On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 06:45:30PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 04:19:04PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> * postgresql fun. non-internal
>> + Windows - run-time DLL dependency a pain (Lionel)
>> + ship DLL ourselves ?
> This is not a question mark,
2011/12/11 Fridrich Strba :
> On 10/12/11 07:34, Petr Mladek wrote:
>>
>> The 64-bit build for few localizations is being uploaded at
>>
>> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/Linux_x86_64_Release_Configuration/libreoffice-3-5/
>>
>> It is built the same way like the 32-bit build, see above. We
2011/12/11 Andras Timar :
> Before I pushed my patch (3fbedc3e8f65c91999dcee42daa8312e387dcf40) I
> build from scratch with MSVC successfully. However, I learned a few
> hours later that I broke MinGW build.
> http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/cgi-bin/gunzip.cgi?tree=MASTER&brief-log=1323606001.2565
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Mihkel Tõnnov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||41996
--- Comment #237 from Mihkel Tõnno
On 11/12/11 15:17, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Which suggests --without-system-postgresql is broken, need to check
that out.
Works, at least on Debian GNU/Linux.
Does it mean that the --without-system-postgresql is working now?
If not, first thing to check (on other platforms then x86 would be
On 09/12/11 23:10, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
And with attached patch, also a plain --enable-ext-postgresql-sdbc
builds - Norbert, want to double-check& commit?
Sorry, I added that all-static-lib to the target unconditionally, since
that is not harming anything. I did not read this e-mail. I wou
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:41:22 +0100, Rainer Bielefeld
wrote:
Tommy schrieb:
probably the code in 3.5.x has been cleaned and there's no place for the
classic theme yet, but just for the other themes (Tango, Galaxy etc.
etc.)
Hi,
And what's your theory concerning the fact that (at least)
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 01:53:20AM +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> Stephan Bergmann wrote:
libpq.5.dylib (compatibility version 5.0.0, current version 5.3.0)
>>> That way it won't be found at runtime. If it is a lib from the
>>> system, it should have an absolute path (like the ones be
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 05:48:54PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:58 AM, lio...@mamane.lu wrote:
>> There seems to be a failure in sfx2/sdi/sfxitems.sdi
>> (see attachment and
>> http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/cgi-bin/gunzip.cgi?tree=MASTER&full-log=1323593401.280
Hi Lionel, *,
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:58 AM, lio...@mamane.lu wrote:
>
> There seems to be a failure in sfx2/sdi/sfxitems.sdi
> (see attachment and
> http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/cgi-bin/gunzip.cgi?tree=MASTER&full-log=1323593401.28011#err677
Any reason why you are using the huge full-log
Tommy schrieb:
probably the code in 3.5.x has been cleaned and there's no place for the
classic theme yet, but just for the other themes (Tango, Galaxy etc. etc.)
Hi,
And what's your theory concerning the fact that (at least) tango theme
copied from 3.4 to master will not work, too?
CU
R
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 15:39:08 +0100, Korrawit Pruegsanusak
wrote:
Hello all,
/me separate this into new thread. :)
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:47, Korrawit Pruegsanusak
wrote:
So, do we really support classic and industrial themes? I've found
them listed
on ooo_custom_images [1], but I'm
Hello all,
/me separate this into new thread. :)
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:47, Korrawit Pruegsanusak
wrote:
> Last but not least, I've noticed that there are two themes, classic
> and industrial, that described in AS_HELP_STRING (see context in first
> patch) but not detected while checking (se
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:34:34 +0100, Pedro Lino wrote:
I think this carries (from a QA point of vue) a much heavier
responsibility and care than the change from 3.4.4 to 3.5.0 (which is
"experimental")
The planned release date for 3.4.5 is on January 11, 2012 and
apparently there won't be any
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 03:09:41PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Which suggests --without-system-postgresql is broken, need to check
> that out.
Works, at least on Debian GNU/Linux.
--
Lionel
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedes
Hi,
I was hacking on VersionInfo resource of Windows executables and I
noticed that DLLs built with dmake always have this resource, they
include solenv/inc/shlinfo.rc. But DLLs built with gmake does not have
VersionInfo resource by default. Is this normal? Executables are fully
functional without
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:05:02AM +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Le 09/12/11 23:10, Thorsten Behrens a écrit :
>> And with attached patch, also a plain --enable-ext-postgresql-sdbc
>> builds - Norbert, want to double-check & commit?
> So I built yesterday using :
> --with-ext-postgresql-sdb
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 05:18:36PM +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 14:28, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Well, IMHO the example is correct _with_ quotation marks, else the
>> shell will cut it into several arguments.
>> [cut]
>> On which platform have you encountered t
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 06:21:52PM +, Alex Thurgood wrote:
> The stuff you just committed looks interesting,
Thanks :)
--
Lionel
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffi
Hello Fridrich, all,
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:54, Fridrich Strba
wrote:
> No, not needed to check anything. If you have a compiler, you have them.
> They are part of the compiler installation.
Thanks, I check my installation and I just didn't install the merge module.
Sorry for the noise anywa
Hello Lionel,
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 14:28, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Well, IMHO the example is correct _with_ quotation marks, else the
> shell will cut it into several arguments.
> [cut]
> On which platform have you encountered the "it breaks with quotation
> marks, but works without quotati
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 09:33:15AM +0100, Laurent Godard wrote:
> do you think it would be possible to cherry-pick these SDK example
> commits to 3.5. I see no potential negative impact
As a general idea, it looks good, but personally I miss the background
to evaluate the CSS bits, so I'll leave
Hi,
Just to make sure someone that knows that part of the code gets a
notice (rather than only unrelated people):
There seems to be a failure in sfx2/sdi/sfxitems.sdi
(see attachment and
http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/cgi-bin/gunzip.cgi?tree=MASTER&full-log=1323593401.28011#err677
)
which is un
Hi Lionel
thanks a lot
do you think it would be possible to cherry-pick these SDK example
commits to 3.5. I see no potential negative impact
Then, one could put the exemple section online on
http://api.libreoffice.org ?
the related commits are
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit
24 matches
Mail list logo
