Re: [Libreoffice] Some bugtracker cleaning ?

Thank you for the tip Norbert, the message has been sent to the QA list + Rainer. Julien. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Some-bugtracker-cleaning-tp3374105p3375141.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

Re: [Libreoffice] LO Custom properties

Hi, I have created a .deb package of LO using epm. i have a 64-bit ubuntu machine. And the package generated is x86_64. I have to install it using --force-architecture option. I dont want that. Q1) How can I generate 32-bit package using epm? Q2) Is the build we make machine specific? Like if I'

Re: [Libreoffice] Option convert-to

Cor Nouws wrote (28-09-11 06:45) For (all kind of) user questions, please see the Support tab on the website. Having connection with the website right now: http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/ -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org ___ LibreOffic

Re: [Libreoffice] Option convert-to

Hi Arianne, Arianne Valdes Alvarez wrote (28-09-11 03:53) I'm studying how to convert an csv file to ods file. [...] This list is for developer issues. See. http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice For (all kind of) user questions, please see the Support tab on the website.

[Libreoffice] Option convert-to

I'm studying ho w to convert a n csv file to ods file. I'm using, for exaple, the comand line: libreoffice --headless --convert-to ods --outdir /home/user/Desktop/ /home/user/Desktop/example.cvs But, I need to know if there are any possibility that I could specify an columns separator like a

Re: [Libreoffice] subsequenttest hang ...

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 26.09.2011 20:46, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >> >> Tinderboxes need to handle non-terminating builds, anyway (think a >> non-terminating, say, idlc), so no need to address non-terminating tests >> specifically for them. > > or, for a more rea

Re: [Libreoffice] Some bugtracker cleaning ?

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:03 PM, julien2412 wrote: > Hello, > > I'm taking a look at the bugtracker, base part. I stopped on the 36356. > Since nobody reproduced it and the one who submited the bug said it was ok > with the new version, could I simply close it (with of course a comment > which exp

Re: [Libreoffice] --enable-werror

On 27.09.2011 10:33, Michael Meeks wrote: > Sure sure, so - I think Stephan has a point - that we ought to find > some way of enabling this for some set of people that can cope with it. > I suspect a good heuristic would be to have an 'auto' mode for the flag > that checks if you have git pus

Re: [Libreoffice] clean rebuilds needed

On 26.09.2011 22:27, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 09/26/2011 10:01 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: >> No need for such theory, as for all practical proposes, there is ccache >> doing exactly that (although with a bit of addition IO). As for finer >> granularity: With the practical reality of C/C++ wi

Re: [Libreoffice] subsequenttest hang ...

On 26.09.2011 20:46, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > Tinderboxes need to handle non-terminating builds, anyway (think a > non-terminating, say, idlc), so no need to address non-terminating tests > specifically for them. or, for a more realistic example, a non-terminating autodoc :-P __

Re: [Libreoffice] Easy Hack String replacement: OUString to String

On 28.09.2011 00:02, Neil Leathers wrote: > I need to know how the correct way to convert from OUString to String. > I know this is a not desired but in order to roll in the changes > gradually it is necessary to do conversion back to deal with areas that > haven't been move to the new string class

[Libreoffice] Some bugtracker cleaning ?

Hello, I'm taking a look at the bugtracker, base part. I stopped on the 36356. Since nobody reproduced it and the one who submited the bug said it was ok with the new version, could I simply close it (with of course a comment which explains why) ? Julien -- View this message in context: http://

[Libreoffice] Easy Hack String replacement: OUString to String

I need to know how the correct way to convert from OUString to String. I know this is a not desired but in order to roll in the changes gradually it is necessary to do conversion back to deal with areas that haven't been move to the new string classes. Neil Leathers

Re: [Libreoffice] Easy Hack String replacement: SearchAndReplace

> On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 09:43 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > On 09/26/2011 01:30 AM, Neil Leathers wrote: > I was looking into the > > Easy Hacks: "Removal/Replacement of the String/UniString/ByteString > > with OUString/OString once and for all" and ran into needing to > > translate a Searc

Re: [Libreoffice] Removal of rtl::O[U]String[Buffer]::operator sal_{char|Unicode} const *()

On 09/27/2011 09:21 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: (Note that my commits just broke various tinderboxes due to some GCCs apparently complaining about alleged ambiguities in a+=b when a is a tools String and b an rtl::OUString; fixing it right now.) Hopefully fixed now with

[Libreoffice] How Diagram.oxt should be retrieved ?

