At 10:14am -0500 Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
So, the idea behind this easy hack task is *not* to convert
rtl::OUString to OUString by using "using ::rtl::OUString" per se. The
idea behind it is to remove using namespace rtl, and if that causes
build breakage because of the use of non-
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 01:45 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> Hullo List,
>
> A simpleton patch to convert the more sane using ::rtl::* syntax.
Hi Kevin,
So, the idea behind this easy hack task is *not* to convert
rtl::OUString to OUString by using "using ::rtl::OUString" per se. The
idea behind it
Hullo List,
A simpleton patch to convert the more sane using ::rtl::* syntax.
Kevin
0001-Remove-using-namespace-rtl.patch.xz
Description: application/xz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailm
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:53:32 -0500
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:30 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 10:11 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:26 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> > > > 2) must we remove all the "rtl::" stuff ?
> > >
> >
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:30 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 10:11 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:26 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> > > 2) must we remove all the "rtl::" stuff ?
> >
> > If you mean "using namespace rtl;", yes, because that could cause
>
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:30:45 +
Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 10:11 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:26 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> > > 2) must we remove all the "rtl::" stuff ?
> -using namespace rtl;
> which looks fine,
+1
> +using ::rtl::OU
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 10:11 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:26 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> > 2) must we remove all the "rtl::" stuff ?
>
> If you mean "using namespace rtl;", yes, because that could cause
> conflict between com::sun::star::uno::Reference and rtl::Reference.
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:26 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is the first try with this easyhack.
> Could you tell me
> 1) if my patch is ok ? (I can push it myself)
Yes, it looks good to me. As long as it builds fine I'm all for it.
> 2) must we remove all the "rtl::" stuff ?
If y
Hello,
Here is the first try with this easyhack.
Could you tell me
1) if my patch is ok ? (I can push it myself)
2) must we remove all the "rtl::" stuff ?
Julien.
commit 9c2bd745cde4a6d635b0f0083d40f702ce1e66cc
Author: Julien Nabet
Date: Thu Feb 24 15:22:42 2011 +0100
Remove "using names