have a long list of happy clients and we would love to have you as
our next client.
Warm Regards,
John Smith
Business Development Executive
Global Offices: Perth| San Francisco | Los Angeles | India
*
Don't want to receive these emails in the future? reply to this email
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Keith Curtis wrote:
>
> I don't think it is worth abandoning just because it is in separate languages.
>
Maybe. However, I did run into something else that is worth abandoning it for.
Im have been using the pseudonym of 'John Smith, lbalba...@g
Hi,
All of mine past & future contributions to LibreOffice may be
licensed under the MPLv2/LGPLv3+ dual license.
Regards,
John Smith
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/list
n either perl or python in
its entirety is beyond my current skill set; so if that would turn out
to be a requirement then im afraid i have to abandon the easyhack bug
and let others step in.
We may want to continue this discuss this point on list or in the
gerrit review though; its a valid point.
ls'
run it:
cd dev-tools/fuzz-xml-files/
./fuzz-xml-files.sh
its got some command line switches but the defaults should 'just work'
as long as the vars in the conf file point to sensible stuff.
Eagerly awaiting feedback,
John Smith
__
Perhaps, in an ideal world, it is user configurable (the user gets to
choose) whether, in case of conflict, system default key-assignments
can be overridden by custom user assignments or not. ?
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Rachit Gupta wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm working on fdo#49091
> (
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Markus Mohrhard
wrote:
>
> On Apr 16, 2014 9:35 AM, "John Smith" wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:30 AM, John Smith wrote:
>> >
>> > For odftoolkit, I can run 'mvn install' in the top level source
&g
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:30 AM, John Smith wrote:
>
> For odftoolkit, I can run 'mvn install' in the top level source
> directory, which gets me
> './odfdom/target/odfdom-java-0.8.9-incubating.jar'. Same question:
> just copy the jar to another directory
all' in the top level source
directory, which gets me
'./odfdom/target/odfdom-java-0.8.9-incubating.jar'. Same question:
just copy the jar to another directory and run it with java -jar
foo.jar ?
Thanks,
Regards,
John Smith
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Markus Mohrha
ildslave/source/bin/officeotron.jar
Is there a repository i can check out to get a copy of those files ?
Are there any other dependencies for 'test-bugzilla-files.py' ?
Thanks,
Regards,
John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@l
py $dir
done
or :
find ./libreofficedocs/ -type d | while read dir
do test-bugzilla-files.py $dir
done
Thanks for the help,
Regards,
John Smith
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
y' created this
directory structure, I assumed that test-bugzilla-files.py would be
able to parse that.
I know next time nothing about python, but would it be possible and
reasonably easy/quick to make test-bugzilla-files.py look in all
subdirectory's you point it at too ?
Thanks for all the
ce/instdir/program/soffice
--userdir=file:///tmp/.config/libreoffice/4
/usr/local/src/libreofficedocs/
12128
OfficeConnection: connecting to:
uno:pipe,name=pytest548aca44-c4b8-11e3-83c3-000c29d3;urp;StarOffice.ComponentContext
NoConnectException: sleeping...
kill
kill 12128
Regards,
local/src/libreoffice/instdir/sdk/examples/python
/usr/local/src/libreoffice/odk/examples/python
/usr/local/src/libreoffice/sw/qa/python
/usr/local/src/libreoffice/scripting/examples/python
/usr/local/src/libreoffice/scp2/source/python
/usr/local/src/libreoffice/unotest/source/python
Regar
et,port=8100 /usr/local/src/libreofficedocs/
'dev-tools/test-bugzilla-files.py' basically does the same thing as
what i do on the command line. If anyone has an idea of what could be
going wrong, or where to start troubleshooting, any an
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:42 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 07:31:23AM +0200, John Smith wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Mat M wrote:
>> >
>> > .vsdx (Visio XML format) could be a solution. There are some links with
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:31 AM, John Smith wrote:
>
> Unfortunately I ran into this issue [1] when saving vsd as svg in
> Visio, and then opening it in Draw. Not sure if it's a bug in Visio or
> in Draw, though.
