Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] warining elimination

2011-09-01 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 06:48:50PM +0200, Jenei Gábor wrote: > Yes,naturally it was only by mistake, so you can make it to be the old. Done. pgpED0rTebcU8.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org ht

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] warining elimination

2011-09-01 Thread Jenei Gábor
Yes,naturally it was only by mistake, so you can make it to be the old. 2011. 09. 01. 18:14 keltezéssel, Korrawit Pruegsanusak írta: Hello Jenei, * On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 15:34 +0200, Jenei Gábor wrote: Here is a patch to avoid compile time warnings It seems that your patch has touched the lic

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] warining elimination

2011-09-01 Thread Korrawit Pruegsanusak
Hello Jenei, * On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 15:34 +0200, Jenei Gábor wrote: > Here is a patch to avoid compile time warnings It seems that your patch has touched the license header in svtools/source/filter/wmf/enhwmf.cxx. IMHO we should revert this part. Best Regards, -- Korrawit Pruegsanusak

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] warining elimination

2011-09-01 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 15:34 +0200, Jenei Gábor wrote: > Hello, > > Here is a patch to avoid compile time warnings Looks fine, we get screwed a bit because sal_Int32 is an "int" on x86_64 and "long" on x86 which triggers some of these. And they're inside debug mode I think in this case. The alter