Re: [Libreoffice] Bug 41883 - MinGW port Most Annoying Bugs

Hi Rainer, Rainer Bielefeld píše v St 19. 10. 2011 v 07:47 +0200: > to keep Bugzilla understandable for non-developers: can someone please > leave a short description on > > what "MinGW" is? Done, please check if it is enough :-) Regards, Kendy

Re: [Libreoffice] Styles cleanup & removing option page std fonts

Hi Cor, On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 18:03 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: > Interest caught by your presentation in Paris, I saw your patch in cgit: >359d0fbd03a68d9131e8fb25e7dac9f19ddf6dcb > > I understand the idea to remove default paragraph styles such as list, > list1, list1 cntd, list2 end etc etc >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Mark ecx register as clobbered (in cpp_uno/gcc3_macosx_intel)

On 10/18/11 11:17 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 10/15/2011 01:25 AM, Kristian Rietveld wrote: Without this patch, Cpp bridgetest on a Clang-compiled UNO runtime will not complete successfully. Btw, pushing some clang-related patches, mainly based on abandoned work I did earlier this year. You

[Libreoffice] Bug 41883 - MinGW port Most Annoying Bugs

Hi, to keep Bugzilla understandable for non-developers: can someone please leave a short description on what "MinGW" is? Thank you Rainer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.or

Re: [Libreoffice] Question about Possible null pointer dereference in SpellDialog.cxx (cui one)

Hi, On Friday, 2011-09-16 16:29:57 -0700, julien2412 wrote: > cppcheck detected this on core/cui/source/dialogs/SpellDialog.cxx > 1534 nullPointer error Possible null pointer dereference: pNewError > 1538 nullPointer error Possible null pointer dereference: pNewError > 1555 nullPoi

[Libreoffice] Allestimenti fieristici ed organizzazione eventi - Exhibit and event organization

Gentile espositore,siamo una ditta specializzata nella realizzazione e noleggio di stand,  personalizzati o pre-allestiti, in Italia e all'estero.Possiamo seguire ed occuparci di tutte le fasi operative, dalla progettazione all'allestimento come: realizzazioni su misuragraficanoleggi (arredi, str

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Mark ecx register as clobbered (in cpp_uno/gcc3_macosx_intel)

On 10/15/2011 01:25 AM, Kristian Rietveld wrote: Without this patch, Cpp bridgetest on a Clang-compiled UNO runtime will not complete successfully. Btw, pushing some clang-related patches, mainly based on abandoned work I did earlier this year. Your go at this gave me fresh enthusiasm. :)

Re: [Libreoffice] Writer : XSLT 2.0 Filters KO in LibreOffice 3.4.3 but OK in 3.3.4

Hi Arnaud, Am 04.10.2011 17:11, schrieb arnaud.mal...@arkarell.com: Hi Michael, Hi Peter, Thanks for your answers. I tried to put the implementation name in the node as specified by Peter, but it doesn't work, my package is not loaded when I put "com.sun.star.comp.JAXTHelper" at that plac

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] patch for fdo38286 EDITING: Crash when inserting a constant in a query

Could someone give his/her opinion about this very small patch on dbaccess part ? The goal is to avoid a crash described on the tracker. Now I don't know if the getChild(0) should be completely removed but, since I'm not an expert, I prefer to let it. Julien. -- View this message in context: htt

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 08:43 -0700, night striker wrote: > Ok, I removed all mentions of adabasui from dbaccess/Module_dbaccess.mk and > from scp2 and I am no longer getting the first error, but I still get Hokay :-) sounds good, I suppose we should remove the code they mention as well

[Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] backport NSS build fixes for 3.4

Hi Michael, On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 17:55 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > i need the following commits to build nss and moz on a linux 3.1 kernel: .. > please somebody tell me that's ok for 3.4. Both look fine to me; ideally I'd have time to sign them off and commit them myself for you :-) [

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] String::CompareIngoreCaseToAscii

Thanks Markus! I've attached a new patch that includes some tests for the BASIC scanner. Most of the test cases are just to get an idea of how the scanner handles certain situations but I tried to make sure I included ones that specifically trigger where the GetBufferAccess was. August Sodora aug

Re: [Libreoffice] Decoupled NSS and Mozilla in the build

On 18.10.2011 12:20, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > After this, I believe the only use of Mozilla (module moz) in our build > is the Mozilla address book. Or do you know of any other use? for other vague memories of moz usage see also: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201109.m

[Libreoffice] Styles cleanup & removing option page std fonts

Hi Cédric, Interest caught by your presentation in Paris, I saw your patch in cgit: 359d0fbd03a68d9131e8fb25e7dac9f19ddf6dcb I understand the idea to remove default paragraph styles such as list, list1, list1 cntd, list2 end etc etc But I do not understand what the link is with removing the o

