Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 13:03 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:55:12AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > On the low-power topic there's some medium-level hacks to try and remove > > the "unending timers" that LibreOffice still has that keep waking up the > > CPU and eating b

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:55:12AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On the low-power topic there's some medium-level hacks to try and remove > the "unending timers" that LibreOffice still has that keep waking up the > CPU and eating battery life if that's an interest for you. Are the UUID_SYSTEM_TI

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 11:34 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > Removed SINIX and HP9000 (except for bootstrap). So HP-UX could be > removed as well? Yeah, like I mentioned in some other mail, the only platforms that can possibly function are the ones that have a bridge in bridges/source/cpp_uno. SCO c

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:34:28AM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > > > > I suppose we'll have to make such a list. All the Linux ports should > > remain, as should the BSDbased ones, MacOSX, Windows, Solaris and AIX as > > they work and are complete. The reality of what has a chance of working > >

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/15/2011 10:28 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 22:22 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: >> Of the ports listed on http://porting.openoffice.org/ , Tru64 is dead and >> I would be surprised if VMS and Linux/m68k were much alive. > > Yeah, only take the "completed" one, VMS and Tr

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, >> And another thing, in combination with GCC: "C272" (occurs with GCC) >> i.e. at impress/sd/source/ui/view/zoomlist.cxx:#if ( defined GCC && >> defined C272 ) . Doesn't look that this is set anymore. > > Yeah, you got me there. No idea where C272 came from. I strongly suspect > it was set t

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 22:22 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > Of the ports listed on http://porting.openoffice.org/ , Tru64 is dead and > I would be surprised if VMS and Linux/m68k were much alive. Yeah, only take the "completed" one, VMS and Tru64 never actually happened. m68k only exists emulated

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:05:15PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 18:34 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > - i386 / amd64 > > - power / powerppc > > - sparc / sparc64 > > - arm > > - mips > > - alpha > > http://porting.openoffice.org/ might help btw. FWIW We (Red Hat, Inc.

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 18:34 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > We also have at least msdos and Atari ST in dmake/ That's just the imported and hacked up third party dmake tool, so can be ignored. > - i386 / amd64 > - power / powerppc > - sparc / sparc64 > - arm > - mips > - alpha > > Everything els

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 18:14 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > Hi, > > i stumbled across some precompiler checks for several (deprecated?) arches: > HP9000 (already removed some parts of this) > SINIX > RM400 Yeah, those can all go. > And another thing, in combination with GCC: "C272" (occurs with

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi, On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 06:14:36PM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > > i stumbled across some precompiler checks for several (deprecated?) arches: > > HP9000 (already removed some parts of this) > SINIX > RM400 > ... > > There is a full list of this stuff at bootstrap/solenv/bin/modules/osarch

[Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, i stumbled across some precompiler checks for several (deprecated?) arches: HP9000 (already removed some parts of this) SINIX RM400 ... And another thing, in combination with GCC: "C272" (occurs with GCC) i.e. at impress/sd/source/ui/view/zoomlist.cxx:#if ( defined GCC && defined C272 ) . Do