On Thursday, May 19, 2011 22:12:14 Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> I think this patch is fine too. So if my sign counts you have a second.
+1 from me, which makes it third.
B.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesk
I think this patch is fine too. So if my sign counts you have a second.
Regards,
Markus
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 15:58 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > Yes, I submit the patch under LGPLv3+/MPL 1.1.
> >
> > And all further patches will be under LGPLv3+/MPL 1.1 as long as there
> > are no other needs from your side.
Excellent! Just pushed to the -3-4 branch.
http://cgit.freedesktop.o
CC'ing Regina's reply to the list...
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 21:17 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
> > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 20:00 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> could you please have a look at
> >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 20:00 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> could you please have a look at
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37326
>
> It looks not severe, but you get the error likely, if you use LINEST to
> get the coefficients of an interpolation polynomial. In thos
Hi all,
could you please have a look at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37326
It looks not severe, but you get the error likely, if you use LINEST to
get the coefficients of an interpolation polynomial. In those cases
users have often x=0 among the known points. If would be nice