>
Ooops. I mean, opening VSD in LibreOffice, exporting it as SVG
n import svg as well. If earlier versions can as
well, it could be a workaround.
Unfortunately I ran into this issue [1] when saving vsd as svg in
Visio, and then opening it in Draw. Not sure if it's a bug in Visio or
in Draw, though.
Regards,
John Smith.
[1: https://bugs.freedesk
Hi,
I know LibreOffice can open/read Visio .vsd files, but are there any
plans to add exporting/saving to visio .vsd format ? LibreOffice seems
to be unable to do that at this point (4.2.2.1)
Thanks,
Regards,
John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing
eck_targets. Fixed now.
>
> D.
>
Thanks. Happily building build-nocheck now.
Regards,
John Smith
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Thanks very much. Ive updated the lcov wiki page.
- John Smith
-Original Message-
From: David Tardon [mailto:dtar...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 7:55 AM
To: John Smith
Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: lcov report: which directory's to filte
Hi,
Just for clarification: Are we talking about an ill-formed or
corrupted document here, and the way such documents should be handled
?
Regards,
John Smith.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is our policy about MS Word import? Should it
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:20 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The old build system looks for ENVLINKFLAGS variable. So if you set
> ENVLINKFLAGS to the same value as LDFLAGS, the build should pass.
>
> D.
>
Thanks, that works great. Added it to the lcov wiki page.
data for this report (including it
takes longer, and the default is 'off'), as I wasnt sure about the
interest in it.
Regards,
John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:41 AM, John Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Stephan Bergmann
> wrote:
>>
>> Looking into Makefile.top, it might work to do
>>
>> GMAKE_OPTIONS=-rsk make check
>>
> Thanks.
>
> Adding 'k' to GMAK
hen the first check
fails.
;)
Thanks again,
John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> make -k check works here. See e.g.
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=armhf&ver=1%3A3.6.4-1&stamp=1355234789
> (than again I have a patch to not run *any* check-related things
> during "normal" make bu
Is there a way to list all the make test targets or
something, so I can loop over those in a shell script ? (I dont know
much about Makefiles.)
Other ideas are welcome too.
;)
Regards.
John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOff
ng up now again...
- John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Noel Grandin wrote:
>
> On 2012-12-13 19:28, John Smith wrote:
>>
>> Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
>
> That looks like you have valgrind enabled, and I don't think all of our unit
> tests have been ma
Havent got a clue, but
- Did you receive this reply ?
- Is the reply email showing up when you use your browser to access
your email instead of using Thunderbird ?
- Is the reply in the Thunderbird or web Gmail SPAM box
just my 2$, sorry i cant be of more help here.
- John Smith.
On Thu
Well, I re-tried 'make build ; make check' with './configure
--disable-online-update'.
But I run into the the following :
(Maybe I should leave this alone for now ...)
[build CUT] sw_subsequent_ooxmlimport
ods Test
xls Test
xlsx Test
csv Test
==5755== Conditional jump or move depends on uninit
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 12/12/2012 06:36 PM, John Smith wrote:
>>
>> Im trying to run 'make check' at toplevel on ~master. It fails for me
>> at this point (soffice.bin crashes) :
>>
>> make
>> /usr/loc
Hi,
Im trying to run 'make check' at toplevel on ~master. It fails for me
at this point (soffice.bin crashes) :
make
/usr/local/src/libreoffice/workdir/unxlngi6.pro/JunitTest/comphelper_complex/done
Is that 'supposed to work', or should I expect failure(
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
>
> but apparently LDFLAGS don't
>
> hmmm... you could try editing these and adding your options there:
>
> solenv/inc/unxgcc.mk:LINKFLAGSSHLGUI= -shared
> solenv/inc/unxgcc.mk:LINKFLAGSSHLCUI= -shared
>
This works, by the way, for setup_nativ
rious hand holding for that. I can add a bit about dmake not
supporting LDFLAGS this way (and that the new gbuild system does) to
the wiki page describing how to generate the lcov reports.
Thanks,
John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Libr
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Michael Stahl wrote:
>
> setup_native still uses the old dmake based build system, most likely
> that does not support those *FLAGS variables. you can check with "make
> setup_native VERBOSE=t" if that stuff is actually used.
