Hi Michael,
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 17:54 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> i hereby request protection of the following comment species:
>
> //JP 06.01.98: MUSS noch optimiert werden!!!
Lol :-)
> the handful of these comments are of enormous cultural value to Writer
> developers which would
On 05/12/11 11:10, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 00:08 +0100, Philipp Weissenbacher wrote:
>> But then, what constitutes an old comment? Very often I found that the
>> "JP with a date" comments were obviously added _after_ the original
>> comment.
>
> Really - trying to de
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 00:08 +0100, Philipp Weissenbacher wrote:
> >Lol :-) I think Bjoern is just joking - we're well rid of that mess.
> > We'll soon re-discover the fragile bits of code after we change them in
> > future ;->
>
> Well I thought so already. Maybe we indeed should add a ma
Hi,
From Björn's message:
> Hmm, in the future, maybe just adding a "[very old comment]" to it could be
> helpful. But no need to retroactively seek though old translations IMHO.
Okay, won't do this then for Philipp's translations. Anyway, what
constitutes a [very old comment], would that be any
Hi,
On 2 December 2011 13:06, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Astron,
>
> On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 11:15 +0100, Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote:
>> > O, you removed all the "JP: XX.XX.199X" markers, which were always a
>> > warning to me to step very carefully as it meant "there be dragons" to me
>> > ;)
Hi Astron,
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 11:15 +0100, Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote:
> > O, you removed all the "JP: XX.XX.199X" markers, which were always a
> > warning to me to step very carefully as it meant "there be dragons" to me ;)
>
> Uhm, okay. Should we, as in: I, add them back in? Or should
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:15:27AM +0100, Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote:
> > O, you removed all the "JP: XX.XX.199X" markers, which were always a
> > warning to me to step very carefully as it meant "there be dragons" to me ;)
>
> Uhm, okay. Should we, as in: I, add them back in? Or should they
Hi Björn,
> O, you removed all the "JP: XX.XX.199X" markers, which were always a
> warning to me to step very carefully as it meant "there be dragons" to me ;)
Uhm, okay. Should we, as in: I, add them back in? Or should they be
translated as "here be dragons" (or alternatively: "here be JOEs"
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:33:12PM +0100, Philipp Weissenbacher wrote:
> In doclay.cxx I translated 'Umlauf' with 'flow', I hope that's correct.
> I also tried my best to re-translate some of the close-to-gibberish
> English comments (knowing German helps a lot with these).
O, you removed all
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 15:36 -0500, August Sodora wrote:
> Heads up, everything that is in automation/ or basic/app is about to go away.
Ah ! - it would be quite a good idea to make 'bin/find-german-comments'
complain vigorously about these special cases (perhaps) to avoid
translators spen
Apologies, this was meant to go to Eike's previous email regarding
Date/Time constructors.
August Sodora
aug...@gmail.com
(201) 280-8138
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:36 PM, August Sodora wrote:
> Heads up, everything that is in automation/ or basic/app is about to go away.
>
> August Sodora
> aug.
Heads up, everything that is in automation/ or basic/app is about to go away.
August Sodora
aug...@gmail.com
(201) 280-8138
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Philipp Weissenbacher
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Another patch to translate docftn.cxx, docglbl.cxx, docglos.cxx and
> doclay.cxx.
>
> In d
12 matches
Mail list logo