Hello, By doing make dev-install, I've got these errors : ERROR: The following files could not be found: ERROR: File not found: Diagram.oxt ERROR: File not found: lightproof-en-US.oxt I already talked about lightproof but I had never had a pb with Diagram.oxt and this one has been here since the

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #207 from Francisco 2011-09-27 14:13:13 PDT --- I would wish to add 39052, which is a basic funcionality that doesn't work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this m

Re: [Libreoffice] Pb with lightproof

Kálmán, Since for the moment, it's impossible to use "make dev-install" with lightroom enabled and nobody seems to be against it, go ahead for the patch. If there's a pb, it could easily be reverted. Julien. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Pb-with-lightproo

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #206 from Francisco 2011-09-27 13:41:54 PDT --- I would wish to add 39052, which is a basic funcionality that doesn't work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this m

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Replace-SvULongs-with-std-vector-in-sfx2

Hi *, Simple Patch replacing SvULongs with std::vector. Related Bug 38831. Cheers, Maciej >From 6e3f88f2673c507ce2f3d9ab4bdc92c8be75bd0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maciej Rumianowski Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:04:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Replace SvULongs with std::vector in sfx2 Bug 38831,

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Re: Replace SvULongs and SvUShorts in svx with std::vector

Marking as PATCH. Might got lost. Cheers Maciej ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Removal of rtl::O[U]String[Buffer]::operator sal_{char|Unicode} const *()

On 09/27/2011 09:07 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 21:00 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: introduce the operator [] replacements. Any reason, we make operator[] const ?, i.e. unassignable. plenty of code out there using operator[] to get a given index, and setCharAt to set it,

Re: [Libreoffice] Removal of rtl::O[U]String[Buffer]::operator sal_{char|Unicode} const *()

On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 21:00 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > introduce the operator [] replacements. Any reason, we make operator[] const ?, i.e. unassignable. plenty of code out there using operator[] to get a given index, and setCharAt to set it, which is kind of clumsy. C. ___

[Libreoffice] Removal of rtl::O[U]String[Buffer]::operator sal_{char|Unicode} const *()

Hi all, As has recently been discussed on #libreoffice-dev, its probably a good idea to remove the rather unhelpful conversion operators rtl::OString::operator sal_Char const * () rtl::OStringBuffer::operator sal_Char const * () rtl::OUString::operator sal_Unicode const * () rtl::OUStr

[Libreoffice] License for my contributions

Hi, A quick mail to confirm that all my future contributions will be under MPL/LGPLv3+. Lucas ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] IAccessible2 - Windows (from libreoffice-accessibility)

Hi Christophe & Fridrich, On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 17:51 +0200, Christophe Strobbe wrote: > My understanding was that IBM donated IAccessible2 code based on an > OpenOffice.org version that was outdated by the time of their .. > As far as I know, what IBM has done & working in-house and promised >

Re: [Libreoffice] windows build fix

On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:41:07 +0100 Caolán McNamara wrote: > Seem to have a problem with 096397e9da806aef68812c40ddc02075c296ba72 > and getting the right paths. > > The attached, for msvc anyway, seems to work ? That looks a bit odd to me: gb_LinkTarget_add_nativeres should take a LinkTarget na

Re: [Libreoffice] IAccessible2 - Windows (from libreoffice-accessibility)

Hi Michael, At 16:41 27-9-2011, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Christophe, Thanks for forwarding this. On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:50 +0200, Christophe Strobbe wrote: > It appears that the code is still only available in CWSes: > . Malte Timmermann's message >

[Libreoffice] windows build fix

Seem to have a problem with 096397e9da806aef68812c40ddc02075c296ba72 and getting the right paths. The attached, for msvc anyway, seems to work ? C. diff --git a/solenv/gbuild/platform/windows.mk b/solenv/gbuild/platform/windows.mk index e91d5b0..d1fef39 100644 --- a/solenv/gbuild/platform/window

Re: [Libreoffice] IAccessible2 - Windows (from libreoffice-accessibility)

On 27/09/11 16:41, Michael Meeks wrote: > It is very useful for archiving & understanding on the off chance that > IBM don't meet their commitment to do the right thing and get this into > Apache in a form that we can easily consume. At ODF PlugFest in Berlin this July, IBM's Rob Weir announ

Re: [Libreoffice] --enable-werror

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 09/27/2011 10:33 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: > > No need to go creative here, IMO.  With a default --disable-werror, I *hope* > it should suffice to just remind developers that they should --enable-werror > (the same way we should remind t

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW 3.4] fdo#35728 forms.OGridControlModel segfault

On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:54:44 +0100 Michael Meeks wrote: > --- a/svx/inc/svx/gridctrl.hxx > +++ b/svx/inc/svx/gridctrl.hxx > @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ public: > virtual void columnChanged() = 0; > }; > > -#define GRID_COLUMN_NOT_FOUND ((sal_uInt16)-1) > +#define GRID_COLUMN_NOT_FOUND SAL_MAX

Re: [Libreoffice] IAccessible2 - Windows (from libreoffice-accessibility)

Hi Christophe, Thanks for forwarding this. On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:50 +0200, Christophe Strobbe wrote: > It appears that the code is still only available in CWSes: > . Malte Timmermann's message > describes in what order the code from the CWSes was m

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Patch for importing hyperliks from .doc files

Hello, Here is the LibreOffice bug report: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41255 I did not check if the patch was applied in latest LibreOffice git repository. If it is, I can just close the bug. Thank you for all the help :) Best regards Knut Olav Bøhmer 2011/9/8 Harald Kagerer :

[Libreoffice] Diploma thesis: a survey about OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice

Hi, yesterday we received a request for participation in a survey at the German LibreOffice list. As the survey's target is the LibO/OOo community in general, I'm forwarding this to the related lists. I'd be happy to see many community members participating (but please don't crash the survey ser

Re: [Libreoffice] --enable-werror

On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 14:21 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > I wasn't aware that this might come across negatively, arrogantly, Hey - sorry for rather an over-sharp response too; you weren't to know that we as a team hadn't even discussed asking this of all developers yet AFAIR.

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED, partial][PATCH] Refactoring for WMF Loading

On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 16:36 +0530, Marc-André Laverdière wrote: > Hello everybody. > > Here is a patch from the "I have no idea what I'm doing" department. 0001 looks good to me anyway, pushed now, sorry for the delay. 0002 looks a bit more dubious, broad stroke fine, but isn't it the case that.

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW 3.4] fdo#35728 forms.OGridControlModel segfault

On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 13:58 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > I found another patch that fell though the cracks: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=a8d1349bf5d84fc7170a80813d4edcf562184d48 Looks good to me too, but it seems we have something like this in 3-4 anyway:

Re: [Libreoffice] cppunittester hang when LC_ALL/LANG set

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:15:17AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > >> ^ This hangs, but after an 'unset LANG LC_ALL' the build continues fine. > > > > Yes, I can reproduce this here -- will provide a fix. Sorry for the > > trouble. > >

Re: [Libreoffice] --enable-werror

On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 12:21 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > > and it seems unclear what the benefit vs. the pain pwrt. > > when re-synching (around deleting old remote branches etc.) would be. > > Given enough eyeballs all bugs are shallow. Having commits visible > some time before they hit mas

Re: [Libreoffice] --enable-werror

On 09/26/2011 08:41 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Just a friendly reminder that all developers should use --enable-werror all the time. I wasn't aware that this might come across negatively, arrogantly, dictatorial, or something like that. Hope I didn't put off too many people. I had sincerel

Re: [Libreoffice] True Trojans or false positives ?

Thank you for your fast replies, I was not that affraid, being confident in LibO, but I prefered to tell it, for safety reasons. Here is the content of the Symantec quarantine : Bloodhound. Exploit. 359CVE-2009-3302-2.doc Troian HorseCVE-2008-2752-3.doc Trojan HorseCVE-2008-2752-2

Re: [Libreoffice] per-library types headers ...

On 09/27/2011 10:55 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: I'm still a tad annoyed by our compile times, and was wondering - has a footypes.hxx header approach been tried in the past. This would add a near complete set of forward declarations of classes, templates, etc. necessary to use that library.

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW 3.4] fdo#35728 forms.OGridControlModel segfault

Hi all, I found another patch that fell though the cracks: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=a8d1349bf5d84fc7170a80813d4edcf562184d48 fixes a forms crasher. Best, Bjoern -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen ___ LibreO

Re: [Libreoffice] per-library types headers ...

