On 12/04/11 19:44, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
Removed last occurences of _USE_UNO, built successfully and pushed.
Christina
great and thanks for your excellent efforts !!!
Noel
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://li
Removed last occurences of _USE_UNO, built successfully and pushed.
Christina
Am 12.04.2011 10:49, schrieb Noel Power:
On 11/04/11 15:55, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Noel Power wrote:
As far as I understand the code it consists merely of test calls
to functions in order to see if they return a v
Hello
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 19:27, Christina Roßmanith
wrote:
> Is there a way to search for all commits I've done so far? I'll finish
that, of course!
Maybe using search box in the top-right of the page like this works for you?
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/log/?qt=author&
_USE_UNO: I thought, that I had removed everything #ifdef'ed with
_USE_UNO. BUT I've found some occurences in ./basic. Is there a way to
search for all commits I've done so far? I'll finish that, of course!
Christina
Am 12.04.2011 10:49, schrieb Noel Power:
On 11/04/11 15:55, Thorsten Behrens
On 11/04/11 15:55, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Noel Power wrote:
As far as I understand the code it consists merely of test calls
to functions in order to see if they return a valid result. I'm
quite sure that you already know whether it has side effects or
not... I vote for "it hasn't", but I'm abs
Noel Power wrote:
> >As far as I understand the code it consists merely of test calls
> >to functions in order to see if they return a valid result. I'm
> >quite sure that you already know whether it has side effects or
> >not... I vote for "it hasn't", but I'm absolutely not sure
> nah, just seems
Hi Christina
On 21/03/11 22:28, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
nd calls nothing that does that ?
As far as I understand the code it consists merely of test calls to
functions in order to see if they return a valid result. I'm quite
sure that you already know whether it has side effects or not... I
Am 21.03.2011 18:10, schrieb Michael Meeks:
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 13:44 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
I've removed all blocks of code #ifdef'ed by _OLD_FILE_IMPL because it
was never defined. It builds successfully. Could someone please review
to make sure that nothing was deleted accidental
Am 21.03.2011 18:10, schrieb Michael Meeks:
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 13:44 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
I've removed all blocks of code #ifdef'ed by _OLD_FILE_IMPL because it
was never defined. It builds successfully. Could someone please review
to make sure that nothing was deleted accidental
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 13:44 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
> I've removed all blocks of code #ifdef'ed by _OLD_FILE_IMPL because it
> was never defined. It builds successfully. Could someone please review
> to make sure that nothing was deleted accidentally?
@@ -427,7 +425,7 @@ void OslStrea
Hi,
I've removed all blocks of code #ifdef'ed by _OLD_FILE_IMPL because it
was never defined. It builds successfully. Could someone please review
to make sure that nothing was deleted accidentally?
Thank you,
Christina
>From 665f2746fe89509f5e3e44ce9f263b5befe3cc34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Fr
11 matches
Mail list logo
