By default, graphite is only enabled on WINNT and Linux, which is wrong.
The only platform it isn't available on is Mac OS X. The attached patch
reverses the check logic and only disables graphite support on this operating
system.
--
Francois Tigeot
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:03:43AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:43:29AM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > On which platform(s) can't we use graphite ? Mac OS X ?
>
> Yes, AFAICT, that is the only platform where VCL does not has a
> Graphite-enab
hite to no if a
particular platform is not supported.
On which platform(s) can't we use graphite ? Mac OS X ?
Is that all ?
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
reeBSD also has CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID if I'm not mistaken.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 09:03:37PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 12:46:14PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > I'll probably have to create a patch to completely disable starmath unit
> > tests
> > if I don't find the culprit quickly.
> &g
unit tests
if I don't find the culprit quickly.
Would it be possible to add a configure flag to skip the qa tests during
packaging ? They are more a PITA than anything else at this stage.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Lib
ther.
Is it possible to know what SSD model was involved ? I have been using
Intel and Crucial/Micron SSDs to build LibreOffice for years now and have
yet to encounter a single failure.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesk
uctant to add all current Unix operating systems using Xorg to the
elif line. Does someone know what was the intended goal for this check ?
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
k they were badly written
in the first place.
They should have checked for particular features if anything, not operating
system names.
configure.ac contains at least one similar bug; I'll send patches in another
thread.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
ached.
--
Francois Tigeot
>From 9d033067bb7854c19b36bc21cba230eaa3d5815c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Fran=C3=A7ois=20Tigeot?=
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 13:06:11 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] configure: graphite can be used on non-Linux, non-WINNT
platforms
C
nd is fixed by the attached patch.
Single quotes were used around a variable name in configure.ac, leading
it to check for files containing the verbatim variable name instead of
its content.
--
Francois Tigeot
>From 917a37edffc0d382b273e00b0e98683a97c5c72f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:16:06AM -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 11:08 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> >
> >The error I got is:
> >libsclo.so: Undefined symbol "_ZN5boost6system16generic_categoryEv"
>
> I think David Tardon has already fixed this.
ost-1.49 or previous versions
gives perfectly fine binaries.
The platform used was DragonFly/x86_64 but I have no reason to believe
other *nix systems would fare differently.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.
Y_PATH to $(OUTDIR)/lib on the model of
testtools/CustomTarget_bridgetest.mk and ensures CustomTarget_uno_test.mk
succeeds in all cases.
It should be committed to -master and the -3.6 branch if possible.
--
Francois Tigeot
>From a2fee1ba5cc96bdf4a493b16897504e0e789aa07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:56:39PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
>
> If the test causes problems for you, fix it.
I have neither the knowledge nor the time to do it; I've filled bug
report #52558 instead.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice m
Boost::Date_time is in fact perfectly functional and the
configure script reports a non-existing error.
Removing the check is enough to make LibreOffice-3.6 build again (see
attached patch).
--
Francois Tigeot
>From 080bbbc053c415d07c4d4ae74e68effb6898024e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-
Hi,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 09:07:06PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 2012-05-26 12:59:32 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
>
> > The attached patch reduces OUTPATH to two possible values: unx and wnt.
>
> In addition to what others already said regarding cross-
Hey Michael,
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:15:51PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 12:59 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > The attached patch reduces OUTPATH to two possible values: unx and wnt.
> > Since
> > it is potentially intrusive, I prefer to
nx and wnt. Since
it is potentially intrusive, I prefer to show it here for review instead of
committing it directly.
--
Francois Tigeot
>From d726ef2fca9430395010f0e6d34469f34583c78a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Fran=C3=A7ois=20Tigeot?=
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 12:48:42 +0200
Su
All of my past contributions to LibreOffice are licensed under the
MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license; subsequent ones may also be licensed as
MPL/LGPLv3+ unless stated otherwise.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 03:02:45PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> >
> > If boxes are finally set up, they will be DragonFly + pkgsrc packages only,
> > special software will have to be maintained by the developers th
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 09:09:34AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Francois Tigeot
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 04:11:18PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> >>
> >> * tinderboxen / status (Norbert)
&g
ual-boxes (ideally)
I'd like to know a bit more about this item; Norbert, would you prefer real
boxes if possible ?
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
s; that code was related to
floppy handling (stardesktop remains ?) and only fully implemented for
Solaris and maybe Linux.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
, which is never the case.
Since it is never used, we may as well remove it. Patch attached.
