On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 11:40 -0800, julien2412 wrote:
> There was an extra semicolon after the while on the patch. Even if i re read
> several times the code, I just missed it too and needed gdb to see it ! Now
> it works better :-)
*groan*, that was dumb of me.
> Do you want to commit/push it you
There was an extra semicolon after the while on the patch. Even if i re read
several times the code, I just missed it too and needed gdb to see it ! Now
it works better :-)
Do you want to commit/push it yourself on master or do you want me to do it
(of course I put you as the author) ?
Would it be
I just finished to compile.
There's no errors in console but when I clicked on Preview, I've got no
response as if there was a infinite loop (I've just waited 20 seconds not
minutes so perhaps I'm wrong :-)).
I must go to my job so I don't have time for the moment to gdb this part.
Julien.
--
Vi
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 12:33 -0800, julien2412 wrote:
> You're right Caolan, I checked there :
> http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/map/erase
> I didn't know that it was a recent feature, just thought it was useful, so I
> didn't think about checking it existed :-)
>
> I'm trying right now
You're right Caolan, I checked there :
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/map/erase
I didn't know that it was a recent feature, just thought it was useful, so I
didn't think about checking it existed :-)
I'm trying right now to find a solution another way.
Julien
PS : I use gcc (Debian 4.
On 01/16/2012 06:12 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Does this work ? I worry (maybe I'm out of date on this one?) that
std::map::erase only returns an iterator in C++11x not C++98 which we
still support.
Its a C++11 extension.
Stephan
___
LibreOffice mail
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 11:17 -0800, julien2412 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I propose the attached patch for fdo#44040 (see
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55580)
> Since I could have missed something, I would like your opinion about this.
Does this work ? I worry (maybe I'm out of date on
Hello,
I propose the attached patch for fdo#44040 (see
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55580)
Since I could have missed something, I would like your opinion about this.
Julien
(I can commit and push it on master if it's ok)
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentf
