2010/12/8 Sebastian Spaeth :
>> Thanks Sebastian for the link. It helps. Saddly, I don't see references on
>> easter eggs for Office 2003 and later.
>
> They could just not be found as the code is closed. In contrast to LibO
> :-P
>
> Really, we are not talking virii. We are talking scrolling contr
> Thanks Sebastian for the link. It helps. Saddly, I don't see references on
> easter eggs for Office 2003 and later.
They could just not be found as the code is closed. In contrast to LibO
:-P
Really, we are not talking virii. We are talking scrolling contributor
credits on some key presses and
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Alexander Thurgood
wrote:
>
> Hi Norbert,
>
> Le 08/12/10 15:41, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit :
>
>> Seriously ? What kind of noise ? (I hate to imagine the kind of work
>> environment where the mere existence of such eggs would be cause for
>> any concern, or even - f
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
>
>
> Le 2010-12-08 12:00, Olivier Hallot a écrit :
>
> The no
> ise I had to fight in a 120.000 desktop deployment I am managing, by the
> IT security dept who almost made me write under oath that these stupidities
> are
> not a secu
Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
>
> Your IT department should not allow the use of MS products then:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter_eggs_in_Microsoft_products
> :)
> Emacs is the worst. It even contains Tetris :-).
>
> Sebastian
>
Thanks Sebastian for the link. It helps. Saddly, I don't see re
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:09:33 -0700, "Tor Lillqvist"
wrote:
> Just in case anybody is counting votes, I am against removing Easter eggs. I
> think we need more of them. And more rude comments in the source code.
In obscure languages!
Perhaps German? Ahh no wait...
pgp1ntXNd0TLY.pgp
Descripti
Your IT department should not allow the use of MS products then:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter_eggs_in_Microsoft_products
:)
Emacs is the worst. It even contains Tetris :-).
Sebastian
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Alexander Thurgood
wrote:
>
> Hi Norbert,
>
> Le 08/12/10 15:41, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit :
>
>> Seriously ? What kind of noise ? (I hate to imagine the kind of work
>> environment where the mere existence of such eggs would be cause for
>> any concern, or even - fo
Le 2010-12-08 12:00, Olivier Hallot a écrit :
The no
ise I had to fight in a 120.000 desktop deployment I am managing, by the
IT security dept who almost made me write under oath that these
stupidities are
not a security threat.
Sorry, but I had pretty tought times dealing with
Hi Norbert,
Le 08/12/10 15:41, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit :
> Seriously ? What kind of noise ? (I hate to imagine the kind of work
> environment where the mere existence of such eggs would be cause for
> any concern, or even - for that matter - cause for any attention at
> all... at least nothing
Just in case anybody is counting votes, I am against removing Easter eggs. I
think we need more of them. And more rude comments in the source code.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mail
Title: Escritorio Virtual Scinergy
Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1
Mensagem
Remetente:
Olivier Hallot
Mensagem:
Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Olivier Hallot>
Title: Escritorio Virtual Scinergy
Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1
Mensagem
Remetente:
Olivier Hallot
Mensagem:
michael.me...@novell.com wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:56 +,
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 11:09 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> the embedded
> games were -so- bad, I can't imagine anyone getting that addicted :-)
Not unless we embedd Tetris in Calc
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
___
LibreOffice
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Olivier Hallot
wrote:
> While we are here, I am happy to know we will one day remove our LO easter
> eggs.
Are 'we' ?
>
> No matter how inocuous they are (and they are), it is too often a source of
> noise in enterprise environments.
Seriously ? What kind of nois
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:56 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 07:51 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote:
> > While we are here, I am happy to know we will one day remove our LO
> > easter eggs.
>
> Kill-joy.
:-) agreed. The main problem, that I've seen with "easter eggs" is
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 07:51 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote:
> While we are here, I am happy to know we will one day remove our LO
> easter eggs.
Kill-joy.
> No matter how inocuous they are (and they are), it is too often a source
> of noise in enterprise environments.
I think the fun ones are alr
While we are here, I am happy to know we will one day remove our LO
easter eggs.
No matter how inocuous they are (and they are), it is too often a source
of noise in enterprise environments.
Just an entry in our to-do list.
Em 08-12-2010 07:20, Michael Meeks escreveu:
One way (but not the
18 matches
Mail list logo
