HI all
Please note my email change from oooc...@free.fr to
lgodard.li...@laposte.net
the most important
I license all my contributions past+future under
MPL/LGPLv3+
Laurent
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.
I confirm that all my patches to LibreOffice are licensed under
LGPL3+/GPL3+/MPL.
Ivan Timofeev.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
hi all,
licensing statement, valid until further notice:
Any patches of which i'm the author that i send to the LibreOffice lists
or commit to the LibreOffice repos are available under LGPLv3+/MPLv1.1
license unless explicitly noted otherwise, or, in case of newly added
files, the license header
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Peter Foley wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Peter Foley wrote:
>
> All of my patches are contributed under
> MPL 1.1/GLPv3+/LGPLv3+
>
> Thanks,
Thanks you for that, and thank you for having updated
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers, much
apprec
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Peter Foley wrote:
All of my patches are contributed under
MPL 1.1/GLPv3+/LGPLv3+
Thanks,
Peter
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Norbert,
On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 15:01 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> I've added a 'License' column in the list of developers in the wiki
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers
Thanks for doing that :-) there is a 'le...@documentfoundation.org'
alias - to which I s
I've added a 'License' column in the list of developers in the wiki
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers
This column is meant to have links to post(s) in the mailing list that
indicate the concerned developers statement of license.
This is useful for patch reviewer/committer w
Hello there,
Yeah, I'd like add to what Thorsten said. My work(Including GSOC works
and apart from that) can be submitted to LGPLv3+/MPL dual license and
its future versions also.
Regards
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
> Anurag Jain wrote:
>> I'd like to say that all
Hello everyone,
I'd like to say that all my contribution towards Libre office suite
codebase can be licensed under LGPSv3/MPL dual license. My work will
includes all the patches which I've submitted under GSOC program and
apart from that , and LGPLv3/MPL can be applied to all of them.
Thanks and
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 12:32 -0700, BRM wrote:
> - Original Message
>
> > From: Kohei Yoshida
> > To: BRM
> > Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Sent: Mon, June 6, 2011 11:44:37 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice licensing
> &
- Original Message
> From: Kohei Yoshida
> To: BRM
> Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> Sent: Mon, June 6, 2011 11:44:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice licensing
>
> On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 07:39 -0700, BRM wrote:
>
> > Just remember
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 07:39 -0700, BRM wrote:
> Just remember, that even with LGPL/GPL the changes _do not have to be
> contributed back to the community_; only made available to the customers of
> that
> product upon request (per LGPL, GPL and MPL).
Not entirely correct. The source has to be
- Original Message
> From: Jesús Corrius
> To: michael.me...@novell.com
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Meeks
>wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
> >> 1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO
>
Le 2011-06-04 12:11, Michael Meeks a écrit :
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO
contributions under the LGPL/MPL and licenses the combined work
(LibreOffice) under both the LGPL and MPL?
So if we s
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
>> 1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO
>> contributions under the LGPL/MPL and licenses the combined work
>> (LibreOffice) under both the LGP
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
> 1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO
> contributions under the LGPL/MPL and licenses the combined work
> (LibreOffice) under both the LGPL and MPL?
So if we say MPLv2 and LGPLv3+ - that is fine; and th
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:59, Rafael Dominguez wrote:
>
> Well im no legal expert, but from what i understand of the LGPL/MPL
> licenses, they still are copyleft licenses, you can merge apache code and
> libreoffice code, make your own version if you want, sell it etc, but if you
> make any deriva
Well im no legal expert, but from what i understand of the LGPL/MPL
licenses, they still are copyleft licenses, you can merge apache code and
libreoffice code, make your own version if you want, sell it etc, but if you
make any derivative work, you need to make those changes available to the
rest,
> If I understand correctly:
> What is developed by the Apache license can be "used" at LibreOffice but
what is done by LibreOffice
> can not be used by OpenOffice as OpenOffice would move to offer the
principles of under the GPL.
I'm not sure this is entirely correct. TDF allowed itself some lic
20 matches
Mail list logo
