Noel, something looks broken with the mail setup. While I personally
received your mail twice (yesterday and today), both times with attached
patch, I only see it on the mailing list once (from today) -- and with
the attachment stripped.
Anyway, I will have a look at it today.
Stephan
On 03
Hi
This is the first commit in the series.
It updates the IDL files in the UDKAPI module.
I'll wait for your OK before continuing.
Regards, Noel Grandin
Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@list
Hi Noel,
On 14.03.2012 17:02, Noel Grandin wrote:
Note that this is not the nicest patch to review because I'm converting
complicated nested loops.
Heh - right, *two weeks* have passed. :(
I have reviewed it - some not-equal-to-null conditions got lost
(ScAddress may be NULL) and
-
Hello,
Let me reply to this a bit more in length.
On 27/03/12 02:45, huqitu du wrote:
> I don't need detect the file format, I only need to know the file
> extension name and if it is .wps(for example abc.wps) when open file
> then lets my DLL function( the function can translate the wps file int
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just seen that LO still bundles an ancient version of openssl.
>
> Directly bundling such libraries is a stupid idea anyways, so I'll
> start cleaning up that mess.
As soon as you get Microsoft to install system openssl li
Hey,
[1] fixes the export bug that more if more than 84 empty but formatted
rows were after the last row containing data, the exporter skipped
those rows.
The patch is safe and should not change the behavior in any other case
but will allow to switch other methods too that might have been
acciden
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Mark Stanton wrote:
> My initial build fails complaining
>
> Processing en-US
> ./../unxlngx6.pro/misc/en-US/shared.tree is illformed xml ( on
> linux)
>
> I've looked at the xml, and the file it is (presumably?) derived from
> in helpcontent2/source/auxiliary and
Hi there,
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=06c16e1e26a0137a0048085cdf1c7758d3ac96cd
fixes a somewhat nasty bug in the vcl alpha vdev blending algo, see
attached bugdoc (and start slideshow) to see the problem.
Big kudos to Muthu for pointing my nose repeatedly at the faulty
I don't need detect the file format, I only need to know the file extension
name and if it is .wps(for example abc.wps) when open file then lets my DLL
function( the function can translate the wps file into LO file format)
handle it, and the function will make a new file named .odt( for example
abc
Hi folks,
I've just seen that LO still bundles an ancient version of openssl.
Directly bundling such libraries is a stupid idea anyways, so I'll
start cleaning up that mess.
Is there any proper place where I should push to ?
cu
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Enrico Weigelt
VNC -
On 26 March 2012 17:31, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> I have fixed sal_rtl_strings, which was a missing explicit dependency
great, I would not come up with dependency on sal_textenc.
> [ build srs ]
> /builds/tinderbox/libo-master/basctl/source/basicide/basicprint.src
> cpp: line 31, Fatal error: Canno
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
--- Comment #255 from Boostland 2012-03-26 16:57:46 PDT
---
Add Bug 39887 - Regression: ODT files no longer display in Explorer preview
Explorer Preview and Icon thumb also broken in 3.5.2rc1
The Icon Thumb appeared to be working again in 3.4.
My initial build fails complaining
Processing en-US
./../unxlngx6.pro/misc/en-US/shared.tree is illformed xml ( on
linux)
I've looked at the xml, and the file it is (presumably?) derived from
in helpcontent2/source/auxiliary and it looks alright to me.
Anyone know why it's failing? Something
All past, present and future contributions by me to the LibreOffice
project are under LGPLv3+/GPLv3+/MPL until further notice.
Cheers,
--
Antón Méixome - TDF member 105
Blog about Galician Office Suite
Galician community OOo.org & LibO
http://blog.openoffice.gl
__
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 06:27:38PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:28:09AM -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > The owner of this easy hack appears to be Bjoern. I'm CC'ing him to get
> > his attention.
> Got it, checking back with original reporter at lp#905355.