I thought it would be best to not remove such an important piece of code
without some discussion first.
--
Francois Tigeot
>From fb6b17a9e8198d6a81367af7aca48757f2ba2bc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?
BSD use the same packaging system; what ever you end up
doing, please do the same thing for both platforms.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
xt/adabas/ANewDb.cxx
> > [ build CXX ] dbaccess/source/ext/adabas/Aservices.cxx
> > [ build CXX ] dbaccess/source/ext/adabas/ASqlNameEdit.cxx
> > [ build DEP ] LNK:Library/libadabasuilo.so
>
> This looks like only the User Interface part of Adabas, and not the
&g
se days ?
Last time I had a look, gcc-3.3 was still the main compiler, with some
ongoing work to replace it with a 4.6.x version.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
needs the internal gethostbyname_r() implementation
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=5f32a5558e8672ed56d5d393228aefacc632846c
Thanks for reviewing them,
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedeskto
ically get it.
> >
> git fetch --tags is your friend here. :)
Ok, thanks all for your answers.
I'll create an alias for git and forget about it :)
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Thanks for your answers Miklos and Christian,
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 02:02:09PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Francois Tigeot
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:49:50PM +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> >> [...]
> >
The pre-release page only lists binaries; would it be possible to add links
to the source code tarballs for people wanting to build LO themselves ?
As far as I know, the tree has not been tagged so the only way to get the
exact same sources used to create theses binaries is to download a compl
thing but if it leads to
lost hours of work, it's definitively _not_ an improvement.
I'm grateful to Bjoern for having re-established the verbose output behavior.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:59:53AM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> The attached patch removes the use of *PDP_ENDIAN* defines; besides the
> two .h files in the patch, nothing uses them.
Pushed.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailin
The attached patch removes the use of *PDP_ENDIAN* defines; besides the
two .h files in the patch, nothing uses them.
Please test it on your platform of choice, I'll commit it when I'll be sure
it doesn't break anything.
--
Francois Tigeot
>From 804a0660bb66f8453f71768e440767
ures (like styles),
Microsoft Word had a mode where the style name for each paragraph was shown
on the left of the document beeing edited.
I always found that handy.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://list
ines 103-107 of endian.h are in a #if defined(FREEBSD) section
After some more digging I found out FREEBSD is defined in the system version
of nspr/prcpucfg.h
I'll try to disable the use of system nspr headers as a workaround.
--
Francois Tigeot
__
should be removed and if it does something useful, that something
should be rewritten to not depend on network resources.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:01:33PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Some FreeBSD only fixes for soenv
Pushed.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:59:47PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Here is a patch to avoid a unit test that fail the same on FreeBSD as on OSX
>
> (Apparently because of aKname don't know more about it yet)
Pushed today.
--
F
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:49:25PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> Here is a patch to remove the unxfbsdi.mk and unxfbsx.mk, using a single
> unxfbsd.mk highly simplified
Thanks for the patch, I've pushed it (apart from the DLLPOSTFIX= line).
--
F
Hi David,
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 06:28:30AM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 09:22:52PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, system python is not always named 'python'. On one of my
> > systems, it is named 'python2.6'
counters
this script...
Configure correctly detects the right python interpreter and puts it in
the PYTHON environment variable but I'm not sure how to exploit it to
correct this issue
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@l
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 04:06:39PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 09:05 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> >
> > The latest -master version crashes reliably on NetBSD (i386 and amd64).
>
> We're sure that its the LibO side that changed right, i.e.
d help files, and the ones described in
the MORE_DISTFILES list
If you run pkgsrc on your systems, the package should at the bare minimum
download the files for you.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
o this frame (corrupt stack?)
(gdb)
Does any UNO specialist have a clue what to look for ?
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:56:50PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Francois Tigeot
> wrote:
> >
> > Still, this ccache stuff is too clever for its own good IMHO.
>
> for reference here is the motivations that lead me to do it
[Snip a
Hi Eike,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 07:42:54PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 17:49:06 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
>
> > > Francois, did you adapt solenv/bin/linkoo as well?
> > Good catch, I didn't.
> >
> > What does this file do ? I did
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:00:54PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Francois Tigeot
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm not happy about this commit either: when packaging LibreOffice under
> >> pkgsrc,
> >> it do
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:58:08AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Francois Tigeot
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Francois Tigeot
> >> wrote:
x27;t_ want to use
it when creating packages on the same machine.
