On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 12:04 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> The attached patch fixes the crasher reported in the following bug:
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37226
And if possible. I'd like to have two more sign-off's so that we can
put this in for 3.4. It's a crasher bug, so
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 15:12 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
> Anyway +1 from me regardless of which version of the patch ( really
> referring the patch I attached as *mine* is rich ;-) I only omitted
> some changes you did )
Thanks Noel. Incidentally, I accidentally pushed mine to the -3-4
branch al
Hi Kohei
On 18/05/11 12:52, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:08 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
[...]
So, we (Rafael, Norbert, Joseph and I) talked about this last night on
IRC, and one question raised was whether or not boost::bind allows
pointers to data members rather than member funct
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:08 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
> On 17/05/11 17:04, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > The attached patch fixes the crasher reported in the following bug:
> >
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37226
> >
> > and also several other usage of standard algori
On 17/05/11 17:04, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Hi there,
The attached patch fixes the crasher reported in the following bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37226
and also several other usage of standard algorithms which I believe is
incorrect, since the existing code passes the result o
Hi there,
The attached patch fixes the crasher reported in the following bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37226
and also several other usage of standard algorithms which I believe is
incorrect, since the existing code passes the result of an evaluation
which is always boolean (u
