Licensing my contributions

2012-05-11 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
All of my past & future contributions to LibreOffice may be licensed under the MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license. Cheers, Suren. -- Cheers, ~Suren. Co-Founder, Goyaka Labs http://suren.in http://twitter.com/suren skype: pingsuren Ph: 9742077760 ___ LibreOffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Build issue with cppu

2011-01-29 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hi Caolan, Ran it once again without the --enable-symols after a make clean. Looks like things are okay now :) On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 11:51 +0530, Surendran Mahendran wrote: >> All these were the changes in the ure folder which had cppu.

Re: [Libreoffice] Build issue with cppu

2011-01-24 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hi Dave, On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:42 AM, David Dumaresq wrote: > > > I suggest you take a look at the advice under The Build Failed... What can I > do? here, http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build > > Dave > I already did that and have pasted the output of the individual

[Libreoffice] Build issue with cppu

2011-01-24 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hi, I am building LO after some time now. Did the usual ./g pull -r , make clean and then make. The build was breaking for me at cppu. ''' build -- version: 275224 = Building module cppu = Entering /home/suren/libreoffice/libo/cppu/inc Entering /home/suren/libreoffice/li

Re: [Libreoffice] dmake: Error code 1, while making '../unxlngx6.pro/misc/rsc_svt'

2010-12-14 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hi, Yes, A pull and subsequent build worked fine. Thanks for the help :D On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 19:42 +0530, surensp...@gmail.com wrote: >> I had the exact same error with svtools when I was building as well >> today. I am

Re: [Libreoffice] dmake: Error code 1, while making '../unxlngx6.pro/misc/rsc_svt'

2010-12-14 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
I had the exact same error with svtools when I was building as well today. I am building it on Ubuntu 10.10 64 bit version. Any pointers on how to go about fixing it ? Thanks, ~Suren On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:59 PM, imacat wrote: > Dear all, > >    Hi.  This is imacat from Taiwan.  I tried to b

Re: [Libreoffice] FOSDEM foo ...

2010-12-05 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
HI Michael, On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Suren, >e more time for the patch to mature ? > >        Wow - it's always the right time to apply for a FOSDEM paper :-) just > whack your name in the wiki, and encourage your friends to come. > > ... >        Incidentally; th

Re: [Libreoffice] Suggestion needed for External Edit functionality.

2010-12-02 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hey Thorsten , On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > > I had initially intended to reply even earlier, was playing with > your patch yesterday - sadly, there was much preemption. So here's a > little intermezzo - great work so far, stuff looks promising! I understand. There h

Re: [Libreoffice] Suggestion needed for External Edit functionality.

2010-11-30 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hi everyone, After few sleepless nights spent grokking and with quite a big deal help from IRC and the list, have come up with the first cuts working version of the External Edit functionality[1]. Have attached the patches rebased against the latest master. Would love to hear reviews/suggestions/i

[Libreoffice] Greasemonkey script for bugzilla page

2010-11-23 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hi, I have made the greasemonkey script required in the easy hacks page. Please set this bug status to be NEEDINFO - https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31853, so that I can improve the greasemonkey and resend it ! -- regards Suren Learning < Doing Learn By doing. highlight.user.js De

Re: [Libreoffice] Suggestion needed for External Edit functionality.

2010-11-21 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hi Thorsten, Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > surensp...@gmail.com wrote: >> 1) Making it work in all OS/platforms: >> [...] >> > Hi Suren, > > wow, great progress! For the editing, one easy way out would be to > use the SystemShellExecut

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] More patches for Base

2010-11-15 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hey Wols, >> On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:51:04 +, Wols Lists >> wrote: > By the way, is there an easy git command to squash two patches together? > > Cheers, > Wol Got to know about the git-squashing from Spaetz. Works really nice for me. Hope this helps :) [1] http://book.git-scm.com/4_interac

Re: [Libreoffice] Suggestion needed for External Edit functionality.

2010-11-14 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Apologies for the blank mail earlier. Accidentally hit the send button :( -- regards Suren Learning < Doing Learn By doing. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Suggestion needed for External Edit functionality.

