[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] update [PATCH]cosmetic around SDK and python

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:22:28AM +0100, Laurent Godard wrote: > I just realized that the index.html examples age still referenced > OOo Pushed. Thanks. -- Lionel ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop

[Libreoffice] [PARTIAL-PUSHED] [PATCH] configure.in examples: options shouldn't have quote

On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:47:02AM +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: > I've attached two cosmetic patches of configure.in. First patch > fixes an example in AS_HELP_STRING. The configure options shouldn't > be passed with quotation marks, as described in commit message. Well, IMHO the example

Re: [Libreoffice] LibO daily builds on Fedora 16: oxygen GTK undefined cairo symbol

Hi, Le 11/12/2011 08:13, Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit : > Hi, > > I asked a bug reporter to retest with a daily, but he/she reports that > the daily doesn't run on Fedora 16; see attachment. Anybody has some > advice for him/her? First of all, he/she should try with a clean profile (rename ~/.libr

[Libreoffice] LibO daily builds on Fedora 16: oxygen GTK undefined cairo symbol

Hi, I asked a bug reporter to retest with a daily, but he/she reports that the daily doesn't run on Fedora 16; see attachment. Anybody has some advice for him/her? Thanks in advance, -- Lionel --- Begin Message --- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34432 sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com

Re: [Libreoffice] Call for LO-3.5.0-beta1 pre-tag testing

On 10/12/11 07:34, Petr Mladek wrote: The 64-bit build for few localizations is being uploaded at http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/Linux_x86_64_Release_Configuration/libreoffice-3-5/ It is built the same way like the 32-bit build, see above. We started the regular tinderbox again. Please

Re: [Libreoffice] Does merge modules necessary only for msi installer?

On 11/12/11 06:32, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: I was wondering whether "merge modules" you've introduced [1] is necessary for only msi installer creation? If yes, IMHO maybe we need more specific check in post_download.in, to check for --with-package-format configure option, instead of currently

[Libreoffice] Does merge modules necessary only for msi installer?

Hello Andras, all, I was wondering whether "merge modules" you've introduced [1] is necessary for only msi installer creation? If yes, IMHO maybe we need more specific check in post_download.in, to check for --with-package-format configure option, instead of currently if test "$COM" = "MSC"; [2

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] configure.in examples: options shouldn't have quote

Hello all, I've attached two cosmetic patches of configure.in. First patch fixes an example in AS_HELP_STRING. The configure options shouldn't be passed with quotation marks, as described in commit message. But I'm not sure whether it's correct or apply to all platform. So, I sent it here for a re

Re: [Libreoffice] Adding a Predictive Typing feature.

On 12/09/2011 01:04 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: Hi, Le 09/12/2011 06:26, Shoubhik Bose a écrit : Hello, what is the difference with auto-completion : Tools> AutoCorrect>>options ...> Word completion Tab ? The suggestions are based only on what has been typed in the document before. I a

Re: [Libreoffice] End of the line for 3.3 family and regressions

Hi Michael >        Seems that Eike picked this to -3-4 shortly after you mentioned it ;-) > of course, if there are more annoying, but trivial / obvious fixes we > need to get into 3.4.5 it'd be great to know ASAP - the freeze for 3.4.5 > RC1 is early next week, and I'd really like not to see ~an

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Fix for fdo43460, Part I, getLength to isEmpty

On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 19:07 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > This and a few more that follow invert the logic -- !sText.getLength() > <=> sText.getLength() == 0 <=> sText.isEmpty(). I'll fix those and push > later today. Found pushed; thanks Stephan & Olivier, Regards,

Re: [Libreoffice] End of the line for 3.3 family and regressions

Hi Pedro, On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 20:34 +, Pedro Lino wrote: > E.g. A bug fix such as this > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42958 > needs to be "cherry picked" to the 3.4 branch Seems that Eike picked this to -3-4 shortly after you mentioned it ;-) of course, if there are

Re: [Libreoffice] stubify ...

On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 09:32 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > The question becomes is it worth hacking to get LO to work on centos 4, > if I am not mistaken its almost at the end of live. If i remember right > end of january or februrary its slated to be archived from what i saw on > the update

[Libreoffice] Check This Out

Friend was viewing Elizabeth's Fiber and Yarn and thought you would be interested in this page: Elizabeth's Fiber and Yarn http://www.fiber2yarn.com/catalog.php?item=1678 Friend also included this message: ^^

Re: [Libreoffice] Writing a book w/F16?

On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 10:17 -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 13:57 +0100, NOSpaze wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 20:50 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > On 12/10/2011 08:34 PM, Craig White wrote: > > > > is there any doubt who this NOSpaze is? > > > > > > Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove unused macro in tools/rtti.hxx

From b052d080fd068f7ba1ba71a086ed0dcbc24299ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rafael Dominguez Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:42:29 -0430 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Remove unused macros. --- tools/inc/tools/rtti.hxx |9 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/inc/

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] End of the line for 3.3 family and regressions

Hi Pedro, *, Pedro Lino wrote (10-12-11 12:46) So, what should we do to each group of bugs? Anyway, I'm not sure whether there are how many bugs in each group, or even there is any bug in some group. Maybe we need separate discussion? It is already for some time now, that there is need for mo

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for fdo43460, Part IV, getLength to isEmpty

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please find attached a partial fix for Easy Hack FDO43460 Part IV Module basic (small cosmetic fix per demand of Ivan Timofeev) binaryurp bridges - -- Olivier Hallot Founder, Board of Directors Member - The Document Foundation LibreOffice translatio

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] Call for LO-3.5.0-beta1 pre-tag testing

Cor Nouws wrote (09-12-11 22:44) Linux (still not uploaded): will have to wait for those though ;-) Was able to install today on Ubuntu 32 bits and did some simple things (among which 2400+ record mail merge - which goes fine&fast). Saw some things that are not ok, but not yet items that ar

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for fdo43460, Part II, getLength to isEmpty

Hi Oliver, nice! I had introduced this method, but this move was still on todo. Thanks for doing this :) Thomas On 12/10/2011 01:29 AM, Olivier Hallot wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please find attached a partial fix for Easy Hack FDO43460, Part II Module basctl - --

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 4/4] Replace Table with std::map

--- svl/source/misc/inettype.cxx | 38 ++ 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/svl/source/misc/inettype.cxx b/svl/source/misc/inettype.cxx index 1cba9dc..b043f06 100644 --- a/svl/source/misc/inettype.cxx +++ b/svl/source/misc/inett

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 3/4] Replace _SvxForbiddenCharacterTable_Impl with std::map

--- cui/source/options/optasian.cxx | 73 +++ 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/cui/source/options/optasian.cxx b/cui/source/options/optasian.cxx index 5cafe5d..326f4dc 100644 --- a/cui/source/options/optasian.cxx +++ b/cui/sour

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 2/4] Replace Table with std::map

--- cui/source/dialogs/pastedlg.cxx | 20 cui/source/inc/pastedlg.hxx |4 ++-- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/cui/source/dialogs/pastedlg.cxx b/cui/source/dialogs/pastedlg.cxx index 47fdf2f..656a813 100644 --- a/cui/source/dialogs/p

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 1/4] fdo38832 Replace ImplAccelTable with std::map

Hello lo-devs, This patch series replaces some DECLARE_TABLE macros with the std::map equivalent. regards Marcel --- vcl/source/window/accel.cxx | 20 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/vcl/source/window/accel.cxx b/vcl/source/window/accel.c

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] Fix for fdo43460, Part III, getLength to isEmpty

10.12.2011 20:34, Olivier Hallot пишет: Please find attached a partial fix for Easy Hack FDO43460, Part III Module basic Pushed, thank you! :) May I suggest you to remove unnecessary parentheses in addition? i.e sal_Bool bOldPassword = ( !OldPassword.isEmpty() ); can be sal

Re: [Libreoffice] build error

>Looks like a symbol conflict between your internal cairo library and >the system gtk+ library. Curious that it happens with the cppunit test >of course. Essentially I would remove *cairo* from the solver (or run >deliver -delete inside cairo/) and re-configure and build with >--with-system-cairo.