Patch loo
On Monday 26 of March 2012, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Regina Henschel
>
> wrote:
> >>> I have tried also with
> >>> --with-windows-sdk-home="/cygdrive/c/Programme/Microsoft
> >>> SDKs/Windows/v6.0A"
> >>
> >> I believe that configure option has been renamed to
> >> --
Hi
I converted the SV PTRARR_DEL to boost::ptr_vector in sw component.
Could you please check and push this path?
This and later contributions is licensed under MPL 1.1 / GPL v3+ / LGPL v3+.
Best Regards
Bartosz
From 0af592927b760e31ed23e4c6bcedc58d29cb4a9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bartosz
Hi Enrico,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Just curious:
>
> Why an specific file encryption handling in yet another desktop
> application instead of general solutions, like encrypted storage
> or transmission media (eg. filesystem or blockdevice level ?).
Sending over
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Regina Henschel
wrote:
>>> I have tried also with
>>> --with-windows-sdk-home="/cygdrive/c/Programme/Microsoft
>>> SDKs/Windows/v6.0A"
>>
>>
>> I believe that configure option has been renamed to
>> --with-dotnet-framework-home. E.g. I have
>>
>> --with-dotne
Hi,
> We have studied the code base of MySQL extensively. Our next project
> due in SERC is embedding MySQL/SQLite as a default in LibreOffice Base
I hope you don't intend to directly build in mysql (or even worse:
bundle its source code), but instead just provide a proper connector
(maybe with s
Just curious:
Why an specific file encryption handling in yet another desktop
application instead of general solutions, like encrypted storage
or transmission media (eg. filesystem or blockdevice level ?).
cu
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@li
Hi Regina,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Regina Henschel
wrote:
> I have tried also with
> --with-windows-sdk-home="/cygdrive/c/Programme/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v6.0A"
I believe that configure option has been renamed to
--with-dotnet-framework-home. E.g. I have
--with-dotnet-framework-
Hi all,
trying to configure on WinXP in cygwin with MSVC Express 2008
I get the error
checking for Windows SDK... configure: error: Some (all?) Windows SDK
files not found, please check if all needed parts of the Windows SDK
are installed.
I have tried also with
--with-windows-sdk-home="/cy
On Monday 26 of March 2012, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Wildcard on $WORKDIR is wrong because generated files don't need to
> exist when parsing makefile.
>
> With
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-5&id=a
>f67f5f6438bde777c0cbb4d90c7f6bdcd831bf3 this problem
Hi there,
I'd like to have the attached patch applied for the 3-5 and possibly for
the 3-5-2 branch as well.
It fixes
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46942
It's actually a very old regression, as the responsible commit goes back
to May of 2011. But it was only recently discovered
Sadly that does not solve the too many file problem :-(
Norbert
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hello,
Wildcard on $WORKDIR is wrong because generated files don't need to
exist when parsing makefile.
With
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-5&id=af67f5f6438bde777c0cbb4d90c7f6bdcd831bf3
this problem is now visible in i18npool. I fixed it in master as part of
Michael Stahl píše v Pá 23. 03. 2012 v 17:44 +0100:
> because up until a week ago my knowledge of Writer's drawing code was
> precisely zero, it would be a good idea to test this a bit. in case
> something is still wrong i'd strongly consider reverting the original
> commit (0f0896c26fb260d1bbf31
On Monday 26 of March 2012, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > I have reverted the above commit in 3-5, the 3-5 tinderbox page is red
> > enough.
>
> The commit above only implement no_dep correctly.. it does not force
> you to use it.
> if disable-
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
>
> I have reverted the above commit in 3-5, the 3-5 tinderbox page is red
> enough.
The commit above only implement no_dep correctly.. it does not force
you to use it.
if disable-dependcy-tracking is broken then don;t use it in your
autogen.l
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 04:42:39PM +0100, Caolán McNamara
wrote:
> Well, sure, but it only solves 1/2 the problem, it will still crash in
> the second part of the problem :-)
Right, I wonder why Rainer closed the bug...
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Lib
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:28:09AM -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> The owner of this easy hack appears to be Bjoern. I'm CC'ing him to get
> his attention.
