Re: [Libreoffice] OOo issue 101224. could it be a LibO easy hack?

On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:21:02 +0100, julien2412 wrote: Hi Tommy, I'm not an expert but like you, I dislike duplication. Now what do you do with words like : "colour", "humour", etc. that you write in English whereas you would write "color", "humor", etc in US ? Of course, it's perhaps just n

Re: [Libreoffice] bug 36874 (label printing) further improvement?

>So if Winfried prefers to document choices in the bug to feel safe, I dont >think that is objectable (without that being a hard requirement, of course). Thank you for all your advice. I have created bug 44516 and will document the process there. I leave to you wise men to adjust all the sensitive

[Libreoffice] limiting maximum sheet number to 10000 in 32 bit builds

Hey, I'm sorry but I have to correct one of our features from the release note page. After some discussion I need to limit the maximum amount of sheets in 32 bit builds to 1 sheets. That should still be much more than most people will ever need but we had some adventurous users who tried to cr

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Problem with data -> form dialog in Calc

Hi, A user refereed me to a translation problem in Calc's data -> form dialog, which has "Last Record" above "Next Record", which should probably be "Previous Record". The button indeed behaved as "Previous Record". Also, there's a small bug, as the button is only enabled when getting to the end

Re: [Libreoffice] bug 36874 (label printing) further improvement?

On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 05:40:06PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > The less admin overhead you have to suffer as you cleanup the better > IMHO. Having seen a bit of this "tar-baby", I can understand Winfrieds desire to have the discussion "tracable". This topic contains some nasty cornercases

Re: [Libreoffice] OOo issue 101224. could it be a LibO easy hack?

Hi Tommy, I'm not an expert but like you, I dislike duplication. Now what do you do with words like : "colour", "humour", etc. that you write in English whereas you would write "color", "humor", etc in US ? Of course, it's perhaps just nitpicking since these words are just some cases. Julien. -

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

+1 from me as well. I've been looking for something big to dog lately :) August Sodora aug...@gmail.com (201) 280-8138 On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote: > Hi all, > > >>> Well, should be pretty easy to create a pre_uninstall event that kills >>> the process before it

Re: [Libreoffice] Problem building the 3.5 branch on Windows, postgresql related.

Hi Kohei, On 2012-01-05 at 12:09 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Well, I thought using --with-distro=LibreOfficeWin32 was the > recommended way to build on Windows? Perhaps things are different > now... :-/ I don't think there is an 'official' advice anywhere, but my understanding is that LibreOf

Re: [Libreoffice] About enabling Icedove addressbook connection for Base

I found that the main thing to change was in connectivity/source/drivers/mozab/bootstrap/MNSFolders.cxx. But by running some tests, it seems that the root directory is ~/.config instead of ~/ Precisely, I put a fourth element to have DefaultProductDir[3][4] instead of DefaultProductDir[3][3] then

[Libreoffice] OOo issue 101224. could it be a LibO easy hack?

Hi Guys, my name is TOmmy and I'm an italian LibO user. in April 2009 I opened an issue on OOo bug-tracker: Bug 101224 - common autocorrect replacement table for certain languages subgroups (i.e. en-US, en-GB) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=101224 I'm posting below the descript

[Libreoffice] request to cherry pick fix for fdo44172

Hello all, I recently fixed a pretty embarrassing regression in basic and I'm pretty sure it should cherry picked to the relevant branches. The commit is here: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=25e84ee95954a28d9a6a1b346e6673a9a6de71cc August Sodora aug...@gmail.com (201) 28

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Re: minor idl fixes

Hi Michael, Michael Stahl writes: > thanks for these patches, i've pushed > 0001-fix-broken-ifndef-define-guard-in-idl.patch, > 0002-fix-package-in-idl.patch, 0005-chmod-x-on-java-files.patch. great! > 0003-idl-fix-package-names.patch seems to be wrong, as discussed in the > other mail (and i'v

Re: [Libreoffice] minor idl fixes

Hi Michael, Michael Meeks writes: > Thanks ! - I pushed it to master; it also seems to be in the 3.5 > branch, so hopefully it should be there too for you in the release :-) Thank you! Tomas ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedes

Re: [Libreoffice] minor idl fixes

Hi Stephan, Stephan Bergmann writes: > On 01/05/2012 09:38 AM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: >> Stephan Bergmann writes: >>> On 01/04/2012 11:09 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: >>> diff --git a/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl > > What exactly is broken? as Michael Stahl noticed and fixed, the

Re: [Libreoffice] Doxygen for C/C++ URE Documentation

On 01/04/2012 03:30 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: If there are no objections, I will commit this to master later this week. Done, "Switch from autodoc to doxygen for SDK C++ documentation." Addit

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Online update service up & running

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Kendy I think the scheme you listed will be OK. But I don't have a server to test in an internal network Regards Olivier Em 04-01-2012 17:52, Jan Holesovsky escreveu: > Hi Olivier, > > On 2012-01-03 at 14:01 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote: > >> A

[Libreoffice] minutes of ESC call ...

* Present: + Norbert, Michael, Andras, Stephan, Tor, David, Rainer, Caolan, Michael S, Petr, Kendy, Thorsten, Kohei, Eike, Christian, Bjoern * Completed Action Items + upgrade the internal cairo to latest stable to fix theme crasher (Fridrich) +

Re: [Libreoffice] bug 36874 (label printing) further improvement?

Hi Winfried, On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 11:23 +0100, Winfried Donkers wrote: > -use this list > for all comments/discussion etc.? > I think it would be good to have the comments together (traceable). I think, at this point - you touched the tar-baby and own the labels topic :-) I'm impressed b

[Libreoffice] New technology generates power from nothing

FREE ENERGY TIMES Free Energy is real, but "powerful people" spend a lot of money covering this up and suppressing new technologies, it is not a theory, it is a reality. I have been looking for free energy technologies for a while now, there are many scams out there, but a few concepts stood out

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote (05-01-12 17:19) On 5 January 2012 16:11, Andras Timar wrote: 2012/1/5 Tor Lillqvist: Quickstart feature is installed by default but it is not run by default. My opinion is that we should just kill the feature (code) completely;) +1 Another +1. Especially sinc

Re: [Libreoffice] Problem building the 3.5 branch on Windows, postgresql related.

Hi Kendy, On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > On 2012-01-05 at 02:28 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > >> I'm having trouble building the latest 3.5 branch on Windows.  First, >> the postgresql module failed to build due to it not finding ldap.h >> from mozilla.  I had mozilla en

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

2012/1/5 Pedro : > > Andras Timar wrote >> >>> I can't guarantee that it is installed by default (I NEVER use the >>> default install option on any software) but it is selected by default >>> when I switch to Custom (and I always un-select it). Under Windows >>> options already selected in Custom s

Re: [Libreoffice] UNO Object Life Cycle question

Le 05/01/2012 18:52, Tomas Hlavaty a écrit : Hi all, I'm implementing and can't make much sense of it. It seems to me that the spec is contradictory: ... unless it considers as bridge

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

Hi, On 5 January 2012 16:11, Andras Timar wrote: > 2012/1/5 Tor Lillqvist : >>> Quickstart feature is installed by default but it is not run by default. >> >> My opinion is that we should just kill the feature (code) completely;) >> > +1 Another +1. Especially since most modern OS's do the same

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

Andras Timar wrote > >> I can't guarantee that it is installed by default (I NEVER use the >> default install option on any software) but it is selected by default >> when I switch to Custom (and I always un-select it). Under Windows >> options already selected in Custom should be the same instal

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [REVIEW 3-5: Late feature] Improvements in the header / footer behavior

Hi Kendy all, On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 14:15 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > I have been playing recently with the great new header / footer > indicators, and there were 2 things that I considered suboptimal from > the UX point of view: > > - Appearing / disappearing of the controls after 1 second >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 1/2][PUSHED] Added missing includes.

On Tuesday 03 of January 2012, Marcel Metz wrote: > --- > binfilter/inc/bf_starmath/smmod.hxx |2 ++ > binfilter/inc/bf_sw/shellres.hxx|2 +- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Pushed all patches. -- Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 1/5][PUSHED] Removed unnecessary tools includes.

