Re: [Libreoffice] Review fix for fdo#32039 for inclusion in 3.3

2010-12-03 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 21:54 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > Caolan, Michael, Miklos, > > Could you please have a look at the patch attached to > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32039 ? Looks sane to me. But you guys know this code better than me. C. ___

Re: [Libreoffice] Review fix for fdo#32039 for inclusion in 3.3

2010-12-02 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:54:50PM +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > Caolan, Michael, Miklos, > > Could you please have a look at the patch attached to > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32039 ? > > I'ld like to push that fix for 3.3 as the bug is a regression introduced > by our rew

[Libreoffice] Review fix for fdo#32039 for inclusion in 3.3

2010-12-02 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Caolan, Michael, Miklos, Could you please have a look at the patch attached to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32039 ? I'ld like to push that fix for 3.3 as the bug is a regression introduced by our rework of the RTF export filter. Regards, -- Cédric Bosdonnat LibreOffice hacker ht