On 09/27/2011 01:24 PM, Noel Grandin wrote: (1) Nice pragma trick for making this problem show up at compile time: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/74326/how-should-i-detect-unnecessary-include-files-in-a-large-c-project/109890#109890 This would flag double includes that are there for good en

Re: [Libreoffice] anyone else having trouble pulling from git under windows?

Cool! Thanks! Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:19:58 +0200 > Noel Grandin wrote: > >> Thanks. >> git-gc and git-fsck didn't help, so I'm going to blow everything away >> and download again overnight. > Try to use: http://dev-www.libreoffice.org/bundles/libo_git_from_tar.sh > > i

Re: [Libreoffice] anyone else having trouble pulling from git under windows?

On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:19:58 +0200 Noel Grandin wrote: > Thanks. > git-gc and git-fsck didn't help, so I'm going to blow everything away > and download again overnight. Try to use: http://dev-www.libreoffice.org/bundles/libo_git_from_tar.sh it should be a lot faster. Best, Bjoern -- https

Re: [Libreoffice] per-library types headers ...

Did some quick research on this topic: (1) Nice pragma trick for making this problem show up at compile time: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/74326/how-should-i-detect-unnecessary-include-files-in-a-large-c-project/109890#109890 (2) There is a tool based on clang that can detect unused include

Re: [Libreoffice] anyone else having trouble pulling from git under windows?

Thanks. git-gc and git-fsck didn't help, so I'm going to blow everything away and download again overnight. -- Noel G Tor Lillqvist wrote: > Works normally for me. > > --tml > Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html ___ LibreOffice mailin

Re: [Libreoffice] True Trojans or false positives ?

Hi there, On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 03:45 -0700, dionysien wrote: > For the first time I just downloaded a part of LibO source, > libreoffice-writer-3.4.3.2.tar.bz2, Heh :-) > From the .bz2 file I extracted the .tar one, and from the latter I extracted > the directories and files.

Re: [Libreoffice] True Trojans or false positives ?

dionysien wrote: > Immediately 'Autoprotect' (from Symantec, on win XP) claimed to detect and > move to quarantine a series of Trojans (7) plus 'Bloodhound.Exploit.108' > plus 'Bloodhound.Exploit.359', all allegedly from directory > Hi Jean-François, those are harmless test files from the Writer

[Libreoffice] True Trojans or false positives ?

Hi, For the first time I just downloaded a part of LibO source, libreoffice-writer-3.4.3.2.tar.bz2, From the .bz2 file I extracted the .tar one, and from the latter I extracted the directories and files. Immediately 'Autoprotect' (from Symantec, on win XP) claimed to detect and move to quarantine

Re: [Libreoffice] Short bios for LiboCon Com

Hi all, Seems my TDF address is bouncing (thanks Andras) so sending it to my gmail address is ok. Thanks in advance Kind regards Sophie On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Sophie Gautier wrote: > Hi all, > > For our press agency organizing the LibOCon communication, I need a > short bio (3/4 lines

Re: [Libreoffice] --enable-werror

On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:24:12 +0100 Michael Meeks wrote: > and it seems unclear what the benefit vs. the pain pwrt. > when re-synching (around deleting old remote branches etc.) would be. Given enough eyeballs all bugs are shallow. Having commits visible some time before they hit master might pre

Re: [Libreoffice] per-library types headers ...

Hi Noel, On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 11:03 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote: > Some compilers can pull header-parse-caching tricks, but in order for > that to work nicely Sure - we have lots of (IIRC unused) precompiled_ header stuff - that of course tends to work in the opposite direction: include as

Re: [Libreoffice] anyone else having trouble pulling from git under windows?

Works normally for me. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] Short bios for LiboCon Com

Hi all, For our press agency organizing the LibOCon communication, I need a short bio (3/4 lines) of the developers doing a conf or a talk or anything else. Humor is welcome, and of course it will be publicly published so you have to agree on this too. Thanks a lot in advance. Ah and the sooner t

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Libreoffice 3.4 crash on screen resize (lp#852819)

On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:41:09 +0100 Michael Meeks wrote: > No that's fine - until 3.4.next goes post RC1, having said > that it gets my thumbs up too :-) > > Nice catch ! Pushed as: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4&id=b3d61e7991192986dcd71

Re: [Libreoffice] --enable-werror

Hi Bjoern, On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 19:47 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > This seems to me to be a bit overzealous. Invoking the impression that > development on branches is oldschool and obsolete is just wrong -- There is no problem with working on branches, indeed - I'm actively working

Re: [Libreoffice] subsequenttest hang ...

