https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82580
jan iversen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:4.4.0|ToBeReviewed
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82580
--- Comment #11 from Fernando Montes ---
Darn ok. I will find another easy hack to be my first
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
LibreOffice mailin
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82580
--- Comment #10 from Fedor ---
Still not need help.
Eclipse searchs well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@li
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82580
--- Comment #9 from SirFernanders ---
any chance you need help on this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82580
--- Comment #8 from Tor Lillqvist ---
It is enough to say you are working on this. If somebody else (another GSoC
hopeful?) is rude enough to jump onto this task just at the same time (for a
few weeks), we will notice, and take that as a s
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82580
--- Comment #7 from Fedor ---
Assign this bug to me. I think it is good start before refactoring god objects
at gsoc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82580
Tor Lillqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|fedor...@mail.ru|libreoffice-b...@lists.free
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82580
Fedor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |fedor...@mail.ru
|deskt
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82580
--- Comment #5 from Tor Lillqvist ---
That is madness. We can't cross-compile a complete LibreOffice because the
reverse-engineered headers provided by mingw-w64 are incomplete. And those
headers have a very long history. So you expect us to be a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82580
--- Comment #4 from Noel Grandin ---
Personally I think we should do what Cygwin have done and create our own copy
of the win32 header that only contains the definitions we need, thus minimizing
the odds of conflict.
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82580
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Arnhold ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> 2) in some cases it can be avoided to have the Win32 type
>and the LO type visible in the same LO source file
>by not including both the defining LO and Win32 headers
Note
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82580
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|EasyHack DifficultyBeginner |EasyHack DifficultyBeginner
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82580
--- Comment #1 from Tor Lillqvist ---
One note, that I sadly think needs to be spelled out: Please don't attempt to
do this unless you actually have Windows, Visual Studio, etc and are able to
build LibreOffice on Windows. Don't submit changes wi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82580
Michael Stahl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||EasyHack DifficultyBeginner
14 matches
Mail list logo
