Re: [Libreoffice] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

Hello Tomas, Ok, I wrote a simple c++ based test for that and can't reproduce your problem. The test ( http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=b77902d38d06df87694564ded859733bdb1d4fb2 ) creates an empty document, checks that it has a second sheet( bad assumption there from me) an

[Libreoffice] hello

Mail transaction failed. Partial message is available. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] Build problems (and some solutions) in Mac OSX

Hello All, I have burned about 1.5 GB of metered network bandwidth, so far, following these instructions: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_build#Getting_the_sources I have found and, I think fixed, problems which occur on both origin/master and origin/libreoffice-3-5, where

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] 1/4 tools/rtti.hxx cleaning

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 13:03 -0430, Rafael Dominguez wrote: > > Just some cleanup of tools/rtti.hxx macros for c++ RTTI. > > Gosh :-) you are brave. I suppose there is some residual > performance > concern about this sor

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] [RFC] COMPRESSMODE_FULL

Matteo Casalin wrote: > Here are the patches for *completely* removing COMPRESSMODE_FULL > support. > Applied as-is, good work - and the identical commit msg are a feature, not a bug. Good riddance hand-rolled compression code. :) What are you up for next? Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpMyZnsIMmFD.pgp

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] 1/4 tools/rtti.hxx cleaning

Hi Rafael, On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 13:03 -0430, Rafael Dominguez wrote: > Just some cleanup of tools/rtti.hxx macros for c++ RTTI. Gosh :-) you are brave. I suppose there is some residual performance concern about this sort of thing; then again I think that many of our SfxItemSet items are

[Libreoffice] DISTRIBUIDOR MSI

Seu cliente de e-mail não pode ler este e-mail. Para visualizá-lo on-line, por favor, clique aqui: http://enviandonoticias.com/display.php?M=87167&C=7864f54b2517959f8a2bff2f40abf895&S=32&L=24&N=36 Para parar de receber nossos Emails:http://enviandonoticias.com/unsubscribe.php?M=87167&C=7864f54b2

Re: [Libreoffice] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

Hey, let me check that. If it is a bug I'll create a test and fix it for beta3. Markus ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 07:26:21PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > sounds like a bug to me. guess you should file it in bugzilla and set > the "regression" keyword. Any you could try bibisect: http://sweetshark.livejournal.com/7683.html to close in on the bug even more (and thus make it get fixed fa

[Libreoffice] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

hi Tomas, you are much more likely to get a reply for this kind of bug on the dev list. On 19/12/11 16:32, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > Hi all, > > something has changed recently and it is not possible to remove sheets > via uno calls anymore. It used to work with v3.4.4 but fails with > v3.5b0 and v

[Libreoffice] License statement

For the record, all CodeWeavers contributions are licensed under the MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license. Cheers, Jeremy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 --- Comment #58 from Astron 2011-12-19 09:45:29 PST --- Propose to add this: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43738 Two of our bundled extensions don't work on Windows. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.c

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] 4/4 tools/rtti.hxx cleaning

From c5625c7f1ad2a2ba7158c79ee5055a261d057225 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rafael Dominguez Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 19:29:26 -0430 Subject: [PATCH 32/36] Replace deprecated PTR_CAST macro for dynamic_cast. --- sd/source/ui/slideshow/slideshowimpl.cxx |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+)

[Libreoffice] dyld install_name: Re: What do we want from extensions module?

On 18/12/11 12:05, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi Michel, *, > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Michael Stahl wrote: >> On 14/12/11 23:28, Peter Foley wrote: >>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Michael Stahl wrote: >> [...] >> - the spotlight plugin: >> no idea if that will actually work; >> i really ho

Re: [Libreoffice] Notifications between different SfxObjectShells

Hi Markus, On Monday, 2011-12-19 03:53:57 +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > I'm trying to improve calc's copy behavior but I'm a bit stuck with > the last step. I need to get a notification if another document is > being saved because I may need to adjust the reference to this > document. I found a

Re: [Libreoffice] Brittle unit test dependencies

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 04:13:10PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Just to be clear: This is unrelated to and does not solve the > problem of those non-obvious runtime dependencies. Well, if the installation is in gbuild completely, you could depend on everything in the installation dir from a t