Got it, checking back with original reporter at lp#905355.
Best,
Bjoern
___
LibreOffice mailing l
Hi,
On 26/03/12 15:38, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 09:08 +, Andrew Higginson wrote:
>> Strangely, underneath this MultiLineEdit, there is now the same text as
>> in the MultiLineEdit - like some 'ghost' text (you can see this here
>> http://i.imgur.com/oAArn.png)
>
> Can yo
> Pushed proper fix now; reverted previous one.
Thanks;)
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On 03/26/2012 05:06 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 03/26/2012 12:21 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
The following patch seems to help, does it look sane?
Tor, I see you pushed this now, although it is wrong (or at least does
not address the root of the problem, which is that
JNI_compound_type_info ma
On Monday 26 of March 2012, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> Hi Kendy,
>
> On 26 March 2012 09:51, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> > Beautiful, pushed to libreoffice-3-5 too:
> >
> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-5&id
> >=af67f5f6438bde777c0cbb4d90c7f6bdcd831bf3
> >
> > and upda
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 17:07 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 05:37:16PM +0100, Michael Stahl
> wrote:
> > eminently sensible approach, hence pushed to master and libreoffice-3-5.
>
> Looks sane for me as well, +1, if review is needed for -3-5-2.
Well, sure, but it only solve
Kohei Yoshida píše v Po 26. 03. 2012 v 08:57 -0400:
> On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 11:14 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 05:25 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> > > [1] saves us a lot of time initializing the autofilter pop-up by
> >
> > Lovely :-) thanks for that. Squashed into a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
Bug 37361 depends on bug 33393, which changed state.
Bug 33393 Summary: After autosave image shows read-error and will be lost on
save
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33393
What|Old Value |New Value
On Monday 26 of March 2012, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> I would not do that so quickly. gbuild does not seem to be ready for
> --disable-dependency-tracking.
> If you get error in i18npool or something like
> http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/cgi-bin/gunzip.cgi?tree=MASTER&brief-log=1
>332734401.27413#3853
Le 22/02/12 16:55, Michael Meeks a écrit :
Hi all,
> Well - I think it's pretty clear that there are issues with storing
> meta-files, though the only bustage I can see is in having them renamed
> underneath you when saving them as ODF - AFAICS any save as ODF of that
> document, whether au
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Rainer Bielefeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|36742 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
Bug 37361 depends on bug 36742, which changed state.
Bug 36742 Summary: PDF export of minimal width lines
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36742
What|Old Value |New Value
-
Michael Stahl píše v St 21. 03. 2012 v 17:37 +0100:
> > My first thought was a quick hack like the attached to use
> > processSwTableByLayout only if the table has layout information and use
> > the other branch otherwise.
>
> eminently sensible approach, hence pushed to master and libreoffice-3-5
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 11:01 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> First off, it's my understanding that the old container took ownership
> of the contained elements i.e. when the pointer that points to an
> instance is removed from the container it would call delete on that
> pointer to delete the object.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 05:37:16PM +0100, Michael Stahl
wrote:
> eminently sensible approach, hence pushed to master and libreoffice-3-5.
Looks sane for me as well, +1, if review is needed for -3-5-2.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.free
On 03/26/2012 12:21 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
The following patch seems to help, does it look sane?
Tor, I see you pushed this now, although it is wrong (or at least does
not address the root of the problem, which is that
JNI_compound_type_info makes css.uno.RuntimeException's m_base
erroneou
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 23:41 +0100, Bartosz wrote:
> Hi
>
> I converted the SV PTRARR to std::deque in sw component.
> Could you please check and push this path?
> This and later contributions is licensed under MPL 1.1 / GPL v3+ / LGPL v3+.
