Re: [Libreoffice] MinGW cross-compilation: Runs!

On 09/29/2011 11:18 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Based on Tor's, Fridrich's, and others great work, I was able to get the MinGW cross-compilation to state that it not only builds, but even runs! :-) The good thing about all this is that with this, you do not need a Windows machine at all to be able

Re: [Libreoffice] 14 files in libreoffice git source flagged as trojans

On 09/29/2011 10:52 PM, Billy Charlton wrote: After the clone completed, MS Security Essentials popped up with nine "severe" trojans and exploits. The affected files are .doc, .rtf, and .wmf -- which would be the places that Windows viruses and trojans would indeed hide. I have no way of knowing

Re: [Libreoffice] MinGW cross-compilation: Runs!

Olivier Hallot wrote (30-09-11 01:09) These are great news indeed! Congratulations to all the team! +1 -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listin

Re: [Libreoffice] IAccessible2 - Windows (from libreoffice-accessibility)

Am 27.09.2011 17:51, schrieb Christophe Strobbe: > Hi Michael, > > At 16:41 27-9-2011, Michael Meeks wrote: >>Hi Christophe, >> >> Thanks for forwarding this. >> >>On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:50 +0200, Christophe Strobbe wrote: >> > It appears that the code is still only available in CWSes:

Re: [Libreoffice] #ifdef ALPHA for DEC Alpha?

> Should it be fixed or just removed? Removed. As lovely and before its time as the Alpha architecture was, by now it is irrelevant for LibreOffice. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailma

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for bug fdo#41310 - Need more room for localized string

Hi here is the patch for bug fdo#41310 - Need more room for localized string. I resized the dialog box 30 units to the right, and the objects were ajusted accordingly. I have measured for a fontsize of 10. I have no Windows nor Mac box to test the patch. Regards -- Olivier Hallot Founder and S

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] backport poppler-0.17/poppler-glib fixes to the 3.4 branch

Hi, On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:30:57PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > Why do we bother to check for that header in configure ? is it not > guarenteed to be there for older poppler versions ? if so it'd be better As said in other replies, it's in libpoppler-cpp-dev in Debian so not there when

Re: [Libreoffice] Developer resources

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 02:16:39AM +0530, Shoubhik Bose wrote: > I wish to work on extensions. I'm looking for some tutorials/code > samples/API references. > > Could you please provide me some links? If you're willing to do it in Java with Eclipse, a tutorial: http://wiki.services.openoffice.

Re: [Libreoffice] MinGW cross-compilation: Runs!

Hello Kendy These are great news indeed! Congratulations to all the team! Olivier Em 29-09-2011 18:18, Jan Holesovsky escreveu: Hi all, Based on Tor's, Fridrich's, and others great work, I was able to get the MinGW cross-compilation to state that it not only builds, but even runs! :-) The go

[Libreoffice] #ifdef ALPHA for DEC Alpha?

Hi, I stumbled on some ifdefs of ALPHA existing as follows: > sfx2/inc/sfx2/minarray.hxx:#if defined (ALPHA) && defined (UNX) > svtools/source/filter/filter.cxx:#if defined UNX && defined ALPHA > sw/source/core/docnode/ndsect.cxx:#if defined( ALPHA ) && defined( UNX ) > sw/source/core/docnode/node

[Libreoffice] MinGW cross-compilation: Runs!

Hi all, Based on Tor's, Fridrich's, and others great work, I was able to get the MinGW cross-compilation to state that it not only builds, but even runs! :-) The good thing about all this is that with this, you do not need a Windows machine at all to be able to produce LibreOffice Windows executa

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] backport poppler-0.17/poppler-glib fixes to the 3.4 branch

Hi, On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 05:02:00PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 16:30 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > > Why do we bother to check for that header in configure ? is it not > > guarenteed to be there for older poppler versions ? > > Debian splits their poppler package

[Libreoffice] 14 files in libreoffice git source flagged as trojans

Hello LibreOffice devs, I just did my first git clone of the core libreoffice codebase, hoping to poke around to see if I could start helping out with some bugfixing. After the clone completed, MS Security Essentials popped up with nine "severe" trojans and exploits. The affected files are .doc,