On Tuesday 03 of January 2012, Marcel Metz wrote: > Hello lo-devs, > > this patch series removes a lot of unnecessary includes for the various > tools header. The patches without suffix should be applied to the core > repository, the .binfilter.patch suffix should be applied to the > binfilter repo

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [REVIEW][3-5] sequence of unfortunate writer ole object in headers problems

On 05/01/12 10:45, Caolán McNamara wrote: > So https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43867 is a most annoying > bug with a crash on mailmerging documents that contain ole objects in > headers. I'd like to get the following into 3-5. > > Immediate crash is fixed by > http://cgit.freedesktop.

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

2012/1/5 Tor Lillqvist : >> Quickstart feature is installed by default but it is not run by default. > > My opinion is that we should just kill the feature (code) completely;) > +1 Andras ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org htt

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

> Quickstart feature is installed by default but it is not run by default. My opinion is that we should just kill the feature (code) completely;) --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/l

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

2012/1/5 Pedro Lino : > Hi Tor, all > >> and it's Pedro even! > > I'm almost sure this wasn't a compliment... Still I'm glad that I'm > not the only one who has this opinion :) > > I can't guarantee that it is installed by default (I NEVER use the > default install option on any software) but it is

[Libreoffice] UNO Object Life Cycle question

Hi all, I'm implementing and can't make much sense of it. It seems to me that the spec is contradictory: ... unless it considers as bridged in any tuple , where t' is a subtype of t (i

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

Hi Tor, all > and it's Pedro even! I'm almost sure this wasn't a compliment... Still I'm glad that I'm not the only one who has this opinion :) I can't guarantee that it is installed by default (I NEVER use the default install option on any software) but it is selected by default when I switch t

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 16:25 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > IMO this doesn't make any sense: if your PC is low spec you don't _want_ > > this; if your PC is high spec you don't _need_ this > > I can't believe it. Finally somebody who agrees with me on this (and I > am not being ironic), and it's P

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

> IMO this doesn't make any sense: if your PC is low spec you don't _want_ > this; if your PC is high spec you don't _need_ this I can't believe it. Finally somebody who agrees with me on this (and I am not being ironic), and it's Pedro even! This is a good start of the year. --tml _

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Fix for fdo43460 Part XXII getLength() to isEmpty()

On Wednesday 04 of January 2012, Gustavo Pacheco wrote: > Hi! > > Partial fix for Easy Hack FDO43460 (part XXII) for review. > > Part XXII > modules > jvmfwk, l10ntools, lingucomponent Pushed, thanks. -- Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz ___ Lib

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

Michael Meeks-2 wrote > > I was wondering if (just before the string freeze) we could try to > improve this string / message to make it much more verbose and helpful. > Preferably to include some text about the 'system tray' or the > "Tools->Options->Memory->Enable systray quick-starter" it

Re: [Libreoffice] bug 36874 (label printing) further improvement?

Winfried Donkers píše v Čt 05. 01. 2012 v 11:23 +0100: > Of the 1789 label definitions (including cards), 1418 are symmetrical > and of standard paper size (A4, A5 or Letter). The remaining 371 have > either unusual/incorrect dimensions or are not symmetrical. This > encourages me to continue wi

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

In my experience, good uninstallers check if the application is currently running, and refuse to complete the uninstallation process until the user has exited the program. Something like: "A LibreOffice application is still running. Please save and exit before continuing". And then grey out the

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

Hi all, >> Well, should be pretty easy to create a pre_uninstall event that kills >> the process before it is removed. Is there any historical reason for >> not doing it this way? > > That would be rude. Users may have unsaved data, etc. Can't we ask users if they really want to kill the applica

Re: [Libreoffice] merging libraries: problem with multiple definitions

On 4 January 2012 15:26, Michael Meeks wrote: >        So - I think here we just add a 'static' keyword in front of those > (clearly module local) variables. done with http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=5f2355014375adb66dd8e986068abc8429e0ad0d >        Does that make some s