I'm not a writer guy, and my understanding with these hid
Just looking at the below function itself (so no idea about the larger
context), I noted a few things:
On 03/19/2012 01:17 AM, Andrzej J. R. Hunt wrote:
+void FileDialogHelper_Impl::verifyPath()
+{
+struct stat aFileStat;
+const char* pFullPath = OUStringToOString( ( maPath.copy(7) + ma
Petr Mladek píše v Po 26. 03. 2012 v 15:34 +0200:
> Michael Meeks píše v Po 26. 03. 2012 v 13:10 +0100:
> > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 13:16 +0200, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> > > Between me and Thorsten (more Thorsten then me as usual), we fixed the
> > > fdo#47406. We would love the distinguished readersh
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Rainer Bielefeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|43266 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.
On 03/26/2012 05:23 PM, Abhishek Jindal wrote:
I am highly interested in working with Libre Office this summer.
I have fairly good knowledge of C and C++ and also I am ready to make all
possible effort required in understanding and writing code.
Can I make the grade?
Do I stand a chance?
I am hi
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 09:08 +, Andrew Higginson wrote:
> Strangely, underneath this MultiLineEdit, there is now the same text as
> in the MultiLineEdit - like some 'ghost' text (you can see this here
> http://i.imgur.com/oAArn.png)
Can you attach the code you've got that creates the effect ?
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 18:03 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> On 24.03.2012 03:26, julien2412 wrote:
> > Just for the update, is there anybody who could help about this ?
>
> I am not expert, too, but looking at vcl/source/gdi/sallayout.cxx:115
> and http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 00:17 +, Andrzej J. R. Hunt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a my first attempt at a patch, fixing Bug 43895 (Never let users
> save in /tmp by default).
>
> I was debating adding a warning for anyone saving to /tmp, however I
> doubt anyone would do this accidentally except i
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 09:49 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Does anyone from Writer have any comment on this patch? If not, I'll go
> ahead and push this to master.
Pushed to master.
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
___
LibreOffice mailing l
On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 20:43 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> removed some code from oox.
Pushed, looks good. I suspect that this will have a bit of a cascade
effect and a pile more stuff will become available for removal on the
next run.
C.
__
Hi Julien,
On 24.03.2012 03:26, julien2412 wrote:
Just for the update, is there anybody who could help about this ?
I am not expert, too, but looking at vcl/source/gdi/sallayout.cxx:115
and http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/UFF00.pdf I'd say that the
condition should be at least
(nChar >=
On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 18:29 +0200, Santiago Martinez wrote:
> This patch removes unused code as listed in unusedcode.easy
looks good, hopefully nothing is used there under windows, but if it is
we'll know soon enough :-), pushed.
C.
___
LibreOffice mai
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 01:03 +0100, Santiago Martinez wrote:
> This patch removes unused code as listed in unusedcode.easy
great, pushed now, thanks.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 22:07 +0100, Santiago Martinez wrote:
> This patch removes unused code as listed in unusedcode.easy
looks good, pushed now, thanks.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/ma
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 21:42 +0100, Santiago Martinez wrote:
> This patch removes unused code as listed in unusedcode.easy
looks good, pushed now, thanks for that.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedeskto
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 23:18 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> regression from OOo 3.4, CWS undoapi, please apply to libreoffice-3-5:
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=f24153cded54954da7f0d80941707715c78e4627
Pushed to 3-5
C.
___
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 00:07 +0100, Nicolas Christener wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I stumbled over #define WEIT_WECH [...] in
> sw/source/core/inc/frmtool.hxx while translating some German comments
> for Cedric.
>
> I asked on IRC if I should translate this to "FAR_AWAY" and got a go
> there. Attached is
Michael Meeks píše v Po 26. 03. 2012 v 13:10 +0100:
> On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 13:16 +0200, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> > Between me and Thorsten (more Thorsten then me as usual), we fixed the
> > fdo#47406. We would love the distinguished readership to review and
> > cherry-pick for 3.5.2 the following t
Tagging [PUSHED]
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 11:14 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 05:25 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> > [1] saves us a lot of time initializing the autofilter pop-up by
>
> Lovely :-) thanks for that. Squashed into a single commit, and proposed
> for 3-5-2 - another two revie
On 03/26/2012 02:43 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
What is missing from the run-time environment when a UNO exception is
thrown with the above message?
