Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [PATCH] Make the toolbars not popping-up randomly

Hi Christoph, On 2011-11-18 at 23:56 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: > Well, since I wanted to try out other features as well, I've installed a > recent daily build and here are some comments. Before I start, I really > have to say that the concept derived from OOo has its disadvantages > (whether

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] FDO #40505 - UI: HYPHENATION Right/Left arrow key reversed (keyboard)

Hi Niklas, On 2011-11-18 at 10:10 +, Noel Power wrote: > > It's my first contribution to the source of LO so I hope I've done > > everything correctly. > > Please let me know otherwise. > > everything perfect, nice patch, commit is here > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?

Re: [Libreoffice] error when building cmis stuff

Hi Noel, Michael, On 2011-11-16 at 11:24 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > > I'm getting a build fail using Cygwin on Windows when building the > > ucb/cmis module. > > > > From a cursory examination it looks like some .. are missing from the > > path to the cms_provider object files? > > indeed, i

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [PATCH] Make the toolbars not popping-up randomly

Hi Cor, hi all! Am Freitag, den 18.11.2011, 23:08 +0100 schrieb Cor Nouws: > Christoph Noack wrote (18-11-11 22:01) > > > Well, I think I don't get everything from the technical description, > > With the patch, initially the pop-up-behaving toolbars are docked above > the status bar. Thanks fo

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] More icons removal

Hi Michael, Michael Meeks schrieb: On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 19:40 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote: I tried them with a clean-build to avoid any building issues and removed the reference one by one to make sure I did not miss anything. I'm not sure about sx03216.png. Isn't that icon used for wizard

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [PATCH] Make the toolbars not popping-up randomly

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Christoph Noack wrote: > Hi Tim, hi Michael, hello Kohei, all! > > Am Donnerstag, den 17.11.2011, 13:58 + schrieb Michael Meeks: > > Hi Tim, > > > > Great feature; lets see what the UX advise guys have to say about > it. > > Prolly they'll want to play w

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Cor Nouws changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||42684 --- Comment #233 from Cor Nouws 2011-

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] fix for fdo#40831 - Writer will crash when searching text with using regular expressions

On 16/11/11 16:08, Tomofumi Yagi wrote: > I attached a revised patch. hi Tomofumi, thank you for your patch; i have pushed it, but not as a fix to the bug 40831 :) > On 17/11/11 09:27, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 16:20 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: >>> now

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] More icons removal

On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 19:40 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote: > > I tried them with a clean-build to avoid any building issues and > > removed the reference one by one to make sure I did not miss anything. > > I'm not sure about sx03216.png. Isn't that icon used for wizards in File > > Wizards?

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [PATCH] Word count dialog modeless

Hi Matt, Kevin, Michael, Astron ... all! First and foremost, Matt, thank you for the extremely helpful patch ... or (speaking as a non-developer), for the great improvement. Awesome! I finally had some time to test it and I'd like to point out three (mostly tiny) things... First, since the dialo

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [PATCH] Make the toolbars not popping-up randomly

Christoph Noack wrote (18-11-11 22:01) Well, I think I don't get everything from the technical description, With the patch, initially the pop-up-behaving toolbars are docked above the status bar. so I really have to try. At the moment, I'm thinking about stuff like potentially increased mo

Re: [Libreoffice] Howto develop an extension with URE?

On 18/11/11 20:41, Christian Ehrlicher wrote: > The kde4 plugin for libreoffice has a problem - creating qpixmaps > outside the main thread is no allowed - crashes and the other end gives > me the error message. in case this is your only problem you can select another VCL plugin: e.g. use this i

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] writer AnchoredObjects accessed after deletion under some circumstances

On 10/11/11 17:44, Caolán McNamara wrote: > So, I have a document which triggers the attached traces.txt if I close > the document before the layout completes. > > Here's what I think I see. The SwView goes away first, and the writer > layout hierarchy goes away with it. Then the SwDoc goes away.

Re: [Libreoffice] iOS and convert to PDF

>> this isn't a suitable way to develop code. >Indeed not. It is a way to experiment before some saner way exists, >nothing more. Xcode has a way to import makefiles and turn them into projects. I've never used that feature but it might be a way to use the existing build system. http://develo

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [PATCH] Make the toolbars not popping-up randomly

Hi Tim, hi Michael, hello Kohei, all! Am Donnerstag, den 17.11.2011, 13:58 + schrieb Michael Meeks: > Hi Tim, > > Great feature; lets see what the UX advise guys have to say about it. > Prolly they'll want to play with the next dev build. Sure, will try ... I hope others as well. [...

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [PATCH] Start Impress without the wizard by default

Hi Michael, Tim, all! @ Michael: As always, thanks for forwarding. @ Tim: Thanks for the patch! :-) Am Freitag, den 18.11.2011, 15:54 + schrieb Michael Meeks: > On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 16:37 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > > We do have " Tools > Options > Impress > General ... > New document .. > >

Re: [Libreoffice] iOS and convert to PDF

> this isn't a suitable way to develop code. Indeed not. It is a way to experiment before some saner way exists, nothing more. > Is that where  you got the NSEnumerator stuff? Most likely, I can't remember writing anything such myself... > I guess it's an antique like all the Mac stuff. Indeed

[Libreoffice] URE bootstrap - error establishing connection ?

Hi, When I try to connect to libreoffice over a uno socket (com.sun.star.bridge.UnoUrlResolver) in most cases I need to try at least two times because the socket is not (yet) open: Cannot establish a connection using 'uno:socket,host=localhost,port=2083;urp;StarOffice.ServiceManager': Connecto

Re: [Libreoffice] iOS and convert to PDF

> Ah, yes. I "faked" it from Xcode's point of view: Yikes. OK, I tried this, or something like it. Even though the iOS build is broken that binary builds before the build stops. I copied it into an app bundle in the Sim and launched it. I saw a red screen and some output in the system console so

Re: [Libreoffice] Howto develop an extension with URE?

Stephan Bergmann schrieb: Now when I try to use the provided rdb I get an error when I try to load a document: "LoadFromUrl failed: Binary URP bridge disposed during call - file:///home/chehrlic/Dokumente/test.odp" Out of curiosity the documentloader example can load my document and I can't find

Re: [Libreoffice] Gmane address mangling

On 21/10/11 13:33, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Michael Stahl wrote: >> would anybody object to turning it off? >> > Nope, go for it. It has bitten a few others before already... it's disabled since a couple of days now... ___ LibreOffice mailing list Libr

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Improved Header/Footer UI framerate

Thanks for the reply :-) Sorry for the license, I meant MPL/LGPLv3+. I'm still a newbie to the coding world, and my C/C++ knowledge is still very basic, so for now I'd rather not be added to the developers' list. It was more a small tweak rather than an actual patch. 2011/11/18 Michael Meeks > H

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Some OSL cleanup

Hi, The first patch replace the usage of gethostbyname by the reentrant version. The second and third patch removes internal gethostbyname_r, backtrace and backtrace_symbols_fd. I'm not sure about these two patches, those functions are in the libc on all current OS and symbols are not exported.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] More icons removal

Hi Julien, Julien Chaffraix schrieb: Hi everyone, attached are more icons removals. I tried them with a clean-build to avoid any building issues and removed the reference one by one to make sure I did not miss anything. I'm not sure about sx03216.png. Isn't that icon used for wizards in File

Re: [Libreoffice] report from ODF Plugfest Gouda

other interesting stuff on interoperability at the plugfest. Two things about features not (yet) included in ODF. - One is Unique features fallback http://plugtest.opendocsociety.org/doku.php?id=scenarios:2018:uniquefeatures Objective: an alternative way (fall back) to present the da

Re: [Libreoffice] License statement

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Julien Chaffraix wrote: > Hi fellow hackers, > > All current and past contributions made to the LibreOffice project are > done under the GPLv3 / MPL or later version of these licenses. Did you mean LGPLv3/MPL ? Norbert ___

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] More icons removal

Hi Julien, On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 08:43 -0800, Julien Chaffraix wrote: > attached are more icons removals. Nice :-) > I tried them with a clean-build to avoid any building issues and > removed the reference one by one to make sure I did not miss anything. So - just one quick quer