2010-11-14 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hi Thorsten, First of all, Many thanks for all the help through out :) I have attached the patches ( I have re-based with the latest origin/master as of Sunday Night IST ) for the First cuts of the "Edit with External Application" functionality. I have seen it working nicely in Gnome based (just

Re: [Libreoffice] Suggestion needed for External Edit functionality.

2010-11-14 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > surensp...@gmail.com wrote: >> 2) The thread is not blocking as expected when osl_ExecuteProcess is >> called and since it does not block, no other threads get executed. So >> back to the problem of LO window hang

Re: [Libreoffice] Suggestion needed for External Edit functionality.

2010-11-12 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hi Thorsten, > It Did, It did. When I Hit compile and when it worked I was litreally > jumping in my seat. :) Will clean up code and submit the patch soon > enough. Thanks for the help very much :) > I have attached the new snippet I have come up with. There are few issues I faced. 1) The postUs

Re: [Libreoffice] Suggestion needed for External Edit functionality.

2010-11-10 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hi Thorsten, On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: >> > Hi Suren, > > since you already create a separate thread for the editing - just > fire it off, and send the main app a msg - like here: > > desktop/source/app/officeipcthread.cxx:289 > > (you'll probably replace STATIC_LI

[Libreoffice] Suggestion needed for External Edit functionality.

2010-11-10 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hi Everyone, This is regarding this bug - https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30508 Goal: To be able to open an image(Graphic item) in an external application for advanced editing What is already done: Added a menu item to right click popup on the graphic, coupled the menu item with a me

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED, partial] Re: [Patch] German Translation and dev-install build improvement

2010-11-05 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hey Caolan, On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 22:22 +0530, surensp...@gmail.com wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Just resending the patches with the suggested changes from other mailing >> threads >> >> Patch 1 : German T

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Building LibreOffice in Ubuntu Maverick

2010-11-03 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
HI Michael, On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 02:31 +0530, surensp...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> But when I try to run make dev-install again in the rawbuild >> directory, it could not do so because of these errors - >> h

Re: [Libreoffice] German Translations in Writer module

2010-11-03 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hi Miklos, On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote: >> @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ >>   / >> >>  /** >> -Achtung: Ab sofort sind in diesem File ke

Re: [Libreoffice] Bulding problem, Linux 32 bit, Ubuntu 10.10

2010-11-03 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hi , I had a similar problem in my ubuntu as well. A little debugging into install log showed me that there were issues with /usr/lib/libdb-4.7.so in ubuntu 10.10. I compared the files in rawbuild/solver/330/unx*/lib/libdb-4.7. They were different. Thats why everything else seemed to work but for

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] sc: fix parenthesis mixup

2010-11-03 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hey Sebastian, I did the push in rawbuild directory and not in build directory. This specific file within clone even was not in git repo. Not sure how that is possible though. Thanks, ~Suren On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:12:08 +0530, "

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] sc: fix parenthesis mixup

2010-11-02 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
I also faced the issue. I just had to add a paranthesis to fix it and proceed with the build. But when I thought of submitting the patch, that ucalc.cxx file was not git revisioned. Just for knowledge, How are these files generated ? Thanks, ~Suren On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Caolán McNamara

[Libreoffice] Building LibreOffice in Ubuntu Maverick

2010-10-30 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hi, Have successfully completed a build on Ubuntu 10.10. Thanks to a lot of guys from IRC and mailing list for helping out :) My earlier builds were taking very long times and were failing for one reason or other. I decided to try out --with-system-libs ( another suggestion from IRC) and it worke

Re: [Libreoffice] First time Build issues on Ubuntu

2010-10-29 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hi, On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:34 +0530, surensp...@gmail.com wrote: >> I am new to Libreoffice and I was trying to build Libreoffice for the >> first time. I ended up with this error - [1]. I figured it might be >> b

[Libreoffice] First time Build issues on Ubuntu

2010-10-28 Thread surensp...@gmail.com
Hi, I am new to Libreoffice and I was trying to build Libreoffice for the first time. I ended up with this error - [1]. I figured it might be because the file might not have included algorithm as the 'lower_bound' function that was said missing is provided by algorithm header. I naively added a