Hi Francois,
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 18:07 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> I'm not running MacOS X, but all my LibreOffice builds are done without
> Java and the only obvious broken feature is the Contributor Credits link
> accessible from the help/about menu.
Oh - that is curious indeed -
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 15:30 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Is this really so ? it'd be great to isolate and kill whatever Java is
> required to save anything on Mac ?
I'd have to be convinced that it is anything to do with Java,
correlation rather than causation IMO.
C.
__
Aren't in fact these people reporting bugs in 3rd-party software like LO when
using a pre-release version of Mac OS X (or just OS X, as it will be called
from 10.7) breaking the terms of using such a pre-release version? At least for
iOS and iOS SDK developer pre-releases, the NDA rules are quit
Hi Michael, *,
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/01/mac_os_x_10_point_7_preview/page2.html
1st of all: This is about a not-yet-released version of Max OS X.
> hypothetical scenario, if you had just installed LibreOffice and
>
If your gonna kill the java parts of LO for mac whats the advantage of
keeping it for other os's. Without the java bits is it possible we can
gain further performance improvements and over all size reduction?
On 01/07/2011 16:30, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi guys,
So:
http://www.theregist
Hi Michael,
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 03:30:37PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/01/mac_os_x_10_point_7_preview/page2.html
>
> hypothetical scenario, if you had just installed LibreOffice and
> written a few hundred words of copy, you wouldn't be ab
Hi guys,
So:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/01/mac_os_x_10_point_7_preview/page2.html
Java has been dropped, too, but there is slightly more hope for
Java users: the first time you try to run a Java app, the OS
will offer to download and install one for you.
