Hello,
On 31/01/12 17:10, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Interesting (in a world with infinite time); would the mingw
> cross-compile be call-catcher-able such that we could get a more precise
> and comprehensive list ?
Yes, at the level of callcatcher 1.1.3, I added the support for gnu
assembler f
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 16:10 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 13:21 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:15 +, Noel Power wrote:
> > > cc'ing Caolán as he might be interested because it doesn't turn up in
> > > the unused.easy
> >
> > Its windows only co
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 13:21 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:15 +, Noel Power wrote:
> > cc'ing Caolán as he might be interested because it doesn't turn up in
> > the unused.easy
>
> Its windows only code, and callcatcher can only see what gets compiled
> as its just a
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:15 +, Noel Power wrote:
> cc'ing Caolán as he might be interested because it doesn't turn up in
> the unused.easy
Its windows only code, and callcatcher can only see what gets compiled
as its just a compiler wrapper and I run it under Linux.
C.
__
Hi Christina
On 31/01/12 10:43, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
Hi,
ImplSalLogFontToFontA() seems to be unused. I don't have a Windows
build environment I couldn't test whether it really builds after
removing the method. But I don't see why it shouldn't...
Christina
I'd say commit it, can't see this
Hi,
ImplSalLogFontToFontA() seems to be unused. I don't have a Windows build
environment I couldn't test whether it really builds after removing the
method. But I don't see why it shouldn't...
Christina
>From 053a691750697916fd5cb176bec886b6da13b630 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christina Ro
