On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 12:32 -0700, BRM wrote:
> - Original Message
>
> > From: Kohei Yoshida
> > To: BRM
> > Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Sent: Mon, June 6, 2011 11:44:37 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice licensing
> &
- Original Message
> From: Kohei Yoshida
> To: BRM
> Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> Sent: Mon, June 6, 2011 11:44:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice licensing
>
> On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 07:39 -0700, BRM wrote:
>
> > Just remember
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 07:39 -0700, BRM wrote:
> Just remember, that even with LGPL/GPL the changes _do not have to be
> contributed back to the community_; only made available to the customers of
> that
> product upon request (per LGPL, GPL and MPL).
Not entirely correct. The source has to be
- Original Message
> From: Jesús Corrius
> To: michael.me...@novell.com
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Meeks
>wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
> >> 1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO
>
Le 2011-06-04 12:11, Michael Meeks a écrit :
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO
contributions under the LGPL/MPL and licenses the combined work
(LibreOffice) under both the LGPL and MPL?
So if we s
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
>> 1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO
>> contributions under the LGPL/MPL and licenses the combined work
>> (LibreOffice) under both the LGP
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
> 1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO
> contributions under the LGPL/MPL and licenses the combined work
> (LibreOffice) under both the LGPL and MPL?
So if we say MPLv2 and LGPLv3+ - that is fine; and th
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:59, Rafael Dominguez wrote:
>
> Well im no legal expert, but from what i understand of the LGPL/MPL
> licenses, they still are copyleft licenses, you can merge apache code and
> libreoffice code, make your own version if you want, sell it etc, but if you
> make any deriva
Well im no legal expert, but from what i understand of the LGPL/MPL
licenses, they still are copyleft licenses, you can merge apache code and
libreoffice code, make your own version if you want, sell it etc, but if you
make any derivative work, you need to make those changes available to the
rest,
> If I understand correctly:
> What is developed by the Apache license can be "used" at LibreOffice but
what is done by LibreOffice
> can not be used by OpenOffice as OpenOffice would move to offer the
principles of under the GPL.
I'm not sure this is entirely correct. TDF allowed itself some lic
10 matches
Mail list logo