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild'ified salhelper

On 19 December 2011 14:59, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Yes, calling directly indeed looks right.  I suppose the original intent > was not to link against Windows code for the > InternetGetConnectedStateEx() function in extensions/ ; but I think it > is fine, the code in extensions/ is #ifdef WNT there

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild'ified salhelper

On 12/19/2011 10:25 AM, Matúš Kukan wrote: Stephan, could you please check if .map files for sal, cppu and purpenvhelper are correct ? The symbols from solenv/bin/addsym.awk were missing. Fixed now. Stephan ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@l

Re: [Libreoffice] Brittle unit test dependencies

On 12/19/2011 03:42 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 02:21:45PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: My hope of course, is that as we finish gbuild, and move our solver to look ever more like an install set, it'll get easier and less hacky to run these unit tests; eg. with you

Re: [Libreoffice] What do we want from extensions module?

On 18 December 2011 02:39, Michael Stahl wrote: > - i have not moved hidother.src, i have no idea what it does; it is >  referenced from toolkit/src2xml/src.lst and i have no idea what isthat > These hidother.src files are in more modules, I am removing them when porting to gbuild. ___

Re: [Libreoffice] l10n Racecondition in sdext/source/pdfimport

Hi Bjoern, 2011/12/19 Bjoern Michaelsen : > I just fixed a tricky race condition for l10n builds with: > >  http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=f2a1882be486986a76682ed51f481595e1cf0d5c > > on master. Before it, parallel l10n builds could break, because all > description-*.txt w

Re: [Libreoffice] Brittle unit test dependencies

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 02:21:45PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > My hope of course, is that as we finish gbuild, and move our solver to > look ever more like an install set, it'll get easier and less hacky to > run these unit tests; eg. with your nice 'services' work, we could even > install

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] removing mpNotes field from ScBaseCell

On Saturday 17 of December 2011, Noel Grandin wrote: > Hi > > So I've been working on this patch to move mpNotes from ScBaseCell to > ScTable, and I got it mostly working. > But I was struggling with leaks and getting the lifecycle of the notes > to exactly match the lifecycle of the ScBaseCell obj

Re: [Libreoffice] Brittle unit test dependencies

On 12/19/2011 03:21 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: Well; hopefully the tinderboxen catch them for us over time - how did you find this one ? But even if we find more and more missing dependencies over time, this does not solve the maintainability problem. No longer necessary dependencies w

Re: [Libreoffice] Brittle unit test dependencies

Hi Stephan, On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 14:10 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > > "Tests apparently depend on localedata_en library." is yet another > non-obvious dependency the "large" unit tests in s

Re: [Libreoffice] libicudata ICU data info

On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 23:44 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote: > There's an easier way by using the ICU data library customizer available > at http://apps.icu-project.org/datacustom/ I put Mike off this ;-) but it seems to be the right way to go (sorry Mike) :-) [ Eike is really the domain expert

[Libreoffice] development summary: year 2011, week 50

Hi, this time a brief summary of what happened during the 49th week in 2011 on LibreOffice repositories and the living branches: + master:LO-3.5 development + libreoffice-3-5: fixes for LO-3.5.0 release + libreoffice-3-4: fixes for potential LO-3.4.6 bug fi

Re: [Libreoffice] What do we want from extensions module?

On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 02:39 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > that is really great work! Indeed ! particularly since it is (IIRC) the last blocker to getting tons more modules into tail_build, and hence getting real LTO going that should help us glup much of the suite into a single library an

Re: [Libreoffice] manipulating cursors/selections in writer with accessibility api's (bug 43390)

Hello Vincent, On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 18:24 -0600, Vincent Povirk wrote: > I'm working for CodeWeavers on a project that uses accessibility API's > (specifically at-spi 2) to manipulate text fields. I cannot publicly > disclose the exact nature of this project before its release, though > it may be

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild'ified salhelper

Hi Matus, On 2011-12-19 at 10:25 +0100, Matúš Kukan wrote: > And I did not convert onlinecheck.dll library because it's just one > function [1] and probably can be called directly ? > I think Kendy is working on online update libs ? > Is it ok or should I convert also onlinecheck library for Wind

[Libreoffice] Brittle unit test dependencies

"Tests apparently depend on localedata_en library." is yet another non-obvious dependency the "large" unit tests in sc, sw etc. have on their environment. I fear that the approach of having such "