Could this change be reverted ? Instead of improving things, it degrades them.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Francois Tigeot
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:06:57AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Francois Tigeot
> >> wro
before commiting the patch
and there was no obvious problem.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:06:57AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> >
> > The build system uses so many flags and tricks it can't run as-is under
> > the pkgsrc framework, many libraries are not found at link time
two separate source trees and only use about the same
disk space than with a single one.
Git clone uses hard links when the source and clone repositories are on the
same filesystem. That also prevents using twice the space.
For my part, I'm using filesystem deduplication
ot; was the target of the build.
> Sure. That would be a pretty obvious change. It would match the file names
> Env.Host.sh and Env.Build.sh nicely, too.
Ah, neat. I never made the connection before :)
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
> Can't we at least get rid of the '350' subdirectory ?
> Yes please.
I'll give it a try then.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:07:03AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Francois Tigeot
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:17:33AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> >> > I'd like to consolidate the different OUTPATH values to a single
RC}/solver/350/unxnbsd.pro/lib:${X11BASE}/lib
For now, I only do this for DragonFly and NetBSD but this is not ideal and I
will
certainly blow up some limit if I add all the Linux variants...
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOff
existing LibreOffice code in set_soenv.in
The number of possible values has been reduced for some *BSD systems without
any ill-effects.
I'd like to consolidate the different OUTPATH values to a single one or two
at most (unx and wnt).
Thoughts ?
--
Francois T
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:32:50PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
>
> That was just the configure check beeing too zealous. I've fixed it.
Mark as pushed
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedeskt
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 04:58:37PM -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 22:47 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
>
> > > Are we sure that all supported *ixes have CUPS available nowadays?
> >
> > Pretty much. CUPS runs on AIX, the five *BSDs and Linux.
>
Hi Eike,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:50:13PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 2011-08-21 20:53:14 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
>
> > There is still some old (and broken) code to try to print with something
> > else than CUPS on Unix systems.
>
> Are we su
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:20:24PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:29:12AM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:50:43PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 08:53:14PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> >
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:50:43PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 08:53:14PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > -dnl check for cups support
> > -dnl ===
> > -AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether
Hi,
There is still some old (and broken) code to try to print with something
else than CUPS on Unix systems.
As a first step to clean it, this patch enable CUPS unconditionally
--
Francois Tigeot
>From aed4e0988b1734ec6390665e57441ea3e4257bd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Fran
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 10:08:24AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 13:57 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > "These problems were detected only 5 days before the official Java 7
> > release,
> > so Oracle had no time to fix those bugs&q
ree (but disabled) so that if someone who needs it discovers it
isn't there anymore with 3.5, it can be reactivated quickly.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
se problems were detected only 5 days before the official Java 7 release,
so Oracle had no time to fix those bugs"
They knew before the release date their product was broken and they still
shipped it. Unbelievable.
Instead of taking steps to
:
solver/350/unxdfly.pro/workdir/Headers/Library/libcppunit.so
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
ay all ;) If someone has some
> hardware to check a removal do it!
I have already killed the XFree86 checks; I didn't take the time to investigate
the other products/vendors yet.
If you are sure some of them are no longer used these days, fe
The Irix bits have been removed from the tree and last time I saw olwm it was
on a version of Slackware from the 1990s.
Both can be killed IMHO.
Why does LO tinker with window managers in the first place ?
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing li
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:22:45AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 08:13 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> >
> > It seems like OTempFileService, defined and implemented in
> > libs-gui/unotools/source/ucbhelper is unused.
> >
> > There'
dy in the list of unused functions.
Howewer, since it involves UNO, this code may be loaded at runtime by an
obscure corner of the gui I'm not aware of.
Could someone confirm if it can be safely removed (or not) ?
--
Francois Tigeot
diff --git a/unotools/Library_utl.mk b/unotools/Library_ut
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 02:19:26PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 18:48 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> >
> > Caolán, is there a special reason you added the access() checks ?
>
> Yes, so that you don't end up using a tmp dir you're not able
> be a security vulnerability? (TOCTTOU seems to be the technical term,
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time-of-check-to-time-of-use )
I've removed the checks in this new version of the patch
Would that be more acceptable ?
--
Francois Tigeot
diff --git a/sal/osl/unx/tempfile.c b/
> be a security vulnerability? (TOCTTOU seems to be the technical term,
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time-of-check-to-time-of-use )
These were added by Caolán; I've no strong feeling about them.