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Re: minor idl fixes

On 04/01/12 23:09, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > Also, I attach a few more patches. thanks for these patches, i've pushed 0001-fix-broken-ifndef-define-guard-in-idl.patch, 0002-fix-package-in-idl.patch, 0005-chmod-x-on-java-files.patch. 0003-idl-fix-package-names.patch seems to be wrong, as discussed in

Re: [Libreoffice] minor idl fixes

On 05/01/12 09:38, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > Hi Stephan, > > Stephan Bergmann writes: > >> On 01/04/2012 11:09 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: >> >>> diff --git a/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl >>> b/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl >>> ... >> >> Are you sure that this is right, us

Re: [Libreoffice] bug 36874 (label printing) further improvement?

Hi, On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:23:44AM +0100, Winfried Donkers wrote: > What is best: > -to use bug 36874 (state resolved fixed) for this thread > -to create a new bug (with reference to 36874) > -use this list > for all comments/discussion etc.? > I think it would be good to have the comments tog

Re: [Libreoffice] minor idl fixes

Hi Tomas, On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 23:09 +0100, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > sorry for inconvenience, I have sent the License statement email to the > mailing list so please feel free to reapply the patch. Thanks ! - I pushed it to master; it also seems to be in the 3.5 branch, so hopefully it sho

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 --- Comment #76 from sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com 2012-01-05 03:47:38 PST --- Please, verify Bug 44492 - in Arabian text blank squares instead of letters it my be regression if confirmed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userpref

Re: [Libreoffice] ooo_custom_images to icon-themes, was: Re: Do we support classic and industrial theme?

Hi, On 4 January 2012 17:39, Michael Meeks wrote: >        Great; so - moving default_images into there and making it 'galaxy' > would be a nice cleanup I guess; then again it may need quite some > tweaking of scripts that hard-code it's path I suppose; particularly > (IIRC) 'rsc' checks to make

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed] [Patch] [Review 3.5 - Late Feature] Importing smartArt from

Marking this pushed: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-5&id=b9977b7a23ba4d9fc739133b6aa199f5d6cdec35 Thank you all. On 01/05/2012 12:37 PM, Muthu Subramanian K wrote: > Thank you so much! > So, I assume we have 3 reviews for this. > I will push this to 3.5 today

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

2012/1/5 Jesús Corrius : >>        I was wondering if (just before the string freeze) we could try to >> improve this string / message to make it much more verbose and helpful. >> Preferably to include some text about the 'system tray' or the >> "Tools->Options->Memory->Enable systray quick-starter

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

2012/1/5 Michael Meeks : > >        Or - was this message shown in error Andras ? perhaps the issue is gone > with your re-work here ... I bet it's gone. The bug occured with Windows 7 and LibreOffice 3.4.4 or earlier. Andras ___ LibreOffice mailing lis

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

>        I was wondering if (just before the string freeze) we could try to > improve this string / message to make it much more verbose and helpful. > Preferably to include some text about the 'system tray' or the > "Tools->Options->Memory->Enable systray quick-starter" item. > >        It would p

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Replace ByteString with rtl::OString

On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 23:06 +0100, Chr. Rossmanith wrote: > I've finished genprnpsp.cxx and had to touch some related files as well > (but didn't finish them yet). After a review and removing some > unnecessary rtl:: prefices I'd like to push this modified patch. Watch out for String::Copy, i.e.

[Libreoffice] Removing LibO on Windows ...

Hi guys, Judging from the amount of private mail our fall-back list: To: i...@documentfoundation.org Subject: Delete Your Program gets on this same topic ;-) [ prolly it is the #1 FAQ we have ], perhaps one every week or so, typically from our more basic user: [snip] Dear Sirs:

Re: [Libreoffice] Updating Italian dictionaries

On 05/01/2012 Andras Timar wrote: Why would you like to pack and distribute files from the legacy folder? Those look useless to end users. Because they allow to see who contributed what and when. They are indeed of little interest for end users (and the contributors' names, just the names, ar

[Libreoffice] [Bug 41883] MinGW port Most Annoying Bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41883 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||44489 --- Comment #11 from Rainer Bie

Re: [Libreoffice] Updating Italian dictionaries

Hi Andrea, 2012/1/3 Andrea Pescetti : > Of course for the next update (not before LibreOffice 3.5) we will have a > dedicated public repository for the Italian dictionary and possibly standard > non-binary patches. I apologize for the slightly larger work committers will > need this time. > Why w

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Petr Mladek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||44147 --- Comment #75 from Petr Mladek 20

Re: [Libreoffice] bug 36874 (label printing) further improvement?