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Mihkel Tõnnov changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||34548 --- Comment #214 from Mihkel Tõnno

[Libreoffice] Developer resources

I wish to work on extensions. I'm looking for some tutorials/code samples/API references. Could you please provide me some links? -- Thanks and Regards, Shoubhik Bose IF I REST, I SHALL RUST.. SO, LETS SHARE THE KNOWLEDGE ! ___ LibreOffice mailing l

Re: [Libreoffice] [RFC] npapi-sdk instead of xulrunner

Hi, On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 07:05:45PM +0300, Jani Monoses wrote: > plugin. They may as well be shipped inside LibO and not bother with > external deps for this - it would mean adding another > build/configure test for npapi-sdk along with the ones looked for > now. > The NPAPI API is stable so an

Re: [Libreoffice] Build Error - Graphite2-1.0.3

Dnia 2011-09-29, czw o godzinie 10:29 +0200, Maciej Rumianowski pisze: > Hi, > > I have encountered an error while building latest source. > > > > = > > (1/1) Building module graphite > > = > > Entering /home/maciej/Dokumenty/LibreOffice-Dev/master/graphite > > > > Compi

Re: [Libreoffice] IAccessible2 - Windows (from libreoffice-accessibility)

Am 27.09.2011 17:14, schrieb Fridrich Strba: > On 27/09/11 16:41, Michael Meeks wrote: >> It is very useful for archiving & understanding on the off chance that >> IBM don't meet their commitment to do the right thing and get this into >> Apache in a form that we can easily consume. > > At O

[Libreoffice] [FIXED] Re: Questions about Easyhack 37007 Add Math symbol "There does not exist"

Hello, Just to tell that this fdo is fixed now ((c) + version changed now) and to thank Caolán and Andras for their support. I closed the tracker too. Julien. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Questions-about-Easyhack-37007-Add-Math-symbol-There-does-not-exis

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #213 from dle...@free.fr 2011-09-29 10:28:22 PDT --- Proposing bug 39928 - VIEWING: pictures in particular .doc shown wrong, picture size correct, but contents shrunken and surrounded by white margin Because it is a regression over L

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#40373 - export xhtml parse error

Hi Michael, Michael Meeks schrieb: Hi Regina, On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 15:50 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: The patch fixes the following error: When you export a document via File->Export->XHTML it generates an invalid file, because the lang attribute gets a wrong namespace. Nice patch

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #212 from LE GARREC Vincent 2011-09-29 09:57:33 PDT --- (In reply to comment #211) > LE GARREC Vincent - it is normal for someone else to add a 'most annoying' bug > as a dependency after triage, just suggest things in the comments.

Re: [Libreoffice] LO Custom properties

On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 05:35 +, swagat sharma wrote: > Hi, > > I have created a .deb package of LO using epm. > i have a 64-bit ubuntu machine. > And the package generated is x86_64. > > I have to install it using --force-architecture option. I dont want > that. > > Q1) How can I generate 32-

Re: [Libreoffice] [RFC] npapi-sdk instead of xulrunner

On 09/29/2011 06:01 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: Hi, I was noticed that there is package called npapi-sdk [1] that can be used as firefox/mozilla headers instead of requiring whole beast to build the plugins. Do you think it would be possible to use this in libreoffice, or is it impossible? I don't

[Libreoffice] ODBC handles, a quibble

Silly me! While reading some of the LibreOffice code for ODBC connections, I started to look at ... ISO/IEC FCD 9075-3:2006(E) Title: Information technology - Database Languages - SQL - Part 3: Call-Level Interface (SQL/CLI)

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] backport poppler-0.17/poppler-glib fixes to the 3.4 branch

On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 16:30 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > Why do we bother to check for that header in configure ? is it not > guarenteed to be there for older poppler versions ? Debian splits their poppler packages into "poppler" "poppler-cpp" and "poppler-glib" I believe, and the cpp/* hea

