Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-03-08 Thread t...@libreoffice.org
I wrote: > I'll mull over if we can somehow prevent that for this test... > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/50978/ - can you try if that fixes your issue? Cheers, -- Thorsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ LibreOffice mailing lis

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-03-08 Thread t...@libreoffice.org
Hi Luke, this one indeed clears it up: Luke Benes wrote: > [pid 24144] write(2, "gpg: can't connect to the agent: File name too > long", 51) = 51 > This is quite unexpected. There's a thread about it on the upstream gpg list: https://lists.gt.net/gnupg/users/79522 I'll mull over if we can someh

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-03-04 Thread t...@libreoffice.org
Luke Benes wrote: > Let me know if there is anything else I can do to help. > Hi Luke, terribly sorry, but the BTs still don't give any useful hint at what's going wrong. Are you building with optimisation? Since appopen.cxx:240 really contains no throwing (but the called function decryptGpgSessi

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-02-04 Thread t...@libreoffice.org
Luke Benes wrote: > This was on my 64-bit Ubuntu 17.10 box. Anything useful here? > Hi Luke, no, not really - could you please do the 'catch throw' part, too, from my earlier mail? And then single-step inside appopen.cxx, until you hit an exception? Cheers, -- Thorsten signature.asc Descripti

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-02-01 Thread t...@libreoffice.org
Hi Luke, Luke Benes wrote: > This is not a 32/64 bit issue, as I'm seeing this on my 64 bit > Ubuntu 17.10 system. The full, unedited log built with > SAL_LOG="+WARN.+INFO.xmlsecurity+INFO.comphelper.crypto" > Hmm, nothing really helpful standing out there. If you please could: make CppunitTest_