>
Thanks. But I have no idea what to
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 21:50 +0100, John Smith wrote:
>> But I still get this error message (in 'make setup_native')
>>
>> undefined reference to `__gcov_init'
>>
>> Does anyone have a
sage (in 'make setup_native')
undefined reference to `__gcov_init'
Does anyone have an idea of what might be going on here ?
Regards,
John Smith
The output from make is :
# LDFLAGS+='-fprofile-arcs' CFLAGS+='-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage'
CXXFLAGS+='
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> And the above downloaded piece won't helpyou at all if you use
> --with-system-orcus (which you obviously do otherwise it wouldn't check
> for it) as in that case you obviously need a orcus (and a liborcus-0.4.pc)
> _already_ on your
ents (liborcus-0.4 >= 0.3.0) were not met:
No package 'liborcus-0.4' found
- John Smith
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi,
I see a LibreOffice build has a pre-req for 'liborcus-0.4'. However,
my Fedora system has no packages for that. Does anyone know what the
website of that is, so I can download and install the sources ? I
tried a quick google, but couldnt find it.
Thanks.
Regards,
Hi,
So now that people know how to generate these reports, lets hope they
are going to be put to good use !
;)
- John Smith.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 04:41:48PM +0100, John Smith
> wrote:
>> The clang
Hi,
The clang analyzer how-to is here :
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Clang
Regards,
John Smith.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:08 AM, John Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> For the lcov reports, I put the following in the wiki:
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/D
Hi,
For the lcov reports, I put the following in the wiki:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Lcov
Feel free to try it out and edit it as you see fit.
Regards,
John Smith.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 04:15:45PM +0100, J
> Miklos Vajna vmiklos at suse.cz
>
>
Hi John,
>
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 02:45:22AM +0100, John Smith
> wrote:
> > Here's a clang static source code analysis of the latest git sources :
> >
> > http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/clang_reports/master~
Hi,
Here's a clang static source code analysis of the latest git sources :
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/clang_reports/master~2012-11-04_17.27.13/
Regards,
John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Riccardo Magliocchetti
wrote:
> Does anyone can give it a try with a build without --enable-headless please?
Urm. Do *what* exactly, without --enable-headless ?
- John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOff
>
Well, like I said: I guess it all depends on who your target audience
is. Just keep in mind who that is, and what their expected skill set
is, and adjust your procedures to that. IMHO.
- John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.fre
inaries and backtrace them
on their platform ?
Just my 2$
- John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
>
>
> Sounds good, but I agree with John that better instructions are needed. I'm
> working on a new triage page and hopefully in there we can get someone to
> contribute incredibly precise, easy for noobs, instructions for every type
> of backtra
, a 'howto' on how to do this
(on linux, with gdb, on windows, with windbg ?) would be nice to have
?
- John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
uired on his/her own system, then ?
Just my 2$.
- John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
eproduce the issue
that doesnt require the installation of Lotus Domino ?
- John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
n opened and saved in Msoffice or
OpenOffice, and then try to open that saved doc in LibreOffice ? Does
the issue still appear ? Also, would it be helpful to attach such a
document to the bug report for troubleshooting purposes ?
- John Smith.
___
Libr
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 13:15 +0200, John Smith wrote:
>> Alright, let me see if I understand this one correctly first. You
>> basically want people to be able to find out what gets "#define" 'd in
>> w
ar easier to
modify such logic to work on those *.?rc files than to start from
scratch completely ?
- John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
ou call that one an 'EasyHack' ? Surely there must be some
software out there already that enables you to efficiently
search/browse a codebase and/or API / etc ? For example, doesnt
'doxygen' do what you want here ?
- John Smith
__
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Noel Grandin wrote:
> How about producing some patches to fix issues you found?
>
I wish I could. Im just a unix sys admin, and not a developer. Writing
shell scripts is no problem, but I doubt ill be coding C++ anytime
soon.