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for fdo43460, Part III, getLength to isEmpty

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please find attached a partial fix for Easy Hack FDO43460, Part III Module basic - -- Olivier Hallot Founder, Board of Directors Member - The Document Foundation LibreOffice translation leader for Brazilian Portuguese +55-21-8822-8812 -BEGIN PGP

Re: [Libreoffice] postresql-sdbc bits out of minutes of tech. steering call

On 10/12/11 11:05, Alexander Thurgood wrote: So I built yesterday using : --with-ext-postgresql-sdbc --with-system-postgresql Would you mind to try --without-system-postgresql (and fix eventual breakage). That might actually help making a nice extension that would run on a system that does n

Re: [Libreoffice] minor idl fixes

Hi Michael, > Nice work - thanks :-) It'd be great if you could give an explicit > licensing statement for your contributions; something like: > > "All my contributions to LibreOffice are licensed under >the MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license" > > or somesuch :-) then we can add yo

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] End of the line for 3.3 family and regressions

Hi Korrawit, all > So, what should we do to each group of bugs? Anyway, I'm not sure > whether there are how many bugs in each group, or even there is any > bug in some group. Maybe we need separate discussion? This isn't simply a matter of checking and reporting bugs. It involves the Quality of

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] End of the line for 3.3 family and regressions

Hello Pedro, all, This maybe a bit off topic, but IMHO we have some general cases, for example: * the bug is explicitly fixed in next 3.4/3.5 release, but not in reporter's version * the bug disappeared in next 3.4/3.5 release, without explicit fix * the bug that isn't fixed yet since 3.3 release,

Re: [Libreoffice] OT Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Call for LO-3.5.0-beta1 pre-tag testing

Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > is there a way to remove "fdo37195" from > > It only has been created for 1 particular test I had to do some > times ago and never will be used again. > Removed, thanks for noticing. -- Thorsten pgpS4mGGHGM8P.pgp Description:

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] Fix for fdo43460, Part II, getLength to isEmpty

...and I forgot to change the subject :) Ivan ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] postresql-sdbc bits out of minutes of tech. steering call

Le 09/12/11 23:10, Thorsten Behrens a écrit : Hi Thorsten, >> > And with attached patch, also a plain --enable-ext-postgresql-sdbc > builds - Norbert, want to double-check & commit? > So I built yesterday using : --with-ext-postgresql-sdbc --with-system-postgresql and I get a connector OXT

Re: [Libreoffice] stubify ...

On 09/12/2011 22:46, Michael Meeks wrote: So, I have an horrendous hack that -just-might- solve our CentOS 4 build problems around dependencies. It is (essentially) the output of 'bin/stubify.pl' (just pushed to master) run on a more modern machine. Michael, The question becomes is i

Re: [Libreoffice] Call for LO-3.5.0-beta1 pre-tag testing

Petr Mladek schrieb: could you please do some testing with the last daily builds from the libreoffice-3-5 branch? See below where to get them. Hi, I have been testing for some hours doing my normal daily work without bigger bad surprises. So it seems we are on a good way for Beta 1,

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for fdo43460, Part II, getLength to isEmpty

Hi Olivier, 10.12.2011 04:29, Olivier Hallot пишет: Please find attached a partial fix for Easy Hack FDO43460, Part II Module basctl very nice, pushed now: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=1688a9d9235dd2ee4f3b9497308efd41f7a3fb6f Thanks! Ivan __

[Libreoffice] OT Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Call for LO-3.5.0-beta1 pre-tag testing

Thorsten Behrens schrieb: Hi Thorsten, is there a way to remove "fdo37195" from It only has been created for 1 particular test I had to do some times ago and never will be used again. Best regards Rainer ___

[Libreoffice] update [PATCH]cosmetic around SDK and python

Hi again sorry for the multiple submission I just realized that the index.html examples age still referenced OOo here is the updated patch laurent >From fe27f33008eaf9789a6e113c7685abd6842b38ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Laurent Godard Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 17:24:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] m

[Libreoffice] [PATCH]cosmetic around SDK and python

Hi all Here is a cosmetic patch around python and sdk also added a readme on ToolPanel example Laurent >From 051740c220b4d97897aa8da7ba6f5da325d409ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Laurent Godard Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 17:24:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] minor around python and SDK - add Python as a