Hi *,
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> On 2011-02-25 at 09:02 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
>
>> Christian, is there anything on the tinderbox master side that needs
>> to be done, to have it recognize new branches?
Yes - tinderbox ignores/discards all mail with trees i
Hi Thorsten,
On 2011-02-25 at 09:02 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > We've now three more boxes sending results, see here:
> >
> > http://tinderbox.go-oo.org/MASTER/status.html
> >
> Hm, noticing the tree name is hard-coded, what about attached patch?
> Christian, is there anything on the tin
> We've now three more boxes sending results, see here:
>
> http://tinderbox.go-oo.org/MASTER/status.html
>
Hm, noticing the tree name is hard-coded, what about attached patch?
Christian, is there anything on the tinderbox master side that needs
to be done, to have it recognize new branches? Also
Hi folks,
did some rework there today, and due to popular demand, grafted the
tinbuild (plus helper) out of the bootstrap repo - it's now here:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/buildbot/
It's now using sendEmail, earlier attempts with Net::SMTP::* failed
quite badly.
We've now th
Hi Jan, *;
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> On 2011-02-17 at 00:25 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> [...]
> I see; I looked at that too after Thorsten's recommendation, but thought
> it was unable to add the X-Tinder header - my bad, but at least I
> learned Net::SMTP an
Hi Christian,
On 2011-02-17 at 00:25 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> sorry for not replying earlier
No problem at all! :-)
> > As you already have experience with what the tinder mails should
> > contain, do you think you could enhance bin/tinbuild in the bootstrap
> > repo to actually send
Hi Kendy, *,
sorry for not replying earlier
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> On 2011-02-10 at 15:34 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>>>
>> http://tinderbox.go-oo.org/MASTER/status.html
>>
>> use "master" as treename, apart from that, see
>> http://wiki.services.openoffic
Hi Christian,
On 2011-02-10 at 16:35 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> > > Wouldn't it make sense to have the N last build logs on the web
> > > somewhere, and just point to the relevant one in the tinderbox mail?
> >
> > http://tinderbox.go-oo.org/MASTER/status.html
> >
> > use "master" as treen
Oh, didn't see the link. Didn't know that it's already on the web! I'm
not sure if everybody knows that there are logs on the web, maybe you
could add this link to the tinderbox mails :)
Thomas
On 02/10/2011 04:38 PM, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> To have that log on the web would be nice (not all pers
To have that log on the web would be nice (not all persons have a big
mail account - some mail providers only give you a few megabytes at all).
I did a fresh build with a git clone from the morning and there were no
errors at all.
Thomas
On 02/10/2011 02:55 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> Would it b
Hi Christian,
On 2011-02-10 at 15:34 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> >> Would it be acceptable to get the full build log in case something goes
> >> wrong?
> >
> > Wouldn't it make sense to have the N last build logs on the web somewhere,
> > and just point to the relevant one in the tinderbo
Hi *,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> Would it be acceptable to get the full build log in case something goes
>> wrong?
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to have the N last build logs on the web somewhere,
> and just point to the relevant one in the tinderbox mail?
http://tind
> Would it be acceptable to get the full build log in case something goes
> wrong?
Wouldn't it make sense to have the N last build logs on the web somewhere, and
just point to the relevant one in the tinderbox mail?
Would it be possible to in a simple way enhance build.pl to optionally redirec
Hi,
Recently I have heard complaints that the mails from the tinderbox do
not contain the actual bug. It seems to me that the behavior of
build.pl changed a bit, it does not stop immediately after the mistake,
but tries to continue as further as possible even with just one process
(build -P1 --al
14 matches
Mail list logo
