On Sat, 24 Sep 2011, Karl Behler sen. wrote:
> Sorry to bother you again,
>
> made everything clean
> (two times since yesterday)
>
> but during make dev-install it fails with five missing dictionary files.
>
> No idea how to get around this.
>
Try running ./g pull. This updates all the git r
Sorry to bother you again,
made everything clean
(two times since yesterday)
but during make dev-install it fails with five missing dictionary files.
No idea how to get around this.
Apparently I'm not the only one. Found a similar log-file at
http://pastebin.com/2rWz6sJ5
Any help?
Regards,
While working on converting xmerge to gbuild I found that the current
gbuild Jar.mk doesn't support adding non java files to the jar.
The xmerge jars need a component.xml file included in the jar.
I tried to implement file adding but couldn't get it to work. Help with
implementing this would be g
Hi Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Pechlaner schrieb:
Hallo,
I made a mistake, to commit before testing. Therefore are 2 patch-files.
Please, can anybody test this extension.
I think, that it is wrong. Currently we support only that function, that
is named LEGACY.FDIST in the spec. And that function has n
Hallo,
I made a mistake, to commit before testing. Therefore are 2 patch-files.
Please, can anybody test this extension.
Greetings
Wolfgang
>From 18dddf4faa96a12e254e3f5c0fe4c8451a61601c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wolfgang Pechlaner
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:30:41 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2]
Hello,
Attached patch will remove unused variables detected by cppcheck. I've
opengrok'ed ExtEntry and it isn't used anywhere else.
Best Regards,
--
Korrawit Pruegsanusak
0001-cppcheck-unused-variables.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice m
I'm poking at an endless hang in the smoketest:
#12 0xb7d24aec in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3 0xb7f1b6c0 in osl_waitCondition ()
from /data/opt/libreoffice/core/solver/unxlngi6.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3
#4 0xb72db42a in osl::Condition::wait (this=0xbfffb8c4, pTimeout
Hello,
Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> Ideally, we would have someone who could put some cycles into doing a
> Java -> C++ port of LanguageTool.
>
>> Or does LO introduce some own kind of grammar checking?
>
> We rely on LanguageTool.
>
There are other grammar checkers, especially Light
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 09:32 +0200, Karl Behler sen. wrote:
> Finally a clean build helped.
> So I'm sucessfully through again. Thanks.
Sorry for the pain; a few commits recently (my property cleanup, and
Stefan's 3layer revert) cause (and require) almost a full re-build
anyway - so hopefu
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 00:36 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> Really, the layout is a complete mess, at least from an
> architectural POV. There is no clear relationship and ownership between
> objects. That might work better in a world with garbage collection, but
> in the ugly world of pointers this
Hi Arno,
Bother, I replied privately - but again for the list:
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 23:10 -0500, Arno Teigseth wrote:
> 1) I submitted a patch and it got through in september. How do I know
> which is the release it goes into? The next one? 3.5? 3.4.4?
3.5 is the next release, t
Hi guys,
I just pushed a ~500line code removal patch killing some really hairy
and broken lifecycle management of palettes & other XPropertyList types
- now all a safe smart pointer (thanks for Stefan's invaluable advice
too incidentally).
Anyhow - unfortunately our gnumake world
rm -Rf /home/papa/projects/libreoffice/core/sw/unxlngx6.pro
Finally a clean build helped.
So I'm sucessfully through again. Thanks.
--
Karl Behler sen., Garching, Germany
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freed
13 matches
Mail list logo