:(
Regards,
John
Hi,
I was wondering, now that there are initial reports for both code
coverage and statistic analysis, what the next step could be ? For
example, are people interested in mini-HOWTO's on how to (re-)produce
the reports ? Something else entirely ?
Regards,
John
Hi.
So now that we have a coverage report, does that mean that this
bug/issue can be closed ?
Regards,
John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
the tests only
get executed if 'make check' is run ?
Just my 2$
Regards,
John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Well,
I commented out 'sc.ScAccessiblePageHeaderArea' from
'sc/qa/unoapi/sc.sce', but then the following error occurs:
Regards,
John Smith.
LOG> Log starte
n of
'lcov', and the process really takes to long to do it in two passes
just for those 2 files.
Anyway, the report is located here:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/lcov_reports/
Regards,
John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOff
s are easier get caught
> ;-)
>
In the ideal world, yes, of course.
;)
> In addition, it would be also good, to have two reports: (1) with only
> the unit test coverage and (2) one where all test, including
> integration tests etc., were executed.
Huh ? what ?
Regards,
John Smit
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 08/19/2012 09:14 PM, John Smith wrote:
>>
>> - First you run a plain make in the top level directory to build LO
>> (with analysis stuff enabled).
>> - then you create a 'baseline' with lcov (sort o
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 23/08/12 18:09, John Smith wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I just finished a first full run of lcov. There was one 'make check'
>> failure though, and there were a lot of 'warnings' running l
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:47 AM, B.J. Herbison wrote:
> $ ./autogen.sh --help
Im not sure, but arent you supposed to run './autogen.sh' without that
help flag, like you did there with '--help' ? So that it creates the
configure script for you ?
Just my 2$
(I have to check, sorry, make
build && make check takes ages on my machine) wouldnt it be a better
idea to investigate (if it isnt just me, of course) what is causing
the failure ?
Regards,
John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 23/08/12 18:09, John Smith wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I just finished a first full run of lcov. There was one 'make check'
>> failure though, and there were a lot of 'warnings' running l
#x27; on slightly newer sources, and got
some more failures towards the end (including some core dump, too)
Maybe someone should take a look at the output ?
http://pastebin.ca/2197812
Regards,
John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
n reproduce, of course) I
quickly tried a 'make
/usr/local/src/libreoffice/workdir/unxlngi6.pro/JunitTest/sc_unoapi/user'
as suggested in the logfile and that just gave me a 'nothing to do for
foo' response. Can I do a '
should show up
as covered in the report. Maybe people that are familiar with the
contents of the checks/tests and what code/functionality they cover
can take a look at that ?
Anyway, the generated html report as it currently is can be found here :
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.or
uot;core" or
> "core." into cwd).
>
> Stephan
>
I do have core set to unlimited, but I still got a message that a core
could not be generated, and all the output I got was what I posted
already.
- John Smith.
___
LibreOffi
Hi,
I just ran into this error when running 'make check'. Should I file a
bug report on that ?
Regards,
John Smith
*
Failures that appeared during scenario execution:
sc.ScAccessiblePageHeaderArea
1 of 96 tests failed
Job run took
All,
Not a new report (yet), but the clang analyzer reports have found a
permanent home at this location :
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/clang_reports/
Regards,
John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http
to know it's appreciated; I personally got the
impression that the devs already have more work to do than they have
time for. And certainly not the extra time to examine static analyzer
reports to determine if they are actual bugs or just false positives.
I g
5535_0_findsofficepath.c':
findsofficepath.c:(.text+0x429): undefined reference to `__gcov_init'
/usr/local/src/libreoffice/solver/unxlngi6.pro/lib/findsofficepath.o:(.data.rel+0x10):
undefined reference to `__gcov_merge_add'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 ex
atic src analysis reports as well ?
If so, I guess that would require me to get a account at
users.freedesktop.org ? How should I go about getting that ?
Again, im sorry for the off-topic question; but it just sounds like a
good solution to the 'store html pages
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 09:14:52PM +0200, John Smith wrote:
>> When I run 'make help' I get this :
>>
>>unitcheckrun unit tests
>>slowcheckrun slow unit tests
>&g
)
checkrun unit tests and if in toplevel subsequentcheck
Which gives me the idea that, when run from the top level, 'make
check' also runs 'make subsequentcheck ', and that it would make sense
to also run 'ma
7; enough ? Or should
I (also/instead) run 'make unitcheck' and 'make slowcheck' ? Or any
others ?