Looks like thrown from configmgr code when no .xcs/.xcu data is
available for that path.
Stephan
___
L
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 13:12 +0200, khagaroth wrote:
> LO can open WPS (Woks) files just fine. Don't know if it handles
> Chines glyphs in WPS, but the English and Czech files I tried opened
> and displayed correctly.
Sure - so see the 'libwps' module with the parser for that.
> > On Mon,
On 03/26/2012 02:21 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
So you'd be OK with, say, about 3 or 4 large commits that only touch the
IDL files and the types.rdb file?
And then I can chew on the call-sites piecemeal.
Yes, sure.
Stephan
___
LibreOffice mailing list
L
What is missing from the run-time environment when a UNO exception is
thrown with the above message?
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
So you'd be OK with, say, about 3 or 4 large commits that only touch the
IDL files and the types.rdb file?
And then I can chew on the call-sites piecemeal.
On 2012-03-26 14:10, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
constructors when the service IDL is changed, in which case can I do the
IDL files conversion
I am pushing that for 3.5.2 myself now
Cheers
Fridrich
On 26/03/12 12:29, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 10:13 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
>>> Thorsten has corrected the handling of z in svg paths. This affects
>>> the arrowheads in the standard.soe palette too. Here is patc
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 13:16 +0200, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> Between me and Thorsten (more Thorsten then me as usual), we fixed the
> fdo#47406. We would love the distinguished readership to review and
> cherry-pick for 3.5.2 the following two commits:
Worth not breaking existing documents
On 03/26/2012 01:46 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
By my count, there are approx ~200 IDL files that need to be modified
(list attached).
Is it possible that rather than modifying all of these IDL files, we could
modify the IDLC compiler to look for this pattern and emit new-style
Foo::create construct
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 18:58 +0100, Catalin Iacob wrote:
> > So pushed this now.
> Thanks
Making thread pushed - nice catch :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 03:32 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> That was solved on IRC: the problem was a NTFS back-end fs that was
> messing with the +x flags so ./configure was not executable (nor was
> anything else that should have been)
Oh - nasty :-) and hard to check for that in confi
Hi Riccardo,
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 17:59 +0100, Riccardo Bernardini wrote:
> sorry for the long silence. I wanted to write a thoughtful reply and
> finally I got a timeslot long enough (I am doing an 8-hours train
> trip. That should be plenty).
Nice ! :-) so - in the meantime there is
Hi Vivek,
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 23:28 +0530, vivek nalla wrote:
> I am vivek nalla , first year undergraduate student from bits
> pilani institution india. Since i am a fresher out of school, i didn't
> get a chance to contribute to opensource.
Great to meet you.
> I am very much
Hello, good people,
Between me and Thorsten (more Thorsten then me as usual), we fixed the
fdo#47406. We would love the distinguished readership to review and
cherry-pick for 3.5.2 the following two commits:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-5&id=db3597cef07a0f6
LO can open WPS (Woks) files just fine. Don't know if it handles
Chines glyphs in WPS, but the English and Czech files I tried opened
and displayed correctly.
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 03:17:19PM +0800, huqitu du wrote:
> The DLL function is when LO open a .wps file(this file format is very
> com
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 11:56 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
> I note that some of the C++ unit tests are being run from JUnit, which
> seems counter-intuitive.
:-)
> Is there is a good reason for this, or would it simplify matters to
> convert them to CppUnit?
Everything we convert
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 10:13 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > Thorsten has corrected the handling of z in svg paths. This affects
> > the arrowheads in the standard.soe palette too. Here is patch to
> > adapt the m commands in the arrowheads to the new handling.
>
> Thanks Regina, pushed to mas
The following patch seems to help, does it look sane?