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #211 from Michael Meeks 2011-09-29 08:58:37 PDT --- LE GARREC Vincent - it is normal for someone else to add a 'most annoying' bug as a dependency after triage, just suggest things in the comments. Also - wrt. most annoyingness, a bu

[Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] backport poppler-0.17/poppler-glib fixes to the 3.4 branch

Hi Tomas, On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 16:14 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > I need these two patches in the 3.4 branch so I don't have to patch it > on distro side, they just add ifdefs to make the thing work on the > newest poppler. They look good to me. Is there any chance we can update our int

[Libreoffice] [RFC] npapi-sdk instead of xulrunner

Hi, I was noticed that there is package called npapi-sdk [1] that can be used as firefox/mozilla headers instead of requiring whole beast to build the plugins. Do you think it would be possible to use this in libreoffice, or is it impossible? I don't understand the nsplugin part much, and it was

[Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...

Present: + Norbert, Thorsten, Michael, Stephan, Andras, David, Rainer, Mitch, Bjoern, Caolan + Completed Action Items + spec. for beefier gerrit machine -> sysadmin team (Bjoern) + Pending Action Items + default to TM safe (non-TDF) branding (Thorsten) +

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] backport poppler-0.17/poppler-glib fixes to the 3.4 branch

Hi, I need these two patches in the 3.4 branch so I don't have to patch it on distro side, they just add ifdefs to make the thing work on the newest poppler. This saves me from keeping them in our vcs as patches agains 3.4 series. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=91313fc05a

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild question

Hi Peter On 25 September 2011 01:05, Peter Foley wrote: > While working on converting xmerge to gbuild I found that the current > gbuild Jar.mk doesn't support adding non java files to the jar. > The xmerge jars need a component.xml file included in the jar. > I tried to implement file adding but

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch][PUSHED] Porting js2hxx.py to python3

Done then ! Thanks for the merge btw :) On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen > wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:14 AM, David Tardon wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 05:02:29PM +0200, Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen wrote: >>>

Re: [Libreoffice] Language selection

On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 10:56 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 17:09 -0500, Arno Teigseth wrote: > > I have installed just a few languages, but still "all the wrong" > > languages show up. > > As far as I recall, those langauges are from the language guessing > feature, and hope

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch][PUSHED] Porting js2hxx.py to python3

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:14 AM, David Tardon wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 05:02:29PM +0200, Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This is a simple patch to allow using python 3 when building. >>> I'm new to this list, and

Re: [Libreoffice] need help with feature/gbuild

> Not only Linux, but also at least Mac OS X and Solaris use this naming > scheme of a suffixed ".3". Also in a cross-compiled Windows build is a "3" used, although there the "3" goes into the basename, uno_sal3.dll. (Note that this is different from what a native MSVC build produces, sal3.dll. Th

Re: [Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:57 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 01:49 -0700, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org > wrote: >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 >> >> --- Comment #209 from Alex Thurgood 2011-09-29 >> 01:49:55 PDT --- >> Nominating 41022 as blocker. > >

[Libreoffice] GPS全球卫星定位，来试试吧~(AD)libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org

　 网络版GPS全球定位上线了~ 精准定位全球手机位置，只要输入手机号，就可以精准定位所在位置 卫星地图精准显示，误差30米 我也来试试，定位一下~ 　 　 　 　 　 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] need help with feature/gbuild

On 09/29/2011 01:04 AM, Matúš Kukan wrote: I have recreated feature/gbuild branch. I'm gbuildizing sal, salhelper, cppu and cppuhelper there. It's almost done but there are few problems. In odk I'm getting: check cpp docu: + ERROR:

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#40373 - export xhtml parse error

Hi, At 11:13 29-9-2011, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Regina, On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 15:50 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: > The patch fixes the following error: > When you export a document via File->Export->XHTML it generates an > invalid file, because the lang attribute gets a wrong namespace.

