On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Aron Xu wrote:
>
>> +1 for choosing .po over .sdf or .xliff, the number of tools designed
>> to edit and/or manage .po files is much more than the other two
>> formats AFAIK.
>>
>
> +1
+1 for .po and svn (or
Hi Andras,
On 2010-12-30 at 09:13 +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
> > BTW - would it help you if we got rid of the sdf files, and instead we
> > had .po files in the l10n git repository? [For sure it would help us
> > who work with the git repos, because the sdf file format is just
> > something incr
Hi Martin,
On 2010-12-30 at 10:36 +0100, Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
> The Slovenian team will be working with sdf files (we have our own
> localization system that works with sdf, splits to po-s and finalizes
> back to sdf), so -1 from me.
What exactly your system that works with sdf does? Is it
Please bear in mind, that while working just with po's in Pootle might be a
great idea, but for teams not using Pootle sdf (or zipped po files) is the
only way to go. Or will you take one by one po file from our ftp sites for
automatic building of builds?
Lp, m.
2010/12/30 Martin Srebotnjak
> T
The Slovenian team will be working with sdf files (we have our own
localization system that works with sdf, splits to po-s and finalizes back
to sdf), so -1 from me.
Lp, m.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freed
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Aron Xu wrote:
> +1 for choosing .po over .sdf or .xliff, the number of tools designed
> to edit and/or manage .po files is much more than the other two
> formats AFAIK.
>
+1
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@li
+1 for choosing .po over .sdf or .xliff, the number of tools designed
to edit and/or manage .po files is much more than the other two
formats AFAIK.
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesk
2010.12.30. 1:05 keltezéssel, Jan Holesovsky írta:
> BTW - would it help you if we got rid of the sdf files, and instead we
> had .po files in the l10n git repository? [For sure it would help us
> who work with the git repos, because the sdf file format is just
> something incredibly terrible for