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [PATCH] Start Impress without the wizard by default

Michael Meeks wrote (18-11-11 16:54) Cor - you didn't tell us if you thought this was a good default; so far Astron agrees, and Tim of course ;-) The Wizard is extremely helpful, when you want to have it. So yes, I support a change in behaviour. Either turning the default off, or the c

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Added line numbers to the basic ide

Hi August, On 17/11/11 16:52, August Sodora wrote: a minor fix ) So, what I suggest is to mail the patch to me/list and I will> test/integrate it ( already I fear some manual merging will be necessary as Everything is pushed to the branch feature/line-numbers-in-basicIDE. I have added a 'Go

[Libreoffice] License statement

Hi fellow hackers, All current and past contributions made to the LibreOffice project are done under the GPLv3 / MPL or later version of these licenses. Until further notice, all future contributions to the LibreOffice project are available under the GPLv3 / MPL or later version of these licenses.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Start Impress without the wizard by default

Hi Cor / Tim, On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 16:37 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > Compared to the current situation, where also File > New > Presentation > start the Wizard. (Whereas both Ctr-N and File > New > Templates and > Documents .. do not use the Wizard.) :-) > We do have " Tools > Options >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Improved Header/Footer UI framerate

Hi Thomas, First - welcome ! :-) it's great to see you here, and thanks for the patch. On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 12:24 +0100, Thomas Collerton wrote: > Hello, here's a small patch which improves the the framerate of the > new Header/Footer UI in Writer. Released under LGPLv3 It look

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [PATCH] Start Impress without the wizard by default

Hi everyone, Hm... Cor was quicker. > We do have " Tools > Options > Impress > General ... > New document .. start > with Wizard " to turn of the wizard all together. > That should do it ..? I agree. This be a vote for not showing the wizard by default, since most/all of the things that can be

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED, partial] Remove NULL checks from delete

On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 12:51 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > > I would rather argue that adding redundant "p = 0;" following a > > "delete p;" makes our code worse, not better (even if that may sound > > paradoxical at first): > > [...] > > I generally agree. Ditto, the code should (ide

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Start Impress without the wizard by default

Michael Meeks wrote (18-11-11 16:15) Hi Tim, On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 15:38 +0100, Tim Hardeck wrote: this one-liner should prevent the Impress Wizard from getting started automatically. The assistant should now only appear if File -> Wizards -> Presentation is used. Compared to the current si

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Start Impress without the wizard by default

Hi Tim, On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 15:38 +0100, Tim Hardeck wrote: > this one-liner should prevent the Impress Wizard from getting started > automatically. The assistant should now only appear if > File -> Wizards -> Presentation is used. This really is going to want UX-advise advice I think :

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: testtools/source

Hi Stephan, On 2011-11-17 at 08:53 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > Revert the component.map removal from makefile to fix Windows build. > > Can somebody with a working Windows build try out whether adding lines > >SHL1IMPLIB = i$(SHL1TARGET) >SHL2IMPLIB = i$(SHL2TARGET) > > wou

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Stephan Bergmann changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||42826 Blocks|42826

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 GerardF changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gerard.farg...@orange.fr Blocks|

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] [PUSHED] Backport reading AES-encrypted ODF 1.2 documents (as genereated by LibO 3.5)

On 11/17/2011 01:41 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Yes, I can do the inclusion into -3-4. AFAIU, Michael Stahl was also just looking at the patch, will wait until he gives a green light, too. Pushed as

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Start Impress without the wizard by default

Hi, this one-liner should prevent the Impress Wizard from getting started automatically. The assistant should now only appear if File -> Wizards -> Presentation is used. Tim -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH/REVIEW-3-4] Backport reading AES-encrypted ODF 1.2 documents (as genereated by LibO 3.5)

On 11/18/2011 02:21 PM, Cor Nouws wrote: So I have to interpret it as: an encrypted document from 3.5 opened in 3.4 will be saved with the old encryption, without notice? Yes. Sorry for my unclear muttering. Stephan ___ LibreOffice mailing list Libr

Re: [Libreoffice] memory leaks found with valgrind

On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 07:33 -0500, Marc-André Laverdière wrote: > I think we should have a tiny script with all those goodies to easily > invoke. Or some alias that gets set in Env.Host.sh Sure - if you linkoo - just source 'ooenv' before running, a make dev-install should do that for you

Re: [Libreoffice] help asked/offered for bug 36555

On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 13:52 +0100, Winfried Donkers wrote: > I have installed all dependancies (I hope) and am now trying to > get ./autogen.sh to succeed (so far, a lot of paths to be set as > option). I keep having trouble with moz/zipped. Should this be (as > seen from within cygwin) /moz/zipp

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH/REVIEW-3-4] Backport reading AES-encrypted ODF 1.2 documents (as genereated by LibO 3.5)

Stephan Bergmann wrote (18-11-11 11:28) On 11/17/2011 10:37 PM, Cor Nouws wrote: Stephan Bergmann wrote (17-11-11 09:02) On 11/11/2011 11:12 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: Is included in the patch, that when a encrypted document is opened in 3.4.n and saved again, people are informed about the change

Re: [Libreoffice] help asked/offered for bug 36555

Hi It should be, from your perspective, /git/lib/moz/zipped For reference, my autogen looks like: --with-max-jobs=6 --with-num-cpus=6 --without-junit --without-java --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/libreoffice/apache-ant-1.8.2 --disable-build-mozilla --disable-atl --disable-activex --with-windows-sdk

Re: [Libreoffice] Build fail in binfilter on Ubuntu 11.10

Le 18/11/2011 12:39, Bjoern Michaelsen a écrit : That did the trick, excellent, thanks !! Alex ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] Unreachable code ?

On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 15:49 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote: > Hi Muthu, > > 18.11.2011 15:38, Muthu Subramanian K пишет: > > That code is inside the constructor. > > and the constructor sets the variable pUndoSet to NULL right on the top. > > So, the if would always fail! Unless I am missing something

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Bug 37361 depends on bug 42178, which changed state. Bug 42178 Summary: CRASH when PRINTING from Page Preview https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42178 What|Old Value |New Value -

Re: [Libreoffice] help asked/offered for bug 36555

>Excellent. Feel free to ask for help if you get stuck setting it up. >-- Noel Grandin I have installed all dependancies (I hope) and am now trying to get ./autogen.sh to succeed (so far, a lot of paths to be set as option). I keep having trouble with moz/zipped. Should this be (as seen from wi

Re: [Libreoffice] Build fail in binfilter on Ubuntu 11.10

Le 18/11/2011 12:39, Bjoern Michaelsen a écrit : Looks like I remembered wrong. Pushed now. :)) Thanks, rebuilding now. Alex ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] ANNOUNCE: Updated schedule for LibreOffice 3.4.5 and 3.5.0 release

Michael Meeks wrote (18-11-11 10:41) This beta0 also has the side-effect of making Cor unbelievably happy - right Cor ? :-) Ah, most appreciated. This just as a quick first reply, since I see my name. Might take some time ( :-\ ) before I can react more in detail. (There is some backl

Re: [Libreoffice] Build fail in binfilter on Ubuntu 11.10

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 01:20:46PM +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Le 18/11/11 13:18, Bjoern Michaelsen a écrit : > However, IIRC that was pushed to master. > > Nope, I'm on master. Looks like I remembered wrong. Pushed now. Best, Bjoern ___ LibreO

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Fix for fdo#42178

Pushed, many thanks for the review! ;) Cheers, Ivan ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] memory leaks found with valgrind

I think we should have a tiny script with all those goodies to easily invoke. Or some alias that gets set in Env.Host.sh What do you think? Marc-André LAVERDIÈRE "Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything." -James 1:4 http://asimplediscipleslif