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch][PUSHED] Porting js2hxx.py to python3

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:14 AM, David Tardon wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 05:02:29PM +0200, Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This is a simple patch to allow using python 3 when building. >> I'm new to this list, and to submitting patches for libreoffice, so if >> I did anything wrong,

Re: [Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

Le 29/09/11 10:57, Caolán McNamara a écrit : >> >> --- Comment #209 from Alex Thurgood 2011-09-29 >> 01:49:55 PDT --- >> Nominating 41022 as blocker. > > Obviously can't be a release "blocker", 3.4 is already released :-) > Damn !!! How'd that happen, LOL :-)) Alex

Re: [Libreoffice] bug in GCC 4.6.1?

At 4:14pm -0400 Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Julien Nabet wrote: I just found this gcc bugtracker : http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383 But it's about GCC 4.7. Ah, shame on me. First hit on Google. GCC 4.7 still shares plenty of code (and this included) with 4.6+, so that's good enough fo

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#40373 - export xhtml parse error

Hi Regina, On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 15:50 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: > The patch fixes the following error: > When you export a document via File->Export->XHTML it generates an > invalid file, because the lang attribute gets a wrong namespace. Nice patch to fix it :-) I assume you have c

Re: [Libreoffice] unit-test / code sharing ...

On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 11:47 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > I suspect we should do this for all unit-tests above tools, and the > > head-less smoketest too. > > But isn't it the way that all dialogs are implicitly cancelled in > headless mode, anyway? Oh - quite possibly for head

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Replace-SvULongs-with-std-vector-in-sfx2

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:33:50AM +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote: > Hi David, > > > @@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ TYPEINIT1_FACTORY( SvxClipboardFmtItem, SfxPoolItem , > > > new SvxClipboardFmtItem(0 > > > SvxClipboardFmtItem_Impl::SvxClipboardFmtItem_Impl( > > > const SvxClip

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #210 from Alex Thurgood 2011-09-29 01:57:26 PDT --- (In reply to comment #209) > Nominating 41022 as blocker. Nasty crash in database form edit mode when using > automatic field order activation function. It is also a regression ove

Re: [Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 01:49 -0700, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 > > --- Comment #209 from Alex Thurgood 2011-09-29 > 01:49:55 PDT --- > Nominating 41022 as blocker. Obviously can't be a release "blocker", 3.4 is already released :-)

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #209 from Alex Thurgood 2011-09-29 01:49:55 PDT --- Nominating 41022 as blocker. Nasty crash in database form edit mode when using automatic field order activation function. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userpr

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Alex Thurgood changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||41022 -- Configure bugmail: https://bug

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Replace-SvULongs-with-std-vector-in-sfx2

Hi David, > > @@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ TYPEINIT1_FACTORY( SvxClipboardFmtItem, SfxPoolItem , new > > SvxClipboardFmtItem(0 > > SvxClipboardFmtItem_Impl::SvxClipboardFmtItem_Impl( > > const SvxClipboardFmtItem_Impl& rCpy ) > > { > > -aFmtIds.Insert( &rCpy.aFmtIds, 0 );

Re: [Libreoffice] Android cross-building state

Hi there, On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 17:40 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > thanks to Tor's and others (Kendy, Fridrich, Jesus and all those I > forgot) work around making LibO truly cross-buildable, there's now > Android building up to instsetoo_native again. Awesome - so the GUI bit comes ne

[Libreoffice] Build Error - Graphite2-1.0.3

Hi, I have encountered an error while building latest source. > = > (1/1) Building module graphite > = > Entering /home/maciej/Dokumenty/LibreOffice-Dev/master/graphite > > Compiling: > libgraphite2_off/unxlngi6.pro/misc/build/graphite2-1.0.3/src/direct_machine.cpp > Co

Re: [Libreoffice] New Config Variable in Impress

On 09/28/2011 11:00 PM, Rob Snelders wrote: I'm looking into bug fdo#35973. But I have trouble finding out how I can add config-variables for Impress. Can anybody give me any pointers? The configuration data is in module officecfg. There you have schema (.xcs) files describing the static layo

Re: [Libreoffice] unit tests run on top-level make ?

On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 08:07 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Norbert Thiebaud > > the target 'all' was not the first target anymore but 'build' was > > so make was doing make build instead of make all > > Sorry for that -- I was so used to have .DEFAULTGOAL set explicitly > from gbuild, that I