>>some labels paper that I bought last year were not symmetric >I found that too when I started to extend the label defintions (1700+ ...) in >labels.xcu with paper height and paper width. >And also that by rounding off the calculated paper size can differ +/- 2mm >from the actual size, espe

Re: [Libreoffice] Problem building the 3.5 branch on Windows, postgresql related.

Hi Kohei, On 2012-01-05 at 02:28 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > I'm having trouble building the latest 3.5 branch on Windows. First, > the postgresql module failed to build due to it not finding ldap.h > from mozilla. I had mozilla entirely disabled (I always had). So I > decided to enable it t

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW][3-5] sequence of unfortunate writer ole object in headers problems

+1 from me too. BTW, I discovered some problems with ole objects in draw documents when importing ole objects included in Visio files. I would not mind to have a quick brainstorming when I am back from holiday. The next libvisio will output those objects and projects linking with system libvis

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW][3-5] sequence of unfortunate writer ole object in headers problems

+1 --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW][3-5] sequence of unfortunate writer ole object in headers problems

So https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43867 is a most annoying bug with a crash on mailmerging documents that contain ole objects in headers. I'd like to get the following into 3-5. Immediate crash is fixed by http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=7dc25878c1310a1de6d3c8

Re: [Libreoffice] Old Oracle Mysql Connector no longer works with 3.5 on Windows - looking for a regular build solution ?

On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 18:33 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > There was a bug report here : > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44075 Great thanks - lets continue this thread in the bug; I've added Jesus' helpful pointer there too. Thanks, Michael. -

[Libreoffice] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.4.5 RC2 test builds available

Hi *, for 3.4.5 RC2, we're now uploading builds to a public (but non-mirrored - so don't spread news too widely!) place, as soon as they're available. Grab them here: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/ If you've a bit of time, please give them a try & report *critical* bugs not yet

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||44467 Bug 37361 depends on bug 43867,

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 43867, which changed state. Bug 43867 Summary: MAILMERGE: Mail Merge with ole object in header of document, causes crash. SfxObjectShell::GetEmbeddedObjectContainer https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43867

Re: [Libreoffice] Old Oracle Mysql Connector no longer works with 3.5 on Windows - looking for a regular build solution ?

Hi Stephan, 2012/1/5 Stephan Bergmann > On 01/04/2012 11:02 PM, Alex Thurgood wrote: > >> Unfortunately, I'm not on Windows. I can only build on Linux and Mac. Am >> looking to test with gdb on Linux to see what is being called (or not) >> as the case may be. >> > > But the bug as described onl

Re: [Libreoffice] minor idl fixes

On 01/05/2012 09:38 AM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: Stephan Bergmann writes: On 01/04/2012 11:09 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: diff --git a/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl b/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl ... Are you sure that this is right, using chart2 entities from within ch

Re: [Libreoffice] minor idl fixes

Hi Stephan, Stephan Bergmann writes: > On 01/04/2012 11:09 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > >> diff --git a/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl >> b/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl >> ... > > Are you sure that this is right, using chart2 entities from within > chart? I always intu

Re: [Libreoffice] Old Oracle Mysql Connector no longer works with 3.5 on Windows - looking for a regular build solution ?

Hi Stephan, On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > In that case, I doubt that inspecting Linux behaviour gives a clue to what > fails on Windows.  I suspect it rather has something to do with the Windows > MSVC runtime libraries or somesuch. As far as I can see, LibreOffice

Re: [Libreoffice] minor idl fixes

On 01/04/2012 11:09 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: diff --git a/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl b/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl index f87d245..cfb42b6 100644 --- a/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl +++ b/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@