Caolán, is there a special reason you added the access() c
Patch attached, and discussed with Caolán.
I've detected a bit of duplicate code in different files, I'll try to make
them use this function in the future.
--
Francois Tigeot
>From 0f396782dee612dabea9ee9830f564d7815e464f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francois Tigeot
Date: Wed, 1
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 09:24:25AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 08:20 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > > If nobody gives me a reason not to in the next days, I plan to remove both
> > > the useless #if defined list and the whole XFree
end your platform to the Solaris
* case if your platform has SystemV printing per default.
*/
Trying to manage printers in one way or another depending on the operating
system name feels incredibly wrong for application code.
Shouldn't CUPS be the default printing system anywhere by now on Unix-like
systems ? Is there a reason to keep this sort of code as-is ?
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
>
> I'm a bit puzzled by code using what is almost a complete list of all
> platforms running X11 to define some features:
>
> We also have some code dedicated to finding the origin of different X11
> impl
XFree. Since no one has complained, I suspect the
problems it fixed are not even relevant today. They were bit order issues
on 8-bit displays.
If nobody gives me a reason not to in the next days, I plan to remove both
the useless #if defined list and the whole XFree section.
Hi Michael,
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 09:40:44AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 08:10 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
>
> > #if defined(LINUX) || defined(FREEBSD) || defined(MACOSX) ||
> > defined(NETBSD) || \
> > defined(OPENBSD) || defined(
brain damaged to detect the presence
of the XKB extension but it has been part of X since X11R6.1 which has been
released in March 1996 ...
Would anybody object if I remove the test and consider XKB present on all
X11 systems ?
--
Francois Tigeot
Hi Regina,
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:42:43PM +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Francois Tigeot schrieb:
> [..]
> >There's also the matter of Impress: the Style and Formatting module is
> >completely useless there. New styles can't be created or custom styles
> >
think I tried this fairly recently on 32bit with e.g. a contemporary
> flash plugin and it still worked. For 64bit I had to hack up some totem
> firefox plugin [...]
And is it useful ?
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreO
less there. New styles can't be created or custom styles
applied to the document.
The inability to use style in Impress is a real turn-down but I'm afraid
the problem is bigger than the developer's list.
Is there a process to tackle (re)design issues ?
--
Francois Tigeot
___
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 09:29:27AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 18:12 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > The implementation of open-url.sh has to be fixed but besides changing the
> > program names to more modern equivalents, I've no real idea how i
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:36:44AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 18:07 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > I'm not running MacOS X, but all my LibreOffice builds are done without
> > Java and the only obvious broken feature is the C
Hi Christian,
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 01:22:21PM +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> >
> > The following files seem to be unused:
> >
> > impress/sd/source/filter/eppt/eppt.cxx
> > impress/sd/source
for building on master and back-porting those myself :-)
Master is also reasonably okay for day-to day work; I have been using
snapshots without trouble with small .odt or .ods documents for the last
two month or so...
--
Francois Tigeot
can be safely disabled from all builds (and the saving code fixed if
it really needs it on MacOS X) IMHO.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
r this case).
Some related files in this directory also use OS/2-era low-level functions
and a specific implementation of file open dialogs.
So far I've not been able to find proof they are unused but the suspicion
is high.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
fice/src/
http://download.go-oo.org/src/
http://www.numbertext.org/linux/
The files under go-oo.org and numbertext.org should also be available from
download.documentfoundation.org.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.
wip.sourceforge.net/
http://pkgsrc-wip.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pkgsrc-wip/wip/libreoffice/
A handful of people are downloading the distribution files; almost no
feedback apart from wiz@ so far.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOff
unrelated to the core dialog code.
Does anyone know a bit more about this part of the tree ? I'm afraid it's
another remnant from the MS-DOS and OS/2 era ...
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 08:17:41AM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
>
> The attached patch disables the Adabas D client library in -master (but does
> not remove the driver code itself).
Patch pushed this day.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffic
s@ and various IRC channels;
most of my findings are in this thread:
http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/msg06607.html
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:46:58PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
>
> In light of my recent findings, I have become convinced Adabas D is not used
> and will not be in the future.
>
> We could kill two birds with one stone by simply disabling the build of this
> library.
l not be in the future.
We could kill two birds with one stone by simply disabling the build of this
library.
I have no strong opinion on the code itself; someone suggested we could keep
it as a database driver example.
Thoughts ?
--
Francois Tigeot
1 - 100 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
