Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Aquilina píše v St 10. 08. 2011 v 11:39 +0200:
> Kendy shouldnt opengrok still be indexing the old build system for those
> building 3.4.x ?
[Stripped the unnecessary context that you've let in the mail...]
No need to, all the 3.4 fixes have to be backports from master no
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 11:35 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> On 2011-08-10 at 10:30 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
>
> > It was just me being too slow to migrate it just when coming back from
> > vacations. It's not indexing core, binfilter, help and translations
>
> s/not/now/ right? ;-)
Oops, in
Kendy shouldnt opengrok still be indexing the old build system for those
building 3.4.x ?
On 8/10/11 11:35 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
On 2011-08-10 at 10:30 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
It was just me being too slow to migrate it just when coming back from
vacations. It's not indexing core,
On 2011-08-10 at 10:30 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> It was just me being too slow to migrate it just when coming back from
> vacations. It's not indexing core, binfilter, help and translations
s/not/now/ right? ;-)
> repos since yesterday evening (Europe time).
K.
_
Hello Nigel,
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 09:25 +0100, Nigel Hawkins wrote:
> Am I right in thinking that the opengrok tool is still tracking the old
> repositories rather than the new "core" repository?
>
> Or is it just not updated very often?
It was just me being too slow to migrate it just when com
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 09:25 +0100, Nigel Hawkins wrote:
> Am I right in thinking that the opengrok tool is still tracking the old
> repositories rather than the new "core" repository?
>
> Or is it just not updated very often?
Please ignore that, it seems to have changed over-night.
_
Hi all,
Am I right in thinking that the opengrok tool is still tracking the old
repositories rather than the new "core" repository?
Or is it just not updated very often?
Nigel
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists
