Le 2011-05-30 06:04, Marc Paré a écrit :
What I want to stress, is that we need to explain, and show
- the release rationale:
point zero release is only for ..., and not for ...
- plus that IMO we must at least for point zero releases
the knows nasty bugs
On the current release notes page thos
Le 2011-05-29 17:28, Cor Nouws a écrit :
Hi Marc, all,
[ ooops what a terrible cross post, four lists ;-)
I skipp the project and website list for the moment
and IMO follow ups for my subject (see below)
should be at marketing preferably
devs with an relevant opinion can either join or
hire a go
Hi Marc, all,
[ ooops what a terrible cross post, four lists ;-)
I skipp the project and website list for the moment
and IMO follow ups for my subject (see below)
should be at marketing preferably
devs with an relevant opinion can either join or
hire a gohst writer ;-)
]
Marc Paré wrot
Le 2011-05-20 09:51, Michael Meeks a écrit :
Hah,
Ignore my previous slightly sharp mail wrt. testing - I had forgotten
you're doing all this great marketing research& work :-)
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 09:07 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
The object of this exercise is to see if we could have t
Hah,
Ignore my previous slightly sharp mail wrt. testing - I had forgotten
you're doing all this great marketing research & work :-)
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 09:07 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
> The object of this exercise is to see if we could have the release
> notes, on the website page, rele
Hi Michael et al
It was suggested during the confcall that we should perhaps concentrate
on this issue on the mailing list. I think that the idea is that members
on the projects list are prepared to expedite issues here a little more
quickly than on the other lists.
The object of this exerci
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 11:11 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Feature_Freeze_Testing_3.4
>
> Which we should no doubt mention (with suitable crediting) -
> though be
> careful of the calc feature overlap, where Kohei had to re-implement a
> number of pi
Hi Marc,
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 09:35 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
> Could we, all, please take a close look at the information on the
> Release Notes 3.4 wiki page[1] to make sure that the information is
> complete and correct ?
Completeness is hard :-) but I poked a number of people last w
At the last marketing team confcall I offered to help coordinate
completing the release notes of the upcoming 3.4 version and then
distilling the information into a version more suitable for our website
accompanied with photos of some or many of these changes.
Could we, all, please take a clos
