Hi Caolan,
Ran it once again without the --enable-symols after a make clean.
Looks like things are okay now :)
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 11:51 +0530, Surendran Mahendran wrote:
>> All these were the changes in the ure folder which had cppu.
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 11:51 +0530, Surendran Mahendran wrote:
> All these were the changes in the ure folder which had cppu. Reckon any
> one of this could have fixed my issue ?
I wouldn't *think* so, would have to check again without
--enable-symbols to see if the failure comes back :-)
C.
___
Hi everyone,
On 01/25/2011 09:57 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Hmm, well it doesn't fail here FWIW. Could you autogen.sh with an extra
--enable-symbols and rm -rf cppu/unxlngx.pro and redo the trace so we
can get the exact line numbers to see if its e.g. the very first
try/catch in testUnoSetThrow
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 21:00 +0530, Surendran Mahendran wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 01/25/2011 02:20 PM, David Tardon wrote:
> >
> > Run
> >
> > build -- debugcppunit=t
> >
> > . This will run the test through gdb and create qa/gdbtrace.log that
> > you can post here.
> >
> > D.
>
> Thanks for the ti
Hi Dave,
On 01/25/2011 02:20 PM, David Tardon wrote:
Run
build -- debugcppunit=t
. This will run the test through gdb and create qa/gdbtrace.log that
you can post here.
D.
Thanks for the tip. I have pasted the gdbtrace.log in the pastebin [1].
This seems to be the problem -
#1 0x7fff
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 09:50 +0100, David Tardon wrote:
> Run
>
> build -- debugcppunit=t
>
> . This will run the test through gdb and create qa/gdbtrace.log that
> you can post here.
Oooh - that looks sweet :-)
I wonder if we could add a script wrapper to our unit testing frame
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:17:26AM +0530, surensp...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:42 AM, David Dumaresq wrote:
> >
> >
> > I suggest you take a look at the advice under The Build Failed... What can
> > I do? here, http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Nativ
On 1/25/11 6:47 AM, surensp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:42 AM, David Dumaresq wrote:
I suggest you take a look at the advice under The Build Failed... What can I
do? here, http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build
Dave
I already did that and h
Hi Dave,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:42 AM, David Dumaresq wrote:
>
>
> I suggest you take a look at the advice under The Build Failed... What can I
> do? here, http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build
>
> Dave
>
I already did that and have pasted the output of the individual
On 2011-01-24, at 8:26 PM, surensp...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am building LO after some time now. Did the usual ./g pull -r , make
> clean and then make. The build was breaking for me at cppu.
>
> '''
> build -- version: 275224
>
> =
> Building module cppu
> =
> En
Hi,
I am building LO after some time now. Did the usual ./g pull -r , make
clean and then make. The build was breaking for me at cppu.
'''
build -- version: 275224
=
Building module cppu
=
Entering /home/suren/libreoffice/libo/cppu/inc
Entering /home/suren/libreoffice/li
11 matches
Mail list logo