Regards,
John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
results to include 3rd party code.
--with-system-hsqldb=no --with-system-saxon=no
I have been told that the internal version of those are special cases
where the internal always are required.
The full report is at :
http://lbalbalba.x90x.net/clang-analyzer/libreoffice-with-clang/
Have fun,
Regar
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 6:30 PM, John Smith wrote:
>
> checking if gij knows its java.home... /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.5
> checking for jawt lib name... configure: error: jni.h could not be
> found. Mismatch between gcc and libgcj or libgcj-devel missing?
>
Hrm. lo
analysis of the
newest sources, and not really the analysis of '5-versions-ago' ? Or
am i missing something here ?
Regards,
john Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
still leave that report on the site (if there is still enough
interest) and update it by running the analyser again (also if there
is still enough interest).
Thanks,
Regards,
John Smith
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
h
fice/dmake'
make[1]: *** [/usr/local/src/libreoffice/workdir/unxlngi6.pro/bootstrap] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/libreoffice'
make: *** [all] Error 2
# ls -l dmake/tests/Make*
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1133 Aug 4 12:26 dmake/tests/Makefile.am
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root
ystem libs, located at
'http://lbalbalba.x90x.net/clang-analyzer/libreoffice-with-system-libs/'.
- John Smith.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:53 PM, John Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
>>
>> It's be helpful to find the core.* of the coredump and get a backtrace
>> from it.
>>
> I was under the impression that I already attached a trace w
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
>
> It's be helpful to find the core.* of the coredump and get a backtrace
> from it.
>
I was under the impression that I already attached a trace with my
first email ? Anyway, here it is again.
Regards,
John Smith
>
> But it looks like I can do "scan-build --use-cc=clang
> --use-c++=clang++ ", im trying that but I still get GCC for
> compilation... Will investigate later, gotta go now.
>
Well now when I do:
scan-build --use-cc=/usr/local/bin/clang --use-c++=/usr/local/bin/clang++ \
-o /tmp/foo ./configure
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 08/07/2012 10:40 AM, John Smith wrote:
>>
>> It's not clang/clang++ that is executed here: it's the
>> ccc-analyzer/c++-analyzer. It sits in front of the compiler you use,
>> which is still G
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
>
> It doesn't make much sense to analyze with Clang but compile with GCC.
>
The idea here is that you can use your existing build setup 'as-is'
without being forced to change your build setup like your compiler,
Makefiles, etc. And still be abl
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 08/06/2012 09:57 AM, John Smith wrote:
>>
>> I submitted a bug report : http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13530
>
>
> Hm, -std=gnu++11 should be disabled for Clang on Fedora 17 (i.e., against
> GCC 4.7 he
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:57 AM, John Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> That smells like "On recent Fedora 17, the included Clang (3.0) is unusable
>> due to clang++ chokes on . However, a home-built Clang 3.1
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:22 AM, John Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> When I try to compile LibreOffice ~master on Linux, I get a build
> failure and a core dump.
>
> I have attached the build_error.log and the stack trace.
>
>
> My configure and make lines were:
>
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>
> In any case, such stuff should be something we can filter out in some way
> (post-processing the data -- is it only available as HTML, or also in some
> other format?), so I wouldn't worry about it too much. Just wanted to note
> it down
ts:256:39:
error: use of undeclared identifier '__float128'
struct __is_floating_point_helper<__float128>
^
1 error generated.
I submitted a bug report : http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13530
John Smith.
___
L
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 08/03/2012 03:42 PM, John Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> - Still lots of "external" stuff, dmake, libxmlsec/unxlngi6.pro,
>>> workdir/unxlngi6.pro/LexTarget, ...
>>>
>> Well, the analyzer si
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 08/03/2012 06:07 PM, John Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/type_traits:256:39:
>> error: use of undeclared identifier '__float128'
>
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
