Andrea Pescetti píše v So 11. 12. 2010 v 11:45 +0100:
> On 06/12/2010 Petr Mladek wrote:
> > Andrea Pescetti píše v Ne 05. 12. 2010 v 18:39 +0100:
> > > So a major change with respect to the OpenOffice.org release process
> > > would be that no explicit approval is needed for localized versions.
>
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 11:45 +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> These are all valid solutions, but they will not help for the quality of
> the first (3.3) release, which will be rather important. Maybe a
> solution for the Microsoft Windows package could be to put in the
> "smaller" multi-language ins
On 13/12/2010 13:57, Petr Mladek wrote:
Hi,
ah, I have somehow missed this mail.
Sophie Gautier píše v Ne 05. 12. 2010 v 20:49 +0300:
Hi Andrea, all,
On 05/12/2010 20:39, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 26/11/2010 Petr Mladek wrote:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
Feel free to
Hi,
ah, I have somehow missed this mail.
Sophie Gautier píše v Ne 05. 12. 2010 v 20:49 +0300:
> Hi Andrea, all,
> On 05/12/2010 20:39, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > On 26/11/2010 Petr Mladek wrote:
> >> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
> >> Feel free to update it or propose improv
On 06/12/2010 Petr Mladek wrote:
> Andrea Pescetti píše v Ne 05. 12. 2010 v 18:39 +0100:
> > So a major change with respect to the OpenOffice.org release process
> > would be that no explicit approval is needed for localized versions.
> ... I understand your concerns. We came with the central build
Andrea Pescetti píše v Ne 05. 12. 2010 v 18:39 +0100:
> On 26/11/2010 Petr Mladek wrote:
> > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
> > Feel free to update it or propose improvements. Especially, I am not
> > sure about bugs in localizations.
>
> So a major change with respect to the
Hi Andrea, all,
On 05/12/2010 20:39, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 26/11/2010 Petr Mladek wrote:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
Feel free to update it or propose improvements. Especially, I am not
sure about bugs in localizations.
So a major change with respect to the OpenOffi
On 26/11/2010 Petr Mladek wrote:
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
> Feel free to update it or propose improvements. Especially, I am not
> sure about bugs in localizations.
So a major change with respect to the OpenOffice.org release process
would be that no explicit approval
Petr Mladek wrote:
> I like the idea about adding libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org into CC
> of the meta bug. IMHO, it is worth to have the discussion about blocker
> bugs on the dev mailing list. Others might help to provide more details
> if we are in doubts...
>
> Thorsten, Kendy, others, wha
Yi Fan Jiang píše v So 27. 11. 2010 v 19:07 -0700:
> Hi Petr,
>
> The blocker criteria would be quite useful ;-) Thank you!
>
> For the process to nominate a blocker, is there a specific reason to
> report a nomination
> twice (1 in mailing list, 2 in bugzilla)?
>
>
Hi there,
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 06:57 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> > So - I tend to think that time will tell if we need to change this. The
> > seven day period seems long to me.
>
> Seven days is a not so long period when you have to organize manual testing.
> As you can see with OOo
Hi Petr,
The blocker criteria would be quite useful ;-) Thank you!
For the process to nominate a blocker, is there a specific reason to report a
nomination
twice (1 in mailing list, 2 in bugzilla)?
Le 26/11/2010 20:50, Michael Meeks a écrit :
> On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 15:52 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
>> we are getting close to the first release candidate and final release.
> :-)
>
>> Feel free to update it or propose improvements. Especially, I am not
>> sure about bugs in localizations.
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 15:52 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> we are getting close to the first release candidate and final release.
:-)
> Feel free to update it or propose improvements. Especially, I am not
> sure about bugs in localizations.
So - I tend to think that time will tell
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Arthur Machlas píše v Pá 26. 11. 2010 v 10:36 -0600:
>> [N] "LibreOffice is used by many users every day. Any new release must
>> not break their day job. Though, every software has bugs."
>> [S] Remove "Though, every software has bugs." Partl
Arthur Machlas píše v Pá 26. 11. 2010 v 10:36 -0600:
> Not a member of this list, just passing through, but I thought I'd
> throw some corrections / suggestions re: criteria
>
> > Now [N], Suggestion [S], Correction [C]
>
> [N] "LibreOffice is used by many users every day. Any new release must
>
Not a member of this list, just passing through, but I thought I'd
throw some corrections / suggestions re: criteria
> Now [N], Suggestion [S], Correction [C]
[N] "LibreOffice is used by many users every day. Any new release must
not break their day job. Though, every software has bugs."
[S] Remo
Hi,
we are getting close to the first release candidate and final release.
I have created proposal of the release criteria and definition of the
blocker bugs at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
Feel free to update it or propose improvements. Especially, I am not
sure about bu
18 matches
Mail list logo