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] backport NSS build fixes for 3.4

hi all, i need the following commits to build nss and moz on a linux 3.1 kernel: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ab3895465a6cf0a8a41c7432ad9a8f77df7ae572 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=fa70d98e729c0dba44e1c8e25fe1323bad918945 please somebody te

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

Ok, I removed all mentions of adabasui from dbaccess/Module_dbaccess.mk and from scp2 and I am no longer getting the first error, but I still get collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [[...]/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/LinkTarget/Library/libsdbtlo.so] Error 1 Should I find and remove mentio

[Libreoffice] development summary: year 2011, week 40

Hi, this time a brief summary of what happened during the 40th week in 2011 on LibreOffice repositories and the living branches: + master:LO-3.5 development + libreoffice-3-3: fixes for LO-3.3.5 bug fix release + no changes on that branch + li

Re: [Libreoffice] gdb: catching exceptions...

Third time's the charm. Apologies if you've seen this a lot. Mark Wielaard pointed out this note to me. Feel free to CC 'arc...@sourceware.org' on hacks like this, we're interested in hearing about them and to find out what developers need from gdb. Michael> since my smoketest failed again today

Re: [Libreoffice] gdb: info mutex

> "Michael" == Michael Stahl > writes: Michael> have just found a great python command for GDB by Tom Tromey called Michael> "info mutex": Michael> http://www.cygwin.com/ml/archer/2010-q3/msg00024.html Michael> looks very helpful for debugging a deadlock: Just be warned, it is a bit bro

Re: [Libreoffice] Decoupled NSS and Mozilla in the build

Hi Caolan, On 2011-10-18 at 11:29 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > After this, I believe the only use of Mozilla (module moz) in our build > > is the Mozilla address book. Or do you know of any other use? > > There is also some ldap stuff built by default around the moz chain, > though there i

[Libreoffice] recent push requires ~fresh rebuild

"Undo basis/brand split: move program/classes/ from basis to brand." requires manual tweaking in a rebuild, as it changes content of generated .component files based on changes in the central makef

[Libreoffice] gdb: info mutex

have just found a great python command for GDB by Tom Tromey called "info mutex": http://www.cygwin.com/ml/archer/2010-q3/msg00024.html looks very helpful for debugging a deadlock: (gdb) info mutex Mutex 0x264fbb0: * Owned by thread 25481 Thread 27391 Mutex 0xbd4370: Owned by thread

Re: [Libreoffice] gdb: catching exceptions...

On 18/10/11 12:21, Lubos Lunak wrote: On Monday 17 of October 2011, Michael Stahl wrote: since my smoketest failed again today, i've distracted myself a bit with GDB Python scripting, the result of which is a command that can break when an exception is thrown, but only if a certain function (whi

Re: [Libreoffice] Decoupled NSS and Mozilla in the build

On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 12:20 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > After this, I believe the only use of Mozilla (module moz) in our build > is the Mozilla address book. Or do you know of any other use? There is also some ldap stuff built by default around the moz chain, though there is an alternative op

[Libreoffice] [PUSHING] ... pre patch question

Hi Lior, First - great to see you in Paris :-) thanks for sitting down to review this stuff together. On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 20:53 +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote: > I'm attaching 3 patches: > 1. Bulk removal. > 2. Compact the enumeration. > 3. Just align a string (no change in content).

Re: [Libreoffice] gdb: catching exceptions...

On Monday 17 of October 2011, Michael Stahl wrote: > since my smoketest failed again today, i've distracted myself a bit with > GDB Python scripting, the result of which is a command that can break > when an exception is thrown, but only if a certain function (which is > given as parameter) is on t

[Libreoffice] Decoupled NSS and Mozilla in the build

Hi, Markus found out that when you provide --disable-mozilla, you lose the xml security features provided by NSS. After: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=d37209912b44f5accee73e7f774122b195fe2183 it shouldn't be the case any more. NSS is not built in the moz module for qu

Re: [Libreoffice] Trying to diagnose base running extremely slowly

On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 09:03 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > the strace output, and see if the reason for hang in > java.net.PlainSocketimpl.socketAccept is actually something that can be > worked around. Of course, it is possible that Java7 adds some security features around accepting sock

Re: [Libreoffice] make check fails in i18npool

Hi Regina, On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 18:10 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: > I think, that my last working build has at last commit > e024f616934bb78fba8c8101264806d507068d7e > Author: Christoph Lutz > Date: Tue Sep 6 19:01:19 2011 +0200 > i#118224: kill O(n^2) complexity of unique bookmark nam

Re: [Libreoffice] Trying to diagnose base running extremely slowly

Hi John, On 2011-10-18 at 06:18 +0100, jowyta wrote: > >> Also, I see Ocke Janssen wrote in > >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117203 [...] > I have done some searching and the bug appears to be filed as: > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7024514 > So provided