On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:21:10 +0100
Michael Meeks
wrote:
>
> Which reminds me; why are we not checking in configure for
> make 2.82 ? IIRC there was some to/fro on that - but I forget the
> result; not checking for a make with the fix we need is a tad odd
> right ?
Yes, there seems to be a
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 12:39 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > Sorry for bothering, but does anyone have the idea what went wrong
> > while making the build?
Which reminds me; why are we not checking in configure for make 2.82 ?
IIRC there was some to/fro on that - but I forget the resul
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:54:43 +0530
swagat sharma
wrote:
> Sorry for bothering, but does anyone have the idea what went wrong
> while making the build?
looks like:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/make-dfsg/+bug/759704
Best,
Bjoern
--
https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen
___
Hi all,
Sorry for bothering, but does anyone have the idea what went wrong while
making the build?
/bin/bash: line 1: 15233 Segmentation fault make -s -r -j2
dmake: Error code 139, while making 'all'
---
Oh dear
cd /mnt/my_book/lang/sources/git/libreoffice/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2
source ./LinuxX86Env.Set.sh
cd vcl
build
.
Entering
/mnt/my_book/lang/sources/git/libreoffice/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/vcl/unx/kde4
Compiling: vcl/unxlngi6.pro/misc/KDEXLib.moc.cxx
../../unxlngi6.pro/misc/KDEXLib.moc.cxx
