional bugzilla worklo
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:49:41PM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> > IIUC, "make build" will omit the checks (and "make unitcheck" will execute
> > them).
(for gbuildified modules, build.pl modules will still run tests)
> >
> > Stephan
>
> That would be awesome to see implemented.
It is (unless I
2011/12/15 Stephan Bergmann :
> On 12/15/2011 10:58 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>>
>> So unless you can look at one of those traces and tell me that the
>> build should be stopped because "it is obvious error in the code (not
>> in the test, the app code) that needs to be fixed" I would want you
>
>
>
On 12/15/2011 10:58 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
So unless you can look at one of those traces and tell me that the
build should be stopped because "it is obvious error in the code (not
in the test, the app code) that needs to be fixed" I would want you
Hard to tell without a backtrace.
guys to r
Hello guys,
as again there is new series of lo it means more tests were added to
the list of those that are run during the make phase (where normal
software do only build).
For developers it helps to identify issues quickly because your build
crashes if you try to compile your changes but for user
