On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 09:39 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > You know, that I work on it in my spare time, so response time might
> be
> > long. You should tell me, whether the mathematics I used are clear
> from
> > the code or you want me to write a description.
>
> Understood. We certainly wa
Hi Regina,
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 10:35 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
> > Hi Regina,
> >
> > On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 18:13 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'm currently working on LINEST and have attached a draft to issue
> >> http://www.op
Hi Kohei,
Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
Hi Regina,
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 18:13 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently working on LINEST and have attached a draft to issue
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115189
There is no mathematical problem, but I'm uncertain about c
Hi Regina,
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 18:13 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently working on LINEST and have attached a draft to issue
> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115189
>
> There is no mathematical problem, but I'm uncertain about coding style.
> The algor
Regina Henschel wrote:
> There is no mathematical problem, but I'm uncertain about coding
> style. The algorithms work on matrices. They have a lot of parts
> which are nearly identical but the matrices are transposed. How to
> handle that?
>
Hi Regina,
I'd suggest using templates to achieve that
Hi Regina,
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 18:13 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
> I'm currently working on LINEST and have attached a draft to issue
Cool ! this is an awesome patch :-)
> There is no mathematical problem, but I'm uncertain about coding style.
And your coding style looks be
Hi all,
I'm currently working on LINEST and have attached a draft to issue
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115189
There is no mathematical problem, but I'm uncertain about coding style.
The algorithms work on matrices. They have a lot of parts which are
nearly identical but th