Hi there,
Because of the significant update of features and bug fixes, I was
trying an update of Libreoffice Moztrap from 1.0.X to 1.3.7 in last
couple of weeks. Mostly the work was to merge our own patches and
resolve data compatible issues.
After days of testing, I think it is now a good time t
involved.
Best wishes,
Yifan
>>> Jonathan Aquilina 11/09/12 3:12 PM >>>
Yifan web based support is already in the works. Michael Meeks is conducting
that work, but its not ready for use yet.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Yi Fan Jiang wrote:
Hi Randolph,
Unfortunately my fi
Hi Randolph,
Unfortunately my first response is NO.
The development might be for fun, but I didn't see a persuasive
reason of why we need one browser in a office suite. IMHO, in that case
we seem not to improve foreseeable usability, functionality or productivity
to the suite, will we?
Instead
Hi Tor,
The problem has gone with r8 ndk :) Thanks for your great help and explanation!
Best wishes,
Yifan
>>> Yi Fan Jiang 07/26/12 4:06 PM >>>
Hi Tor,
>>> Tor Lillqvist 07/26/12 3:46 PM >>>
> >> This shows that it is not a cross-compilation.
>
Hi Tor,
>>> Tor Lillqvist 07/26/12 3:46 PM >>>
> >> This shows that it is not a cross-compilation.
> >
> > Thanks! I see, shall I change the --build value in autogen.lastrun?
> No; note that "build" means the platform where you are running the
> cross-compilation (in your case SUSE), and "host"
(the exact meaning and use of which is a bit
>unclear; that might well be unneeded cruft in configure.in) is /usr?
What I did was I manually changing the autogen.lastrun as the previous mail
shown,
then running ./autogen.sh will give me such a log.
Thanks again!
Best wishes,
Yifan
>
Hi Tor,
Many thanks for your quick reply! Yes, I suspect I made some mistakes when
configuring stuff :( While I am still reading, the document I used for autogen
is:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/README.cross#n357
My autogen.lastrun (now I know the first two lines can be i
Hi Thorsten and Jeffrey,
I think the patch is for:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32719
while Rainer's comment#3 is in the bug which was more related with bug (Jeffrey
discovered it when trying to fix 32719):
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39705
So the two
To whom may concern,
The links here looks a bit strange with 'Beta' while we have been in RC phase
for some while:
http://www.documentfoundation.org/download/
The word seems embedded in the picture...(from css)
background:
url(/img/controls/ControlElement_Button_Download_Orange_Li
Hi Petr,
The blocker criteria would be quite useful ;-) Thank you!
For the process to nominate a blocker, is there a specific reason to report a
nomination
twice (1 in mailing list, 2 in bugzilla)?
10 matches
Mail list logo
