On Saturday 04 of June 2011, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 22:06 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
> > So here is my suggestion: I propose the everyone here head over to the
> > Apache Incubator and join the proposal as an initial member.
>
> Just so you know, I've been following that thr
Hi Allen, *,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
> [...]
> I don't know what vision IBM has for the project. I don't know what code
> contribution they are going to make--I'm certain they will make some, but I
> don't know what they will be. I don't know what contributions mem
Hi Allen,
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 09:08 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
> If we wait however, we risk being locked out.
That is what Rob's blog tries to imply. My conversations with various
key Apache leaders suggest that, on the contrary, their governance will
-never- lock people out; it is g
Hello Kohei,
Thank you for your reply. I can certainly understand your sentiment, and I
completely respect it.
Just to clarify one thing:
> Suggesting that we somehow owe anything to them just because of the past
is,
> to put it mildly insane, and in some way insulting.
I certainly never made
Allen,
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 22:06 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
>
> So here is my suggestion: I propose the everyone here head over to the
> Apache Incubator and join the proposal as an initial member.
Just so you know, I've been following that thread on the Apache list by
reading the archives,
Allen Pulsifer wrote:
> But the time to jump in is now. We can't wait.
>
What is that nonsense?! I can start contributing to Apache anytime I
want - and it's not that the initial committers have *any* exclusive
right on anything.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpY7ICP7LI9V.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
Hello All,
I'm going to try to address as many of the concerns raised as I can in one
email.
I'm not suggesting that anyone go work for IBM. In fact, I'm suggesting
just the opposite; I'm suggesting that we all work together to get IBM
working for us.
Here's the deal. IBM is the main proponent
On 04.06.2011 6:06, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
Among
other requirements, the podling project has to review the copyright history
of all code to ensure it has a clean "title" and is or can be licensed under
the Apache License.
A lurker is speaking here.
AFAIU, one of the reasons why Go-Openoffice spl
2011/6/4 Jesús Corrius :
> As if understanding and using the "old" OOo build mechanisms which have been
> somewhat adapted at LO wasn't hard enough.
As a user (with just a tiny contribution) I really wish that OO.o
would just die already.
It is not "just" that the current community are much more
> And finally, whether it would make any sense from the technical point of view
> for LibreOffice contributors to even try to participate in OOo at ASF depends
> very much on what actually ends up there, and in what direction it is taken
> by the presumed main driving force, IBM. For all we know
> So here is my suggestion: I propose the everyone here head over to the
> Apache Incubator and join the proposal as an initial member.
Well, at least for me the problem is:
I *work* on LibreOffice. I f I wasn't paid to do it, I doubt I would touch it.
Or maybe I would, hard to know. As far as
Greetings All,
Some of you will remember me as a long time member of the OpenOffice.org
community. In fact, back in the day, it was sometimes just myself and
Michael Meeks who were openly complaining on the OOo mailing list about
Sun's handling of the "community" :-)
I'm writing today about what
12 matches
Mail list logo