Re: [Libreoffice] Build fail in binfilter on Ubuntu 11.10

Le 18/11/11 13:18, Bjoern Michaelsen a écrit : Hi Bjoern, > > Looks like: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git;a=blob;f=patches/ubuntufixes-binfilter.diff;h=193fe9f297bdf132b23689eb7baae861b2a8f506;hb=ubuntu-oneiric-3.4 > > is needed. However, IIRC that was pu

Re: [Libreoffice] Build fail in binfilter on Ubuntu 11.10

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 07:16:31PM +, Alex Thurgood wrote: > Making:libbf_wrapperlo.so > ../../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libbf_sdlib.a(sd_sdlib.o): In function > `binfilter::SdDrawDocShell::ClassFactory()': > /home/alex/LODEV/core/clone/binfilter/binfilter/bf_sd/source/ui/app/sd_sdlib.cxx:72: > u

Re: [Libreoffice] Build fail in binfilter on Ubuntu 11.10

Le 18/11/11 12:40, Stephan Bergmann a écrit : Hi Stephan, > On 11/17/2011 08:16 PM, Alex Thurgood wrote: >> If I disable the binfilter compilation, the build completes. This is >> with the latest pulls from master, and even after a make clean. > > But you also pulled the binfilter repo ("./g pul

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED, partial] Remove NULL checks from delete

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:30:41PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 11/10/2011 12:05 AM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: > >I would feel safer if pointers were set to NULL (or nullptr if we > >support C++11) since it is not safe to delete a pointer twice. > > I would rather argue that adding red

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] Unreachable code ?

Hi Muthu, 18.11.2011 15:38, Muthu Subramanian K пишет: That code is inside the constructor. and the constructor sets the variable pUndoSet to NULL right on the top. So, the if would always fail! Unless I am missing something. Looks too trivial to be true ;) I don't see any way to assign non-NU

Re: [Libreoffice] Build fail in binfilter on Ubuntu 11.10

On 11/17/2011 08:16 PM, Alex Thurgood wrote: If I disable the binfilter compilation, the build completes. This is with the latest pulls from master, and even after a make clean. But you also pulled the binfilter repo ("./g pull"), right? Stephan ___

Re: [Libreoffice] Issues important for Japanese users

Hi Fridrich, On Thursday, 2011-11-17 16:49:57 +0100, Fridrich Strba wrote: > - Furigana > Excel has a "Phonetic" function that returns transliteration of kanji > characters into hiragana. Some kanji characters can have ambiguous > transliteration and the default function is returning the mo

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED, partial] Remove NULL checks from delete

On 11/10/2011 12:05 AM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: I would feel safer if pointers were set to NULL (or nullptr if we support C++11) since it is not safe to delete a pointer twice. I would rather argue that adding redundant "p = 0;" following a "delete p;" makes our code worse, not better (

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Improved Header/Footer UI framerate

>From b453cefde0fcc6ec7eb7507fce1f204642c154a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Collerton Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:17:13 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Improved Header/Footer UI framerate --- sw/source/ui/docvw/HeaderFooterWin.cxx |6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) di

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Improved Header/Footer UI framerate

Hello, here's a small patch which improves the the framerate of the new Header/Footer UI in Writer. Released under LGPLv3 From b453cefde0fcc6ec7eb7507fce1f204642c154a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Collerton Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:17:13 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Improved Header/Footer UI f

Re: [Libreoffice] PostgreSQL-SDBC in LO: build system help

On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 00:21 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > Thanks; this being applied, I have pushed to master. Lovely - glad it landed finally. Any chance of mentioning it (and some of the other nice fixes & database bits you've done) in the release notes wiki page at: http:

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] Unreachable code ?

That code is inside the constructor. and the constructor sets the variable pUndoSet to NULL right on the top. So, the if would always fail! Unless I am missing something. Looks too trivial to be true ;) On 11/17/2011 09:48 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Muthu, > > On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 17:34 +0530

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] removing testtool & it's ilk ...