Re: [Libreoffice] c++ sample for calc add-on

On 12/19/2011 01:24 PM, Michael Stahl wrote: By the way: I have to replace the onboard libstdc++ in ure-link/lib by the system libstdc++ to use other libraries. Why is there on old libstdc++? i think by now it is mostly for historic reasons. until 5 years ago or so g++ and libstdc++ regularly c

Re: [Libreoffice] c++ sample for calc add-on

Hi Lars, On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 21:33 +0100, Lars Callenbach wrote: > I have a template for the quantlib addin which works for OO3.2. > Unfortunately it does not work for LibreOffice-3.4. Does anybody have > a template with necessary interface functions in c++ for LO-3.4? I > have looked at the c++

Re: [Libreoffice] c++ sample for calc add-on

On 17/12/11 21:33, Lars Callenbach wrote: > Hello, > > I have a template for the quantlib addin which works for OO3.2. > Unfortunately it does not work for LibreOffice-3.4. i'm not familiar with Calc addins, but in general UNO based extensions are supposed to work with newer versions as well (unl

Re: [Libreoffice] Git pull problems

On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 15:30 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Thanks for your suggestion, but I tried with and without the trailing > circumflex to no avail. I just re-cloned in the end, which sorted things > out. Gosh - I'm sorry about that. I'd have been curious to see the results of '

[Libreoffice] Fwd: [Bug 41291] [EasyHack] Create a Libreoffice build session with playterm to help new developers

Hi List, Let me repost this request for help/support to give it some broader visibility (and shamelessly plug my pet Easy Hack) as I really dont know too much about ttyrec. Best, Bjoern - Forwarded message from bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org - Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 06:04:39 + From

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] Remove OOoImprovement

On 12/18/2011 08:40 PM, Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote: By the way: is the gbuild conversion project removing some of the basis for this feature or did I misunderstand that? It is getting rid of testtool that removes a feature introduced by testtool and reused by oooimprovement. The removal of t

[Libreoffice] [patch] translate some german comments in /svx

Hi More translations, work by Mike Whiteley and Noel Grandin, patch is under MPL/LGPL+ Regards, Noel Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html diff --git a/svx/inc/svx/obj3d.hxx b/svx/inc/svx/obj3d.hxx index 5cf5d03..e2d7e2d 100644 --- a/svx/inc/svx/obj3d.hxx +++ b/svx/inc/svx/obj3d.

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] Remove OOoImprovement

On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 20:40 +0100, Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote: > Here's an idea: building the server side for this should be a > medium-size task that is also separate from most of LibO and requires > lots of new code, so wouldn't this be ideal as a GSoC task? Sounds like a good idea to

[Libreoffice] REMINDER: Release 3.5.0-beta2 from libreoffice-3-5 branch

Hi, please note that the commit deadline for 3.5.0-beta2 is today (Monday), December 19, 2011. Note that the commit deadline for the next and last beta is on January 9, 2011. See also http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.5_release http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED-3-4] [REVIEW-3-4] Reverted - Fix overly zealous check in Zip package consistency

> Michael Meeks wrote: > > can't we just revert the original fix there ? > > > Reverted with Stephan's review in -3-4. Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpUDhanxrWzO.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http

[Libreoffice] l10n Racecondition in sdext/source/pdfimport

Hi all, I just fixed a tricky race condition for l10n builds with: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=f2a1882be486986a76682ed51f481595e1cf0d5c on master. Before it, parallel l10n builds could break, because all description-*.txt were copied by every locale (as the rule was

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild'ified salhelper

On 15 December 2011 23:04, Michael Stahl wrote: > > done, see newly added gb_Library_set_soversion_script > Thanks for this So I have also pushed sal and cppu: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=a9e130ab82f3216334e432e9d6ee19a600b6c287 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/

Re: [Libreoffice] Fwd: InterFace 1.2.0 - New Open Source Social Network as Chat Messenger Addon

> What about to add this Messenger to Libre Office? Feel free to submit patches. I don't personally see any reason for this, though, but hey, I just work here. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] bug#36874 to be patched in 3.4.5 as well?

>> Is it an option to push it to 3.4.5 as well? >In case you haven't known this yet: if you want to do this, you have >to send a mail to this dev list with a subject like > [REVIEW] $subject >and pointing to your commit. Then wait for someone to review. This probably is still not the correct way