Hi again *,
After a long hiatus, this service is back on the air. I swapped out the
bad RAM for some good RAM, and hooray, we've got a fresh cppcheck report
at http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ . I also hacked in sortable.js
for clickable, sortable column headings.
My hope is that this is use
Hi *. Sorry to say that it appears a hardware problem (bad RAM) has put
a stop to cppcheck's 5 hour report runs that get pushed to
http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ . I'm RMA-ing the RAM today, and
hopefully we'll see the replacements in a few weeks, if not sooner.
Sorry for not writing sooner
Howdy *,
So, if you browse to http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ to see the
cppcheck run, you'll notice a few things:
* Less CSS.
* Sortable columns!
Odd problems:
* You may notice some "blanks" in the source code links, like this:
http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/680.html#line-462 . I be
On 02/17/11 01:50, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 20:09 -0800, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
>> Hi Caolán,
>>
>> So cppcheck can't find the headers it needs? Is this a bug in cppcheck,
>> or LO's construction of header file paths? And how many examples of
>> cppcheck false positi
On 02/16/11 12:43, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 13:26 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> With the last git version of cppcheck, I've got in the master branch
>> writer/sw/source/ui/dbui this :
>> [./dbmgr.cxx:222]: (style) Unused private function
>> 'SwConnectionDisposedL
On 12/14/10 12:13, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ is running cppcheck 1.46. No
> segfaults so far. As much as folks want it to run the git version, the
> segfault party wasn't fun, sorry.
>
> Cheers,
> Jesse Adelman
> Bold and Busted LLC
> htt
Please stop setting up autoreplies that reply to mailing lists... Dr.
Frank Peters. :)
--- Begin Message ---
I am currently travelling with limited access to email and will
read your message when I return on Dec 16.
Regards
Frank Peters
--
Dr. Frank Peters | Documentation and Learning Manager
P
Hi all,
http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ is running cppcheck 1.46. No
segfaults so far. As much as folks want it to run the git version, the
segfault party wasn't fun, sorry.
Cheers,
Jesse Adelman
Bold and Busted LLC
http://www.boldandbusted.com/
P.S. The current report has 1.45 listed as t
Uh, can you un-subscribe/filter this person until he returns or asks to
re-subscribe? I got this auto reply directly after posting my previous
message to the list... :/ He says he won't be back until the 15th... Thanks.
This must be getting sent to everyone who posts? Or maybe I'm special.
--- Beg
Hi, all. I read part of the thread "LibreOffice WikiHelp" and recognized
that there are a large body of MediaWiki Extensions that might help.
However, rather than ask to try it out on your systems, I'd like to try
them on my own, against the MediaWiki database backing help.libreoffice.org.
Wikiped
On 11/28/10 11:27, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
> On 11/28/10 03:00, Julien Nabet wrote:
>> Hello Jesse,
>>
>> I "git updated" cppcheck and it succeeded to scan the whole vcl
>> directory but above all, i noticed this in the logs :
>>
>> ser...@serval:~/cppcheck/cppcheck$ git log
>> commit 00da
On 11/28/10 03:00, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Hello Jesse,
>
> I "git updated" cppcheck and it succeeded to scan the whole vcl
> directory but above all, i noticed this in the logs :
>
> ser...@serval:~/cppcheck/cppcheck$ git log
> commit 00da0adf25b122fcfb7a2f892497f1785b01f43a
> Author: Daniel Marja
On 11/27/10 23:47, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
> Ugh. I was wonder why the report hadn't updated in a while, so I looked
> at dmesg, and...
>
> [769748.123672] cppcheck[3299]: segfault at bf12dff8 ip 080b6cb4 sp
> bf12dff0 error 6 in cppcheck[8048000+c4000]
> [770896.363343] cppcheck[6124]: s
Ugh. I was wonder why the report hadn't updated in a while, so I looked
at dmesg, and...