On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 01:53:35 -0500 Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > here the tail of the make check log. > LOG> Log started 26.08.2011 - 11:34:33 > checking: [forms.OEditModel::com::sun::star::beans::XMultiPropertySet] > is iface: [com.sun.star.beans.XMultiPropertySet] testcode: > [ifc.beans._XMultiProp

Re: [Libreoffice] --enable-werror

On 09/27/2011 10:33 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:06 +0530, Marc-André Laverdière wrote: When I tried using this flag, I ended up not being able to _build_ at all. And that wasn't even due to my own mistake, only some module I know nothing at all is breaking the build.

[Libreoffice] IAccessible2 - Windows (from libreoffice-accessibility)

Hi, For those of you who are interested in the accessibility of LibreOffice (and OpenOffice.org) on Windows - i.e. replacing the Java Accessibility API with IAccessible2 - , I am forwarding a message that Malte Timmermann sent to the LibreOffice Accessibility list. It appears that the code is

Re: [Libreoffice] cppunittester hang when LC_ALL/LANG set

On 09/27/2011 08:20 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 09/27/2011 12:47 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote: I just updated my master build on my notebook after about two weeks and the build hanged in sal when I did *not* unset LANG/LC_ALL. First I bisected it: [...] Does this ring any bell? I tried to revert

Re: [Libreoffice] per-library types headers ...

Some compilers can pull header-parse-caching tricks, but in order for that to work nicely - all compilation modules need to import other files in the same order - the list of macro definitions and other parameters passed into the compiler must be the same for all the compilation modules Michael

Re: [Libreoffice] --enable-werror

I actually like the auto-detect idea! As long as we still have an option to turn it off in case it is misbehaving :) Marc-André Laverdière Software Security Scientist Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services Hyderabad, India On Tue 27 Sep 2011 02:03:59 PM IST, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Marc, >

[Libreoffice] per-library types headers ...

Hi guys, I'm still a tad annoyed by our compile times, and was wondering - has a footypes.hxx header approach been tried in the past. This would add a near complete set of forward declarations of classes, templates, etc. necessary to use that library. I suspect (at the moment) tha

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Libreoffice 3.4 crash on screen resize (lp#852819)

On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 23:56 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > I found another patch that is on master, but missing on -3-4 (after > rootcausing it myself, just to find it being fixed on master). .. > To reproduce the issue: > - Open Libreoffice > - change screen resolution > => Crash Wow

Re: [Libreoffice] --enable-werror

Hi Marc, On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:06 +0530, Marc-André Laverdière wrote: > That experience lead me to believe that the policy > should be "make it easy for the n00b". Quite; easy, and friendly too :-) > When I tried using this flag, I ended up not being able to _build_ at > all. And th

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Refactoring for WMF Loading

/me bumps up the thread in the inboxes. Anyone had time to look at those? Thanks Scarabeus for the trick :) Marc-André Laverdière Software Security Scientist Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services Hyderabad, India On 09/23/2011 04:36 PM, Marc-André Laverdière wrote: > Hello everybody. > >

Re: [Libreoffice] Compilation error in svx undefined reference to `XPropertyList::operator delete(void*)'

On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 01:06 -0700, julien2412 wrote: > Just to tell it compiles ok now, no more pb in svx. > (But "make dev-install" still fails). I believe that may be the smoke-test, which Lubos is labouring away to fix in a satisfying way. Thanks ! Michael. -

Re: [Libreoffice] Compilation error in svx undefined reference to `XPropertyList::operator delete(void*)'

On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 20:25 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > If the only way to create XBitmapList instances is via an (XBitmapList > member) factory function, you do not need (and should remove again) > private new/delete -- private ctor/dtor suffice. And of course you are most welcome

Re: [Libreoffice] Compilation error in svx undefined reference to `XPropertyList::operator delete(void*)'

Hello, Just to tell it compiles ok now, no more pb in svx. (But "make dev-install" still fails). Julien. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Compilation-error-in-svx-undefined-reference-to-XPropertyList-operator-delete-void-tp3366197p3371936.html Sent from the

[Libreoffice] anyone else having trouble pulling from git under windows?

Hi I get sick for a couple of days and when I come back, my machine refuses to pull from git. Maybe it caught the same flu :-) The connection seems to start off fine, and then get dropped during the negotiation phase. Any ideas? Thanks, Noel Grandin. PS. log file created by doing git pull -v