On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 05:57:39PM +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote:
>> --->8-
>> Hi Sophie / Petr and all,
>>
>> Thanks for the comments and ideas! I updated several wiki pages today to
>> outline what we got through the discussion. Please would
Hi Yifan,
On 27/04/2011 13:42, Yifan Jiang wrote:
Hey Sophie,
Thanks for mentioning it :)
You're welcome, my fault to be so late.
I have ever sent a process document to wiki in the
mid of the month (13/Apr or so). The content attached as follows as well. It
would be great if you have a revi
Hey Sophie,
Thanks for mentioning it :) I have ever sent a process document to wiki in the
mid of the month (13/Apr or so). The content attached as follows as well. It
would be great if you have a review if time.
Best wishes,
Yifan
--->8-
H
Hi Yifan, all,
I'm sorry, I've lost the track on the QA work you've done. I've been a
bit overwhelmed by the l10n and MC process.
Were you waiting a feedback from my side, and if yes could you point me
to the links to the page I should read.
Do you still have questions and do you want we plan a
Yifan Jiang píše v St 13. 04. 2011 v 17:29 +0800:
> > > Collect the results on the wiki may be more easier for every body to
> > > participate.
> >
> > It might be enough to show them in Litmus if they are well visible
> > there.
>
> It looks a report page for a specific run can be generated as:
2011/4/12 Petr Mladek :
> Sophie Gautier píše v Po 11. 04. 2011 v 14:59 +0300:
>> We need a special build called KeyID build for l10n QA. This build
>> contains a unique ref for each string in the UI, see
>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/KeyID_Build
>
> Do you need the KeeID build for ev
Yifan Jiang píše v St 13. 04. 2011 v 16:43 +0800:
> Hi Sophie / Petr and all,
>
> Thanks for the comments and ideas! I updated several wiki pages today to
> outline what we got through the discussion. Please would you have a review and
> feedback is appreicated :)
I like all the changes. The main
> > Collect the results on the wiki may be more easier for every body to
> > participate.
>
> It might be enough to show them in Litmus if they are well visible
> there.
It looks a report page for a specific run can be generated as:
https://tcm.documentfoundation.org/test_run_report.cgi?test_ru
Hi Sophie / Petr and all,
Thanks for the comments and ideas! I updated several wiki pages today to
outline what we got through the discussion. Please would you have a review and
feedback is appreicated :)
Details comes with:
1. Re-structure of QA page to put stuff into proper process.
http:
ing the localization.
+1
> > - QA announces RC build pass/fail based on Release Criteria
> >
> > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
> >
> > + Where do we announce the results (mailing list, wiki)?
> Collect the results on the
of Litmus today I thin, on
the project list.
And would you help to outline the localization part below if the structure
is divided properly :) Thank you!
-------------
Libreoffice QA process - draft and propose to apply from
e the localization part below if the structure
is divided properly :) Thank you!
-------------
Libreoffice QA process - draft and propose to apply from Libreoffice 3.4
The process document aims to be a practical guildline for Libreoffi
12 matches
Mail list logo