[769748.123672] cppcheck[3299]: segfault at bf12dff8 ip 080b6cb4 sp
bf12dff0 error 6 in cppcheck[8048000+c4000]
[770896.363343] cppcheck[6124]: segfault at bf12dff8 ip 080b6cb4 sp
bf12dff0 error 6 in cppcheck[
I've added some code to my report generation scripts to insert the
cppcheck git sha1 hash in the title of the report. I had to do a bit of
shell trickery to get Gentoo's Portage to give me the hash of the
installed cppcheck. It is in the middle of a report run now, so probably
in 4-6 hours from thi
Hi Julien,
It is the "git" version of cppchcek, which I checkout every few days via
Portage. If you find false positives, you should let the cppcheck folks
know, and they'll remove it or otherwise correct it (or tell you that it
isn't a false positive ;) ).
Which "tracker" are you referencing? cp
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:38 -0800, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
> > Howdy. To help with EasyHack "cppcheck cleanliness", I've set up
> > automated reporting on http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ . Here will
> > live a report generated from a complete scan of the entire LO codebase,
> > gener
I should also caution you that, at least for my Firefox, this page may
make your browser creak under its weight. Another reason to crush bugs!
:)
Cheers,
Jesse Adelman
Bold and Busted LLC
Brisbane, CA USA
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:38 -0800, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
> Howdy. To help with Easy
Howdy. To help with EasyHack "cppcheck cleanliness", I've set up
automated reporting on http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ . Here will
live a report generated from a complete scan of the entire LO codebase,
generated every 4-6 hours, against a fresh update from the various git
repos with LO code
the resulting git
> patches at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30794
>
> Please someone (I assigned to Kendy as per IRC discussion, so that would
> be him :-)) apply these patches.
>
> The script is fine, but my /bin/sh did not like "set -o posix" so I made
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:10 -0700, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:43 -0500, "Norbert Thiebaud"
> wrote:
> > Ok so I don't have a blog... but We have a brand new wiki...
> >
> > So I started a page, intended to help prospective developper to get
> > acquainted with the bui
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:43 -0500, "Norbert Thiebaud"
wrote:
> Ok so I don't have a blog... but We have a brand new wiki...
>
> So I started a page, intended to help prospective developper to get
> acquainted with the build and with git...
>
> This is quite fresh in my mind... since I've learn tha
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:47 +0200, "Thorsten Behrens"
wrote:
> Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > Aha, what it boils down to, right, is that the emacs mode lines in that
> > sw/source/filter/ww8/ww8atr.cxx and friends won't be used by emacs
> > seeing as its neither pattern.
> >
> So let's remove them - ad
Hi LibreOffice devs,
OK, here's the next version (0.7).
This version has some user interface improvements, and probably some
improved bugs. ;)
add-modelines takes arguments:
$ ./add-modelines -?
./add-modelines: illegal option -- ?
Usage: ./add-modelines [-z] [-s ""] [-p ]
So, now you can:
*
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 20:24 +0100, "Caolán McNamara"
wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 11:41 -0700, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
> > Howdy, all. It took some effort for this SysAdmin to craft a shell
> > script to meet this "EasyHack",
>
> The principal looks good. Here's a edge-case test file tho
Howdy. I was asked to post a message here to kick off a discussion of
test script coordination. I'm volunteering to help with them because a)
it's simple, and b) I'm simple.
I know shell, as you can see from the add-modelines script I just
submitted, and I'm told that StarBASIC is "as easy", and t
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 20:44 +0100, "Caolán McNamara"
wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 12:34 -0700, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
> > I think this feature calls for a script getopts-style option where one
> > can select to either not clobber exsiting modelines (the default) or
> > remove and repla
Hi Caolán,
The EasyHack wasn't clear on whether the script should wipe out any
existing modelines. In the interests of caution, I had it back off if
they were present. However, I can see that overwritting existing
modelines is needed, especially if the script is to be at all useful
after it's firs
28 matches
Mail list logo