--tml
diff --git a/bridges/source/jni_uno/jni_data.cxx
b/bridges/source/jni_uno/jni_data.cxx
index 9d77812..cabca76 100644
--- a/bridges/source/jni_uno/jni_data.cxx
+++ b/bridges/source/jni_uno/jni_data.cxx
@@ -1968,7 +1968,26 @@ void Bridge::
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 05:25 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> [1] saves us a lot of time initializing the autofilter pop-up by
Lovely :-) thanks for that. Squashed into a single commit, and proposed
for 3-5-2 - another two reviews needed... - trivial patch etc.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/l
Hi
I note that some of the C++ unit tests are being run from JUnit, which
seems counter-intuitive.
Is there is a good reason for this, or would it simplify matters to
convert them to CppUnit?
Regards, Noel Grandin
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Libr
Caolán McNamara píše v Pá 23. 03. 2012 v 16:45 +:
> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 14:40 +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems to me that
> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/dictionaries/commit/?id=6299bf66e3004cb8db805b360070762d0870cf50
> > solves fdo#47736. Please cherry pick t
Hi
I'm getting this build error during "make check" while building on
64-bit Ubuntu Linux from master.
[ build JCS ] JunitTest/sot_complex
terminate called after throwing an instance of
'CppUnit::DynamicLibraryManagerException'
what(): Symbol [cppunitTestPlugIn] not found in dynamic
libar
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:44 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 20/03/12 12:19, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 23:29 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> >> this fix introduces a new array to store the borders and paints them
> >> after the subsidiary lines are done, effective
Hi,
please note that the commit deadline for 3.5.2-rc2 is today, March 26,
2012. It will be used as LO-3.5.2 final if no blocker is reported.
See also
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.5_release
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/
Hi Jordan,
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 14:06 -0700, Jordan Chin wrote:
> I began investigating this bug:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35862
Lovely ! :-)
> The bug is that the "Increase Font"/"Decrease Font" button should be
> useable when one selects text of multiple sizes
Michael Meeks píše v So 24. 03. 2012 v 14:23 +:
> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 22:25 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 13:37 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> > > Here is a message that I have just sent to ooo-dev about the silent
> > > switching to AES256 being an interoperabil
Hi Waqas,
Sorry for the delay...I was away (festival weekend here).
Well,I did reply to your mail earlier today. Do let me know if you need
any other info too (or in case the mail didn't reach you)...
Regards,
Muthu Subramanian
On 03/25/2012 02:22 PM, Waqas Iftikhar wrote:
> The IRC channel is d
Hi Matus,
On 2012-03-26 at 10:06 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> > and updated the @6-fast and @15-Prague Win32 tinderboxes to use that.
>
> I would not do that so quickly. gbuild does not seem to be ready for
> --disable-dependency-tracking.
> If you get error in i18npool or something like
> http:/
Regina Henschel wrote:
> Thorsten has corrected the handling of z in svg paths. This affects
> the arrowheads in the standard.soe palette too. Here is patch to
> adapt the m commands in the arrowheads to the new handling.
>
Thanks Regina, pushed to master - we need more reviews for -3-5 and
3-5-2
Hi Kendy,
On 26 March 2012 09:51, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Beautiful, pushed to libreoffice-3-5 too:
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-5&id=af67f5f6438bde777c0cbb4d90c7f6bdcd831bf3
>
> and updated the @6-fast and @15-Prague Win32 tinderboxes to use that.
I w
Hi Michael, Lubos,
On 2012-03-24 at 00:17 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> >> Is this the same like should be with --disable-dependency-tracking, except
> >> that it seems it does not with gbuild?
> >
> > To actually provide a patch, is this correct?
>
> looks good to me, and better than some we
On 03/23/2012 08:50 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
pushed to libreoffice-3-5
marked as such
Stephan
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 03:17:19PM +0800, huqitu du wrote:
> The DLL function is when LO open a .wps file(this file format is very
> common in china and not supported in LO yet), the DLL convert the .wps file
> into .odt format and open it.
So if you already have a parser for it, why don't you ad
Hello Waqas,
On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 13:52 +0500, Waqas Iftikhar wrote:
> The IRC channel is dead
> Mr. Mutthu the mentor of this project is not replying from his
> official email. The IRC channel is dead also.
Just give him a bit more than a week-end to answer... as quite a lot of
paid hackers on
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
