On Friday 27 of January 2012, Muthu Subramanian K wrote:
> Hello Alexander,
>
> Its nice to see those patches. But, it will be nice to see/use the
> tools/scripts directly? Especially if they can be hooked to git (like
> the current white space/tabs removal ones)?
Are you seriously suggesting tha
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 16:42 +0530, Muthu Subramanian K wrote:
> Yes, I very well agree with this - I have faced problems with the
> history before. But, I was actually referring to specifically the git
> hooks - which might be helpful in catching typos?
Mea culpa; I should have read your
> So - -really- I'm less convinced of that. As I said - this busts our
> history.
Yes, I very well agree with this - I have faced problems with the
history before. But, I was actually referring to specifically the git
hooks - which might be helpful in catching typos?
>
> So - as I sai
Hi Muthu,
Its nice to see those patches. But, it will be nice to see/use the
tools/scripts directly? Especially if they can be hooked to git (like
the current white space/tabs removal ones)?
First I noticed, that ( () ) did only appear in two cases: SAL_THROW( ()
) and THROWS( () )
As I wan
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 10:19 +0530, Muthu Subramanian K wrote:
> Its nice to see those patches. But, it will be nice to see/use the
> tools/scripts directly
So - -really- I'm less convinced of that. As I said - this busts our
history.
It is true that we did a big whitespace cleanu
On 01/27/2012 07:54 AM, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
... but we have no strong rule about this kind of formatting.
The "Code Conventions" page[1] we refer to in our Development wiki
page[2] contains nothing about foo( bar ); vs foo(bar); vs foo (bar);
Personally I prefer the second variant, but usually
On 01/27/2012 05:49 AM, Muthu Subramanian K wrote:
Its nice to see those patches. But, it will be nice to see/use the
tools/scripts directly? Especially if they can be hooked to git (like
the current white space/tabs removal ones)?
@lubos: Alexander is good with scripts, so as a starter he wante
27.01.2012 08:55, Muthu Subramanian K пишет:
@Alex: Forgot to mention one more thing: We follow (normally) space
after '(' and before ')' if there are parameters. Sometimes, we would be
tempted to remove the space in cases like foo( param1, param2 ); as well
;) ( I am always tempted in such cases
@Alex: Forgot to mention one more thing: We follow (normally) space
after '(' and before ')' if there are parameters. Sometimes, we would be
tempted to remove the space in cases like foo( param1, param2 ); as well
;) ( I am always tempted in such cases :P )
On 01/27/2012 10:19 AM, Muthu Subramania
Hello Alexander,
Its nice to see those patches. But, it will be nice to see/use the
tools/scripts directly? Especially if they can be hooked to git (like
the current white space/tabs removal ones)?
@lubos: Alexander is good with scripts, so as a starter he wanted to do
something like
"http://cgit
10 matches
Mail list logo
