Sorry, I noticed a mistake in my last patch. Here is the amended version.
Michael
On 02.02.2011 19:23, Michael Koch wrote:
On 28.01.2011 22:53, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi Michael, *,
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Michael
Meeks wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:29 +0100, Christian
ward
compatibility I will link the out-dated parameters to the new --verbose
param.
Thanks,
Michael
>From cdaf7eb4ae71ca46320caf738e0cd634499bceee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Koch
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:53:37 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Added --verbose param
"--ve
On 30.01.2011 22:51, Guillaume wrote:
Can someone explain me why my patch has not been pushed ?
If I were wrong somewhere, I don't want to make the same mistake twice.
It was my first (really easy/small) patch, to learn how to procede fine.
__
Hi all
I analyzed the build.pl script to get rid of the "--server"
parameter. While looking through the code I discovered two other
parameters "--html" and "--interactive". Both generate a html page
that should show an updated progress of the build. When a
Hi,
The script recursively searches directories for consecutive "empty
line(s) - code line" groups. (discussed with mmeeks)
Licensed under MPL / LGPLv3+
>From 14c3429a8882ecf74f0832fcca02921753984e49 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
s there are over 100 "suspicious" files in
"filters", I will finish it later.
Should my script get pushed, too, for others to use it? And if
yes, where should I place it?
Licensed under LGPLv3+ / MPL
>From fdb91ef4d14af53f0643ce9680f9df9dd8926c54