On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 20:44 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Just FYI - at apache someone rewrote testtool as a java component that > could be hooked up to junit Thanks for the pointer :-) Then again graunching the (hard to follow, Java) junit stuff with the (unusable) testtool

Re: [Libreoffice] memory leaks found with valgrind

On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 21:12 -0500, August Sodora wrote: > So hooray we save 160 bytes. Great :-) of course, that is the oosplash wrapper that -should- exit rather sooner than it does IMHO (I still need to look into that for 3.5). The main interest would be in running valgrind on soffice.b

Re: [Libreoffice] report from ODF Plugfest Gouda

Hi Cor, On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 10:00 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > So that was a good opportunity to explain the way we work: do the coding > yourself (and you get lots of great support for that) or make sure that > other developers are interested in it, which can be done in several > ways, of which

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH/REVIEW-3-4] Backport reading AES-encrypted ODF 1.2 documents (as genereated by LibO 3.5)

On 11/17/2011 10:37 PM, Cor Nouws wrote: Stephan Bergmann wrote (17-11-11 09:02) On 11/11/2011 11:12 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: Is included in the patch, that when a encrypted document is opened in 3.4.n and saved again, people are informed about the change in encryption? No. I see. When you mo

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] FDO #40505 - UI: HYPHENATION Right/Left arrow key reversed (keyboard)

On 17/11/11 12:09, Niklas Johansson wrote: Hi, I did a small patch to fix https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40505 The patch fixes the issue with the reversed Right/Left arrow keys without affecting the Right/Left buttons in the dialog. It's a small fix were only to lines of code

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] ReleaseNotes wiki page function

On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 10:06 +0100, Astron wrote: > Great. Clears up some of my own confusion about this feature. (I tried > to reproduce the first one for the handles stuff[1].) Great :-) > [1] Btw, Michael: Not to nag, but do you have any news on the patch I > attached in the handles th

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for fdo#42178

On 17/11/11 20:11, Ivan Timofeev wrote: > 16.11.2011 21:27, Ivan Timofeev пишет: >> Can not reproduce crash with removed lines. > > Oh, what a terrible formulation! I mean, "Can not reproduce crash, even > without the mentioned lines of code." > So, should I commit this removal? hi Ivan, certai

Re: [Libreoffice] ANNOUNCE: Updated schedule for LibreOffice 3.4.5 and 3.5.0 release

On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 20:09 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > there was too big delay before 3.4.5 bugfix release. We decided the > following changes on the last steering call[1]: So the 3.4.x cycle is made slightly odder by us extending it quite a bit, to get it better aligned with the rest of

Re: [Libreoffice] Report from ODF PlugFest

Hi Cor > I spoke with someone from a company that uses LibreOffice in a > document-production server. > First they were glad with the significant improved stability compared > with the old OpenOffice.org (which confirms reports that I got from a > Dutch business partner). Can I get a contact from

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] ReleaseNotes wiki page function

Hi Micheal, Korrawit, >> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/index.php?title=ReleaseNotes/3.5&diff=prev&oldid=34990 >> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/index.php?title=ReleaseNotes/3.5&diff=prev&oldid=34987 >> >>Or just wish-list items ? :-) > > IMHO there are both wish-list. I cannot repr

Re: [Libreoffice] report from ODF Plugfest Gouda

Cor Nouws wrote (18-11-11 10:00) report from first day (=yesterday) Should have included this link: http://plugtest.opendocsociety.org/doku.php?id=plugfests:20_gouda:info And - before I forget it in my next report: kudos for the people organising the event. Great work! -- - Cor - htt

[Libreoffice] report from ODF Plugfest Gouda

Hi all, report from first day (=yesterday) (In the train now on my way for the second one) Two tracks - - - - - - This ODF plugfest is organised roughly in two tracks: - international, where the ODF supporting office programs exchange; - national, where Dutch and Belgium firms that have software

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] memory leaks found with valgrind

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:12:49PM -0500, August Sodora wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:12 PM, August Sodora wrote: >> I was a little curious about valgrind (...) found a few memory >> leaks. >> The first is caused by not calling XFreeGC when the splash screen closes: > From 4e067b1297c7fba

Re: [Libreoffice] PostgreSQL-SDBC in LO: build system help

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 05:36:14PM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >> However, the makefile.mk does not work at all; dmake in that directory >> seems to compute dependencies, but not do anything else. That bug was >> definitely not intro