Hi Matúš,
On Thursday, 2012-07-26 12:04:03 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> > There's one reason why to keep this or a similar mechanism: the build
> > would fail in the unit test when you have a Telepathy enabled office
> > running. Which in future might be the default case ;-)
>
> That's unfortunat
On 26 July 2012 11:23, Eike Rathke wrote:
>> > I am not sure what for was that.. to be able to run unit test while
>> > real LibO is running ?
>>
>> Yes, shouldn't be used in any other case.
>>
>> > Would we want that ?
>>
>> Well, apparently I needed it somehow during that time.. problem is you
>
Hi Matúš,
On Thursday, 2012-07-26 11:17:41 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> > I am not sure what for was that.. to be able to run unit test while
> > real LibO is running ?
>
> Yes, shouldn't be used in any other case.
>
> > Would we want that ?
>
> Well, apparently I needed it somehow during that
Hi Matúš,
On Thursday, 2012-07-26 09:39:43 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> I thought that 1-1 collaboration works quite like expected (you get a
> file on start.. now also you see contacts dialog updated when someone
> goes on/offline (both does not seem to work for gmail accounts
> though!)),
> So I
Hi all,
To let you know that I am still alive, now something about unit test:
I thought that 1-1 collaboration works quite like expected (you get a
file on start.. now also you see contacts dialog updated when someone
goes on/offline (both does not seem to work for gmail accounts
though!)),
So I w