2012/1/27 Caolán McNamara :
> On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 14:01 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
>> if it's not done, then i agree we should revert it asap;
>> pushed to libreoffice-3-5:
>>
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-5&id=7fbfed6539d607b34fb19c48ea418b2e16454de2
>
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 14:01 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> if it's not done, then i agree we should revert it asap;
> pushed to libreoffice-3-5:
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-5&id=7fbfed6539d607b34fb19c48ea418b2e16454de2
I'm happy with the code reversion,
2012/1/27 Petr Mladek :
> Cedric Bosdonnat píše v Pá 27. 01. 2012 v 13:14 +0100:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> if happens that the changes I made a few months ago aren't really mature
>> and will need more love. I reverted them in master, and it would be cool
>> if someone could review / cherry-pick it in 3.5 a
Cedric Bosdonnat píše v Pá 27. 01. 2012 v 13:14 +0100:
> Hi all,
>
> if happens that the changes I made a few months ago aren't really mature
> and will need more love. I reverted them in master, and it would be cool
> if someone could review / cherry-pick it in 3.5 and 3.5.0.
>
> http://cgit.fre
On 27/01/12 13:14, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> if happens that the changes I made a few months ago aren't really mature
> and will need more love. I reverted them in master, and it would be cool
> if someone could review / cherry-pick it in 3.5 and 3.5.0.
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org
Hi all,
if happens that the changes I made a few months ago aren't really mature
and will need more love. I reverted them in master, and it would be cool
if someone could review / cherry-pick it in 3.5 and 3.5.0.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=e9ec6d58b58739ce43ff563fd78c
