Kevin Hunter wrote:
> Further (with exceptions, of course), automagic tools provide a much
> more consistent and at least acceptable-by-all metric for how code
> should look. (And I would argue that how code looks via the
> squint-test is very *much* pertinent for longer term gathering of
> new de
Kevin Hunter wrote:
> Further (with exceptions, of course), automagic tools provide a much
> more consistent and at least acceptable-by-all metric for how code
> should look. (And I would argue that how code looks via the
> squint-test is very *much* pertinent for longer term gathering of
> new de
At 9:47am -0400 Thu, 04 Nov 2010, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
I'm sorry if [the request not to make any formatting changes] was not
too obvious from the EasyHacks page - do you think adding something
like this to the preamble would make it more clear:
"please avoid larger reformatting of the code fo
Hullo LO Git committers,
Patches against calc/.../miscdlgs/ to remove non-compiled code and other
minor refactors. Patches created with:
$ git format-patch --patience -19 -o ~/tmp/easy_hack_non_compiled
$ cd ~/tmp/
# tar -cjf easy_hack_non_compiled{.tbz,}
$ sha1sum easy_hack_non_compiled.tbz
